What's new

Muslims are strangely obsessed with cartoons, all while there are very real crimes over which they should be angry at France

Yankee-stani

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 22, 2018
Messages
8,100
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
The recent murders of three innocent civilians in Nice following controversy over a teacher’s decision to show his students the infamous Charlie Hebdo cartoons is highlighting a significant weakness in logic in the Islamic world.
I honestly don’t know what to make of France. Not the people –nor the country itself– but the foreign policy inclinations of its respective governments, including those under the leadership of Emmanuel Macron. As a former anti-terrorism cop recently told RT, France may have brought Jihad on itself – in more ways than one.
In Libya, for example, France and its NATO cohorts (in a bombing campaign unofficially orchestrated by the US) provided air cover to al-Qaeda-linked extremists to topple Muammar Gaddafi. Those extremists were the very same militants that US troops had been fighting against for years in Iraq, and almost undoubtedly the same militants that France was supposedly fighting against in Mali.
READ MORE
‘We are in a war’: French interior minister says country must brace for more terrorist attacks fueled by ‘Islamist ideology’‘We are in a war’: French interior minister says country must brace for more terrorist attacks fueled by ‘Islamist ideology’
The decision to destroy Libya did nothing if not spur the spread of Islamic extremism across the African continent and directly exacerbate a looming refugee crisis. Weapons, extremism and slavery began being exported out of what had been transformed into a failed state – all thanks to France. According to some reports, during its bombing campaign, NATO forces also bombed and rendered ineffective a major water supply infrastructure which provided water to 70 percent of Libya’s population. One would think the bombing of 70 percent of the water supply of a Muslim-majority nation should surely rouse at least one Muslim protest, but I digress.
When the French government isn’t bombing Muslim-majority nations, it’s wreaking economic havoc on these states through the use of the France-backed CFA (French Colonies of Africa) franc. As Italy’s former deputy minister and current minister of foreign affairs said “France is one of those countries that, by printing money for 14 African states, prevent their economic development and contribute to the fact that the refugees leave and then die in the sea or arrive on our coasts.”
France has a long and unappreciated history of undermining Islamic civilizations, from Syria to Algeria. During the war of Algerian independence, French soldiers committed a host of atrocities, including torture. 300,000 Algerians died as a result of the conflict. Barely spoken about in the mainstream media, it remains a controversial aspect of France’s bloody history.
This is all barely scratching the surface. An entire book would barely do justice to this topic, yet it’s one I hoped Western media had paid a greater deal of attention to.
Equally frustrating, however, is the Muslim world’s indifferent reaction to these pertinent facts. Where is the Muslim world’s condemnation of France’s very real participation in the genocidal mayhem being inflicted on our Muslim brothers and sisters in Yemen? Where is the unification, the protests and the rallying each time an innocent Muslim is killed due to France’s longstanding imperialist ambitions?
You throw a cartoon in the mix and it’s a different kettle of fish. Add in a president stating that he won’t denounce said cartoons, the equation suddenly results in the following: widespread calls to boycott French products with Qatar and Kuwait actively removing French products from their stores; defamatory remarks from the Turkish president against Macron directly; protests in Israel, Gaza, Bangladesh, Iran, Afghanistan, and Jordan, to name a few; the burning of French flags as well as condemnation from major newspapers until a fanatical lunatic decides to publicly behead innocent French Church-goers, as if it’s the year 629 AD.
READ MORE
Macron needs the help of Muslim world leaders or France’s tally of decapitated heads will continue to riseMacron needs the help of Muslim world leaders or France’s tally of decapitated heads will continue to rise
One Iranian newspaper even called Macron the “Demon of Paris.” Oh – so now he is the demon of Paris. Not when he actively bombed Iran’s closest ally in the Middle East in flagrant violation of international law. Not when he continued to sell arms to Saudi Arabia to commit an endless supply of war crimes in Yemen, another supposed Iranian ally.
“It’s prohibited to draw Mohammed,” one party leader in Bangladesh named Ahmad Abdul Quiayum said, addressing a crowd of protesters.
Except that it’s not. Not according to the Western ideals of free speech – the West being where these drawings took place. As in, you can’t exact Islamic laws on non-Muslims who reside in non-Muslim nations. Even if you agree with Quiayum, you would still have to grapple with the fact that there is no legal, logical or moral requirement for French people to abide by archaic Muslim values.
Supposing I did agree with Quaiyum; how can it be that the depiction of a prophet is higher up on the list of things that enrage Muslim people in comparison to the bombing of our people, the incessant proxy wars plaguing our regions, the backing and funding of terror groups for the pursuit of unstated geopolitical aims, or the mass looting of our resources and the hampering of our countries’ progress?
Real Islamophobia is more than just a sharply-drawn middle finger to the Muslim community from a handful of satirical cartoonists. I’d prefer to think that the God of the Muslim world would not concern himself with such petty, imaginary crimes. Not when we have plenty of very real and serious war crimes and crimes against humanity that we could actually protest about with the aim of exacting real change to benefit some of the most vulnerable people in this world.
And, if you’re offended by this article, I can’t help but notice you’ve essentially proved my point.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.


 
Good question in the OP. So many Muslims venting outrage at some Frenchman's satirical cartoons while the French government has used the same outragable-type Muslims in NATO actions against Muslim-majority countries just because those countries were governed by progressive movements ( Libya, Syria ).
 
Makes sense that Muslims are angry over those cartoons. They consider it a direct attack on Islam and all the 2 billion muslims world over

French Muslims are well within their rights to be angry because in France its not ok to mock Charles De Gaulle but ok to mock Prophet Mohammed.
Something is seriously wrong with French society.

So, in 1970, France, land of freedom, liquidated the ancestor of Charlie Hedbo, because quite simply she made caricatures on the death of General De Gaulle. Minister of the Interior at the time,
Raymond Marcellin declared: “To avoid any ambiguity in the future, I ordered the competent services to always justify these orders. (…) The freedom of the press will be all the better guaranteed in our country as abuses as gross as those which have been incriminated will be punished in accordance with the law. “

 
The west do it with intentions and then expect no reaction from Muslims ..how hypocrite of them
 
Good question in the OP. So many Muslims venting outrage at some Frenchman's satirical cartoons while the French government has used the same outragable-type Muslims in NATO actions against Muslim-majority countries just because those countries were governed by progressive movements ( Libya, Syria ).
Since when is a dictator that murders his own people progressive?
Gadaffi, the al-Assad family and Saddam Hussein all came to power through coups.
Not progressive in my book.
 
Since when is a dictator that murders his own people progressive?
Gadaffi, the al-Assad family and Saddam Hussein all came to power through coups.
Not progressive in my book.
Lolx he gave free electricity... home to everyone.. basic income... marriage allowance to young ones... and much more but his only fault was that he was a dictator who didnt obey US and wanted to being gold backed currency to Africa
 
Since when is a dictator that murders his own people progressive?
Gadaffi, the al-Assad family and Saddam Hussein all came to power through coups.
Not progressive in my book.
Yeah but you bombed their country for no particular good reason, was that dictator doing anything particularly worse or planning to do so?


So you bombed their country

Created chaos that has killed thousands and ruined millions of lives and directly effected the migrant crises




when these protests break out they might have a main reason, ie the prophet
but their is alot of built up anger over multiple issues
 
French Muslims are well within their rights to be angry because in France its not ok to mock Charles De Gaulle but ok to mock Prophet Mohammed.
Something is seriously wrong with French society.

So, in 1970, France, land of freedom, liquidated the ancestor of Charlie Hedbo, because quite simply she made caricatures on the death of General De Gaulle. Minister of the Interior at the time,
Raymond Marcellin declared: “To avoid any ambiguity in the future, I ordered the competent services to always justify these orders. (…) The freedom of the press will be all the better guaranteed in our country as abuses as gross as those which have been incriminated will be punished in accordance with the law. “


I also heard that Charlie Habdo also fired one of their cartoonist for anti-semitism , can't confirm or deny it for now will look more into it, Violence is no use in this situation because western people are stubborn when it comes to giving up their freedom of speech rights , or even if someone told them specifically not to do something they do it even much more intensity , only way is through a Powerful protest with help of Orgs like UN and OIC to create a law which should prohibit any insulting cartoons or movies against God and Prophets , of course we can not apply this law to every individual but we can of course make a law where Govt's will not endorse it like France did it with it when they display those cartoon on their Govt's Buildings .
Not progressive in my book.

Your Book means nothing to people in ME , they have their own way of living and governing .. who give West right to bomb a country who refused to adopt western way of democracy ? there are millions of Americans who are not happy with current US govt's , that does not means that anyone has right to bomb them .
 
The recent murders of three innocent civilians in Nice following controversy over a teacher’s decision to show his students the infamous Charlie Hebdo cartoons is highlighting a significant weakness in logic in the Islamic world.
I honestly don’t know what to make of France. Not the people –nor the country itself– but the foreign policy inclinations of its respective governments, including those under the leadership of Emmanuel Macron. As a former anti-terrorism cop recently told RT, France may have brought Jihad on itself – in more ways than one.
In Libya, for example, France and its NATO cohorts (in a bombing campaign unofficially orchestrated by the US) provided air cover to al-Qaeda-linked extremists to topple Muammar Gaddafi. Those extremists were the very same militants that US troops had been fighting against for years in Iraq, and almost undoubtedly the same militants that France was supposedly fighting against in Mali.
READ MORE
‘We are in a war’: French interior minister says country must brace for more terrorist attacks fueled by ‘Islamist ideology’‘We are in a war’: French interior minister says country must brace for more terrorist attacks fueled by ‘Islamist ideology’
The decision to destroy Libya did nothing if not spur the spread of Islamic extremism across the African continent and directly exacerbate a looming refugee crisis. Weapons, extremism and slavery began being exported out of what had been transformed into a failed state – all thanks to France. According to some reports, during its bombing campaign, NATO forces also bombed and rendered ineffective a major water supply infrastructure which provided water to 70 percent of Libya’s population. One would think the bombing of 70 percent of the water supply of a Muslim-majority nation should surely rouse at least one Muslim protest, but I digress.
When the French government isn’t bombing Muslim-majority nations, it’s wreaking economic havoc on these states through the use of the France-backed CFA (French Colonies of Africa) franc. As Italy’s former deputy minister and current minister of foreign affairs said “France is one of those countries that, by printing money for 14 African states, prevent their economic development and contribute to the fact that the refugees leave and then die in the sea or arrive on our coasts.”
France has a long and unappreciated history of undermining Islamic civilizations, from Syria to Algeria. During the war of Algerian independence, French soldiers committed a host of atrocities, including torture. 300,000 Algerians died as a result of the conflict. Barely spoken about in the mainstream media, it remains a controversial aspect of France’s bloody history.
This is all barely scratching the surface. An entire book would barely do justice to this topic, yet it’s one I hoped Western media had paid a greater deal of attention to.
Equally frustrating, however, is the Muslim world’s indifferent reaction to these pertinent facts. Where is the Muslim world’s condemnation of France’s very real participation in the genocidal mayhem being inflicted on our Muslim brothers and sisters in Yemen? Where is the unification, the protests and the rallying each time an innocent Muslim is killed due to France’s longstanding imperialist ambitions?
You throw a cartoon in the mix and it’s a different kettle of fish. Add in a president stating that he won’t denounce said cartoons, the equation suddenly results in the following: widespread calls to boycott French products with Qatar and Kuwait actively removing French products from their stores; defamatory remarks from the Turkish president against Macron directly; protests in Israel, Gaza, Bangladesh, Iran, Afghanistan, and Jordan, to name a few; the burning of French flags as well as condemnation from major newspapers until a fanatical lunatic decides to publicly behead innocent French Church-goers, as if it’s the year 629 AD.
READ MORE
Macron needs the help of Muslim world leaders or France’s tally of decapitated heads will continue to riseMacron needs the help of Muslim world leaders or France’s tally of decapitated heads will continue to rise
One Iranian newspaper even called Macron the “Demon of Paris.” Oh – so now he is the demon of Paris. Not when he actively bombed Iran’s closest ally in the Middle East in flagrant violation of international law. Not when he continued to sell arms to Saudi Arabia to commit an endless supply of war crimes in Yemen, another supposed Iranian ally.
“It’s prohibited to draw Mohammed,” one party leader in Bangladesh named Ahmad Abdul Quiayum said, addressing a crowd of protesters.
Except that it’s not. Not according to the Western ideals of free speech – the West being where these drawings took place. As in, you can’t exact Islamic laws on non-Muslims who reside in non-Muslim nations. Even if you agree with Quiayum, you would still have to grapple with the fact that there is no legal, logical or moral requirement for French people to abide by archaic Muslim values.
Supposing I did agree with Quaiyum; how can it be that the depiction of a prophet is higher up on the list of things that enrage Muslim people in comparison to the bombing of our people, the incessant proxy wars plaguing our regions, the backing and funding of terror groups for the pursuit of unstated geopolitical aims, or the mass looting of our resources and the hampering of our countries’ progress?
Real Islamophobia is more than just a sharply-drawn middle finger to the Muslim community from a handful of satirical cartoonists. I’d prefer to think that the God of the Muslim world would not concern himself with such petty, imaginary crimes. Not when we have plenty of very real and serious war crimes and crimes against humanity that we could actually protest about with the aim of exacting real change to benefit some of the most vulnerable people in this world.
And, if you’re offended by this article, I can’t help but notice you’ve essentially proved my point.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.



Yes, France is right, please return 30,000 scalps which they took it as war thropy
They are teaching us what is right and what is wrong
 
Good question in the OP. So many Muslims venting outrage at some Frenchman's satirical cartoons while the French government has used the same outragable-type Muslims in NATO actions against Muslim-majority countries just because those countries were governed by progressive movements ( Libya, Syria ).

there is little in the way progressive for Qadaffi or Assad regime. they may be little better than Saudi royals. that is not saying much.
 
The recent murders of three innocent civilians in Nice following controversy over a teacher’s decision to show his students the infamous Charlie Hebdo cartoons is highlighting a significant weakness in logic in the Islamic world.
I honestly don’t know what to make of France. Not the people –nor the country itself– but the foreign policy inclinations of its respective governments, including those under the leadership of Emmanuel Macron. As a former anti-terrorism cop recently told RT, France may have brought Jihad on itself – in more ways than one.
In Libya, for example, France and its NATO cohorts (in a bombing campaign unofficially orchestrated by the US) provided air cover to al-Qaeda-linked extremists to topple Muammar Gaddafi. Those extremists were the very same militants that US troops had been fighting against for years in Iraq, and almost undoubtedly the same militants that France was supposedly fighting against in Mali.
READ MORE
‘We are in a war’: French interior minister says country must brace for more terrorist attacks fueled by ‘Islamist ideology’‘We are in a war’: French interior minister says country must brace for more terrorist attacks fueled by ‘Islamist ideology’
The decision to destroy Libya did nothing if not spur the spread of Islamic extremism across the African continent and directly exacerbate a looming refugee crisis. Weapons, extremism and slavery began being exported out of what had been transformed into a failed state – all thanks to France. According to some reports, during its bombing campaign, NATO forces also bombed and rendered ineffective a major water supply infrastructure which provided water to 70 percent of Libya’s population. One would think the bombing of 70 percent of the water supply of a Muslim-majority nation should surely rouse at least one Muslim protest, but I digress.
When the French government isn’t bombing Muslim-majority nations, it’s wreaking economic havoc on these states through the use of the France-backed CFA (French Colonies of Africa) franc. As Italy’s former deputy minister and current minister of foreign affairs said “France is one of those countries that, by printing money for 14 African states, prevent their economic development and contribute to the fact that the refugees leave and then die in the sea or arrive on our coasts.”
France has a long and unappreciated history of undermining Islamic civilizations, from Syria to Algeria. During the war of Algerian independence, French soldiers committed a host of atrocities, including torture. 300,000 Algerians died as a result of the conflict. Barely spoken about in the mainstream media, it remains a controversial aspect of France’s bloody history.
This is all barely scratching the surface. An entire book would barely do justice to this topic, yet it’s one I hoped Western media had paid a greater deal of attention to.
Equally frustrating, however, is the Muslim world’s indifferent reaction to these pertinent facts. Where is the Muslim world’s condemnation of France’s very real participation in the genocidal mayhem being inflicted on our Muslim brothers and sisters in Yemen? Where is the unification, the protests and the rallying each time an innocent Muslim is killed due to France’s longstanding imperialist ambitions?
You throw a cartoon in the mix and it’s a different kettle of fish. Add in a president stating that he won’t denounce said cartoons, the equation suddenly results in the following: widespread calls to boycott French products with Qatar and Kuwait actively removing French products from their stores; defamatory remarks from the Turkish president against Macron directly; protests in Israel, Gaza, Bangladesh, Iran, Afghanistan, and Jordan, to name a few; the burning of French flags as well as condemnation from major newspapers until a fanatical lunatic decides to publicly behead innocent French Church-goers, as if it’s the year 629 AD.
READ MORE
Macron needs the help of Muslim world leaders or France’s tally of decapitated heads will continue to riseMacron needs the help of Muslim world leaders or France’s tally of decapitated heads will continue to rise
One Iranian newspaper even called Macron the “Demon of Paris.” Oh – so now he is the demon of Paris. Not when he actively bombed Iran’s closest ally in the Middle East in flagrant violation of international law. Not when he continued to sell arms to Saudi Arabia to commit an endless supply of war crimes in Yemen, another supposed Iranian ally.
“It’s prohibited to draw Mohammed,” one party leader in Bangladesh named Ahmad Abdul Quiayum said, addressing a crowd of protesters.
Except that it’s not. Not according to the Western ideals of free speech – the West being where these drawings took place. As in, you can’t exact Islamic laws on non-Muslims who reside in non-Muslim nations. Even if you agree with Quiayum, you would still have to grapple with the fact that there is no legal, logical or moral requirement for French people to abide by archaic Muslim values.
Supposing I did agree with Quaiyum; how can it be that the depiction of a prophet is higher up on the list of things that enrage Muslim people in comparison to the bombing of our people, the incessant proxy wars plaguing our regions, the backing and funding of terror groups for the pursuit of unstated geopolitical aims, or the mass looting of our resources and the hampering of our countries’ progress?
Real Islamophobia is more than just a sharply-drawn middle finger to the Muslim community from a handful of satirical cartoonists. I’d prefer to think that the God of the Muslim world would not concern himself with such petty, imaginary crimes. Not when we have plenty of very real and serious war crimes and crimes against humanity that we could actually protest about with the aim of exacting real change to benefit some of the most vulnerable people in this world.
And, if you’re offended by this article, I can’t help but notice you’ve essentially proved my point.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.



The author clearly doesn't understand the difference between the importance of the holy prophet of Islam and the acts of sold out rulers of Muslim countries who plunder their own countries and make them weak. As a result they become poor and cannot stand in their own
 
Yeah but you bombed their country for no particular good reason, was that dictator doing anything particularly worse or planning to do so?


So you bombed their country

Created chaos that has killed thousands and ruined millions of lives and directly effected the migrant crises




when these protests break out they might have a main reason, ie the prophet
but their is alot of built up anger over multiple issues
USA and NATO did nothing wrong. They had the power so they invaded Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan etc. You guys are weaklings and so got humiliated badly.

If Muslims were superpower today, then they wouldve done the same thing with non muslim countries.
Yes, France is right, please return 30,000 scalps which they took it as war thropy
They are teaching us what is right and what is wrong
Aamir Taimur (Tamer lane), Alauddin Khilji and many islamic rulers did the same thing with non muslims.

French people were rulers of Africa so they did what was necessary to protect their territories.
 
USA and NATO did nothing wrong. They had the power so they invaded Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan etc. You guys are weaklings and so got humiliated badly.

If Muslims were superpower today, then they wouldve done the same thing with non muslim countries.

Aamir Taimur (Tamer lane), Alauddin Khilji and many islamic rulers did the same thing with non muslims.

French people were rulers of Africa so they did what was necessary to protect their territories.

same energy

ElL_cuBX0AIpFQg.png
 
The recent murders of three innocent civilians in Nice following controversy over a teacher’s decision to show his students the infamous Charlie Hebdo cartoons is highlighting a significant weakness in logic in the Islamic world.
I honestly don’t know what to make of France. Not the people –nor the country itself– but the foreign policy inclinations of its respective governments, including those under the leadership of Emmanuel Macron. As a former anti-terrorism cop recently told RT, France may have brought Jihad on itself – in more ways than one.
In Libya, for example, France and its NATO cohorts (in a bombing campaign unofficially orchestrated by the US) provided air cover to al-Qaeda-linked extremists to topple Muammar Gaddafi. Those extremists were the very same militants that US troops had been fighting against for years in Iraq, and almost undoubtedly the same militants that France was supposedly fighting against in Mali.
READ MORE
‘We are in a war’: French interior minister says country must brace for more terrorist attacks fueled by ‘Islamist ideology’‘We are in a war’: French interior minister says country must brace for more terrorist attacks fueled by ‘Islamist ideology’
The decision to destroy Libya did nothing if not spur the spread of Islamic extremism across the African continent and directly exacerbate a looming refugee crisis. Weapons, extremism and slavery began being exported out of what had been transformed into a failed state – all thanks to France. According to some reports, during its bombing campaign, NATO forces also bombed and rendered ineffective a major water supply infrastructure which provided water to 70 percent of Libya’s population. One would think the bombing of 70 percent of the water supply of a Muslim-majority nation should surely rouse at least one Muslim protest, but I digress.
When the French government isn’t bombing Muslim-majority nations, it’s wreaking economic havoc on these states through the use of the France-backed CFA (French Colonies of Africa) franc. As Italy’s former deputy minister and current minister of foreign affairs said “France is one of those countries that, by printing money for 14 African states, prevent their economic development and contribute to the fact that the refugees leave and then die in the sea or arrive on our coasts.”
France has a long and unappreciated history of undermining Islamic civilizations, from Syria to Algeria. During the war of Algerian independence, French soldiers committed a host of atrocities, including torture. 300,000 Algerians died as a result of the conflict. Barely spoken about in the mainstream media, it remains a controversial aspect of France’s bloody history.
This is all barely scratching the surface. An entire book would barely do justice to this topic, yet it’s one I hoped Western media had paid a greater deal of attention to.
Equally frustrating, however, is the Muslim world’s indifferent reaction to these pertinent facts. Where is the Muslim world’s condemnation of France’s very real participation in the genocidal mayhem being inflicted on our Muslim brothers and sisters in Yemen? Where is the unification, the protests and the rallying each time an innocent Muslim is killed due to France’s longstanding imperialist ambitions?
You throw a cartoon in the mix and it’s a different kettle of fish. Add in a president stating that he won’t denounce said cartoons, the equation suddenly results in the following: widespread calls to boycott French products with Qatar and Kuwait actively removing French products from their stores; defamatory remarks from the Turkish president against Macron directly; protests in Israel, Gaza, Bangladesh, Iran, Afghanistan, and Jordan, to name a few; the burning of French flags as well as condemnation from major newspapers until a fanatical lunatic decides to publicly behead innocent French Church-goers, as if it’s the year 629 AD.
READ MORE
Macron needs the help of Muslim world leaders or France’s tally of decapitated heads will continue to riseMacron needs the help of Muslim world leaders or France’s tally of decapitated heads will continue to rise
One Iranian newspaper even called Macron the “Demon of Paris.” Oh – so now he is the demon of Paris. Not when he actively bombed Iran’s closest ally in the Middle East in flagrant violation of international law. Not when he continued to sell arms to Saudi Arabia to commit an endless supply of war crimes in Yemen, another supposed Iranian ally.
“It’s prohibited to draw Mohammed,” one party leader in Bangladesh named Ahmad Abdul Quiayum said, addressing a crowd of protesters.
Except that it’s not. Not according to the Western ideals of free speech – the West being where these drawings took place. As in, you can’t exact Islamic laws on non-Muslims who reside in non-Muslim nations. Even if you agree with Quiayum, you would still have to grapple with the fact that there is no legal, logical or moral requirement for French people to abide by archaic Muslim values.
Supposing I did agree with Quaiyum; how can it be that the depiction of a prophet is higher up on the list of things that enrage Muslim people in comparison to the bombing of our people, the incessant proxy wars plaguing our regions, the backing and funding of terror groups for the pursuit of unstated geopolitical aims, or the mass looting of our resources and the hampering of our countries’ progress?
Real Islamophobia is more than just a sharply-drawn middle finger to the Muslim community from a handful of satirical cartoonists. I’d prefer to think that the God of the Muslim world would not concern himself with such petty, imaginary crimes. Not when we have plenty of very real and serious war crimes and crimes against humanity that we could actually protest about with the aim of exacting real change to benefit some of the most vulnerable people in this world.
And, if you’re offended by this article, I can’t help but notice you’ve essentially proved my point.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.



I have to confess my ignorance - I wasn't aware of most of the issues mentioned in the article, such as France destroying infrastructure that provided water to 70% of Libya's population or France's brutal role in Algeria.

In my view, both the Western and non-Western media have a role to play here in terms of the media focus on acts such as caricatures and hate-mongering against Muslims through derogatory cartoons and Quran burning events. Add in the amount of airtime that subsequent attacks by terrorists get (vs terrorism against Muslims) and contrast that with the amount of coverage events like the bombing of water infrastructure in Libya received.

And let's not pretend that the French caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad and Islam are any different from anti-Semitic caricatures used to demonize Jews. Macron absolutely inflamed the situation because, while defending free speech, he could have also called out the derogatory cartoons for what they were: hate-mongering and xenophobia.
Good question in the OP. So many Muslims venting outrage at some Frenchman's satirical cartoons while the French government has used the same outragable-type Muslims in NATO actions against Muslim-majority countries just because those countries were governed by progressive movements ( Libya, Syria ).
I would agree with some of the other posters criticizing your use of the term 'progressive' to describe regimes in Syria and Libya. They were (are in the case of Syria) dictatorships.

The issue is more with the Western approach to removing regimes such as these, which results in civil war, massive deaths and destruction and inevitably a rise in religious extremists and extremism that relishes such conflict.

Where democratic movements, religious or non-religious, rise up organically (Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood) the West does nothing directly or indirectly to foster new representative governments because their geo-political interests are simply not served by democratic governments that don't kiss Western arse.
 
Last edited:

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom