What's new

Mourning a villain

batmannow

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
18,830
Reaction score
-19
Country
United States
Location
Thailand
Mourning a villain
Mourning a villain - DAWN.COM





THE death of a man who waged war against the Pakistani state and was responsible for the slaughtering of thousands of innocent men, women and children should have come as a great relief to this strife-torn nation.

Instead, our political leaders are mourning the death of Hakeemullah Mehsud in a US drone strike describing the incident as an “attack on peace”.

From being public enemy No.1, the chief of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has virtually been turned into a hero after his inglorious death. A mass murderer who ordered the beheading of our soldiers and claimed responsibility for killing a Pakistani general just a few months ago, is now being elevated to the status of a martyr.

Instead of seizing this moment of opportunity to dismantle a fragmented terrorist network, a frightened political leadership has shamelessly prostrated itself before the militants. As a result, the extremists and their allies are now dominating the public narrative despite their crimes against the people of Pakistan. It is an extremely dangerous situation for a country facing the existential threat of spiralling violent extremism. A narrow self-serving leadership is taking the entire country towards a suicidal path.

With few exceptions, all political parties have joined the chorus that the fatal drone strike on Hakeemullah was a conspiracy to scuttle an illusory peace process. While the interior minister has called for reviewing relations with the US, an agitated Imran Khan has threatened to block the Nato supply line in protest. The bravado may just be public posturing, but the irresponsible rhetoric could lead to some unintentional consequences, plunging the country into more dire straits.

It is a pity that even the killing of young women and children in a suicide bombing in a crowded Peshawar bazaar or the massacre of Christian worshippers in the church bombing has not shaken the great Khan as much as the death of the leader of the militant outfit that perpetrated those heinous attacks. He even refuses to accept that the Taliban were behind those bombings despite their endorsement of the attack.

Seemingly, all the tumult is about the timing of the US action and the violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty once again. According to the interior minister, the attack was carried out hours before a three-member delegation was to meet the TTP leadership and extend to them a formal invitation from the government for talks.

Notwithstanding the questionable legality of America’s drone strikes on Pakistani soil, it is hard to believe that the targeting of the TTP chief was part of a plan to sabotage the talks as alleged by our political leaders.

One should not forget that the TTP leader was on the US’s most wanted list with a bounty of up to $5m on his head. He came on the US radar after a video showed him talking to Hummam Khalil Abu-Mulal al Balawi, a Jordanian doctor with Al Qaeda connections who blew himself up inside a CIA operating base in Afghanistan’s Khost province, killing seven intelligence operatives in 2009. The incident also confirmed his close ties with Al Qaeda.

Soon after, Hakeemullah claimed to have trained Faisal Shehzad, an American of Pakistani origin who was involved in a failed attempt to detonate a car bomb in New York’s Times Square.

Hakeemullah had narrowly escaped several drone strikes in the past three years. He was also reportedly injured in one of them that kept him out of action for several months. Significantly, the fatal attack on Friday came a couple of weeks after the US forces had snatched from the Afghan intelligence agencies Latif Mehsud, a close confidant of the TTP leader.

It is quite plausible that the information gleaned from Latif might have led the CIA to Hakeemullah’s hideout. Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan has confirmed that American officials had informed him that the TTP leader would not be spared if tracked down.

For sure, the drone campaign has remained a major irritant in the troubled relations between Islamabad and Washington. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif also raised the issue during his meeting with President Barack Obama in Washington last month. Indeed, Pakistan’s objection to the violation of the country’s sovereignty is fully justified on legal and ethical grounds. There are no two views about the negative political impact of the collateral damage caused by the drone attacks.

But it is also a fact, that the drones have eliminated many high-value Pakistani militants running their terrorist operations from North Waziristan. Prominent among those killed in the last two years are Waliur Rehman, who was deputy chief of the TTP, Ilyas Kashmiri, Qari Hussain, Qari Zafar and Badar Mansoor. They were all masterminds of attacks on Pakistani security installations.

Pakistan has also decided to contact the five permanent members of the UN Security Council on the killing of Hakeemullah in the latest drone strike. The move will certainly make Pakistan a laughing stock and only weaken the country’s case on the drone issue.

Leave aside other countries, Islamabad cannot even convince its closest ally China on the matter. The militant sanctuaries in North Waziristan are a cause for concern to the entire international community. It is certain that the way Pakistan is dealing with the issue of terrorism will find no takers.

It was questionable from the outset whether the government’s peace efforts could succeed given the uncompromising attitude of the TTP. In his last interview to the BBC, Hakeemullah had rejected any dialogue under the Pakistani Constitution, saying that it envisioned a secular democratic system.

Now with his death that may lead to further fragmentation of the TTP, the possibility of any purposeful negotiations has become even more remote. But the danger is that the current state of policy disarray may provide a conducive environment in which the militants can revitalise their activities. It is perhaps, the most critical point in the country’s struggle against the rising militant threat.

The writer is an author and journalist.

zhussain100@yahoo.com

Twitter: @hidhussain


Share
46 Comment(s)
Print
 
With all due respect but why is it being twisted in all directions, and presented like a Jallebi. I dont condone the way the GOP reacted. But still no where did I see anyone in GOV mourning the retard. But everyone was critical of the timing. Instead of looking at the intentions of the americans and how they screw up everything that is being done in Pakistan so we can have some peace, our sell out media, these prostitutes are making it look like as if for us an icon died. seriously WTF.
 
Major General Sanaullah Niazi is also a Matyr and This Retard who killed him is a Matyr as well ??

So many confused people .
 
It's not the villain but the timing of his killing that is in question. Many of their leaders have been killed already but that didn't stop anything and their apparatus is still in motion.

The real issue here is why US killed him at this sensitive moment.
He deserved death and ain't no martyr, we love to twist everything and portray different story just to make things more complicated.
 
This TTP menace has become very complex problem after killing of mehsud and rejection of talks by militants
 
It's not the villain but the timing of his killing that is in question. Many of their leaders have been killed already but that didn't stop anything and their apparatus is still in motion.

The real issue here is why US killed him at this sensitive moment.
He deserved death and ain't no martyr, we love to twist everything and portray different story just to make things more complicated.
well the answer is Americans couldn't care less about Pakistan's supposed peace talks with a terrorist organisation that Pakistan considers its greatest enemy ..they also aware of the results of last peace talks Pakistan held with Taliban.where you ended up handing over SWAT to them. It's not the first time US targeted him..a few months back he narrowly escaped death was it a sensitive time too? But what you can be absolutely sure of his death had very little to do with your supposed peace talks.
 
well the answer is Americans couldn't care less about Pakistan's supposed peace talks with a terrorist organisation that Pakistan considers its greatest enemy ..they also aware of the results of last peace talks Pakistan held with Taliban.where you ended up handing over SWAT to them. It's not the first time US targeted him..a few months back he narrowly escaped death was it a sensitive time too? But what you can be absolutely sure of his death had very little to do with your supposed peace talks.

Why is US going into talks with their biggest nemesis AQ? Being the best power in the world they should obliterate their enemy rather than talking yet the going the other route why?

Given the circumstances what is the best way forward then?
 
Why is US going into talks with their biggest nemesis AQ? Being the best power in the world they should obliterate their enemy rather than talking yet the going the other route why?

Given the circumstances what is the best way forward then?
You mistake Pakistan's strategic interests align with US strategic interests. Being the strongest power on earth they do what they want against , when they want. Hakeemullah was killed not because they cared enough to sabotage Pakistani peace talks but because they didn't care for them at all..they killed him as soon as they had an opportunity.
 
You mistake Pakistan's strategic interests align with US strategic interests. Being the strongest power on earth they do what they want against , when they want. Hakeemullah was killed not because they cared enough to sabotage Pakistani peace talks but because they didn't care for them at all..they killed him as soon as they had an opportunity.
Then our stance against USA is right, they stepped over our interests and we shall protest in the capacity we can.
 
Major General Sanaullah Niazi is also a Matyr and This Retard who killed him is a Matyr as well ??

So many confused people .
It's not the villain but the timing of his killing that is in question. Many of their leaders have been killed already but that didn't stop anything and their apparatus is still in motion.

The real issue here is why US killed him at this sensitive moment.
He deserved death and ain't no martyr, we love to twist everything and portray different story just to make things more complicated.
care to explain what sensitive moment! plz?
 
They we very close to hold meeting, everything was prepared. It wouldn't have harmed to suss them out!
This drone strike by US at crucial time has given talibans now a clear reason to 'justify' their insurgencies against government of Pakistan.
The above article has twisted the context of 'protest' against US drone strike.
 
Then our stance against USA is right, they stepped over our interests and we shall protest in the capacity we can.

To what end?

You need them to do, what they are doing because you can't. In all the year Hakimullah terrorized the Pakistani populace, only people, who even got close to stopping him were the drone operators sitting thousands of miles away in Langley.

Your strategic objectives may not align all the way.. but they are still taking out your garbage, as you are mostly unable to and in many cases unwilling to do it.
 
They we very close to hold meeting, everything was prepared. It wouldn't have harmed to suss them out!
any proof of that?
or its just comming out of CHODRI mr beans,s mouth?
& you are beliving this crap?
or isnt thats what PMLn tried via its Mr pracha (aka mr, bond of Pmln) to hakeem ullha mehsood?
yes the same hakeem ulhaa , who was pissed off after comming to the knowledge , PMLn was trying to contact & pursue punjabi TTp commander to lay down his weapons?
its just bunch of lies, no body was intersted in these, stupid never planned peace talks?
& now they started crying, its this close, politicians are bunch of liars, as they are allways?
but now i guss, its thier turn to get hits by TTP?
at least for me, i ill be happy to see it, as every day i keep , hearing its only innocent civillians & soilders the victims of TTp terrorism? 
To what end?

You need them to do, what they are doing because you can't. In all the year Hakimullah terrorized the Pakistani populace, only people, who even got close to stopping him were the drone operators sitting thousands of miles away in Langley.

Your strategic objectives may not align all the way.. but they are still taking out your garbage, as you are mostly unable to and in many cases unwilling to do it.
sorry to intrup, you a bit friend!
but if we were not able to hold the terrorists back, then today pakistan may hve been TALBANISTAN instead of pakistan?
we did hit them hard, but the fact is clear they, hve thier support from other countries too?
we did a massive clearence job in sawat, or tirah valley!
but our politicians, allways wanted these terrorists attacking our army, so our army be bzy with them, & the hell politicians enjoy, thier croupt power, to make more of money transfers to swiss banks, thats whole mess out there, if not they might hve supported , a real brutal & dedicated militry action against terrorists?
 
Last edited:
To what end?

You need them to do, what they are doing because you can't. In all the year Hakimullah terrorized the Pakistani populace, only people, who even got close to stopping him were the drone operators sitting thousands of miles away in Langley.

Your strategic objectives may not align all the way.. but they are still taking out your garbage, as you are mostly unable to and in many cases unwilling to do it.

Need them to do?
How about TTP scum hiding across the borders? taking out one man will not solve this issue. Either they do something about the operatives as well or we are not going to get anywhere.
They only take out our garbage when it suits them, unless they start going after TTP hiding across border they ain't doing much.
TTP cross the border at their leisure, do the dirty and run back.
 
Back
Top Bottom