What's new

Muslims in 17th century Arakan

Mian Babban

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 7, 2017
Messages
646
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
From mid 17th century source ;

"Although the King of Rakan be a Gentile (Non-Muslim), yet there are many Mahometans (Muslims) mixed with the people, who have either chosen to retire among them, or have been enslaved by the Portuguese before mentioned, in their expeditions to the neighbouring coasts. Sultan Sujah (Shah Shuja, brother of Aurangzeb) secretly gained over these Mahometans, whom he joined with two or three hundred of his own people...."

Reference: "Bernier, François. Travels in the Mogul Empire, A.D. 1656-1668, p-111

I dont know whether those Muslims of Arakan mentioned by Bernier are ancestors of present-day Rohingyas or not. But this goes against the claims of Burmese that all Muslims of Arakan/Rakhine are illegal migrants. From Bernier's account, its obvious that quite a large number of Muslims from India had settled in Arakan in that period.
 
.
From mid 17th century source ;

"Although the King of Rakan be a Gentile (Non-Muslim), yet there are many Mahometans (Muslims) mixed with the people, who have either chosen to retire among them, or have been enslaved by the Portuguese before mentioned, in their expeditions to the neighbouring coasts. Sultan Sujah (Shah Shuja, brother of Aurangzeb) secretly gained over these Mahometans, whom he joined with two or three hundred of his own people...."

Reference: "Bernier, François. Travels in the Mogul Empire, A.D. 1656-1668, p-111

I dont know whether those Muslims of Arakan mentioned by Bernier are ancestors of present-day Rohingyas or not. But this goes against the claims of Burmese that all Muslims of Arakan/Rakhine are illegal migrants. From Bernier's account, its obvious that quite a large number of Muslims from India had settled in Arakan in that period.

Not Muslims from India, necessarily. Read "The Indian Ocean in World History".
 
.
History books are not proofs of anything. They can be correct or false
But
weakness is a crime.

Those in Pakistan who say, Pakistan doesn't need this weapon and that weapon, are criminals.
PAF committed a crime by diverting funds allocated for jet purchases to earthquake victims. Those who oppose ICBM are criminals.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom