Milo meets Alex Jones

[T-72M1]

While people can/may disagree with their politics all they want, there can be no doubting that both Alex Jones and Milo Yiannopoulos are formidable voices whose considerable reach and influence helped tip the scales in favour of Trump in the last US elections.

this is a tremendous interview, real journalism, as opposed to bleeding frrom her wherever fake news msm hack Megyn Kelly.

@Nilgiri @Desert Fox @Gomig-21 @Zibago et al

 

[Zibago]

While people can/may disagree with their politics all they want, there can be no doubting that both Alex Jones and Milo Yiannopoulos are formidable voices whose considerable reach and influence helped tip the scales in favour of Trump in the last US elections.

this is a tremendous interview, real journalism, as opposed to bleeding frrom her wherever fake news msm hack Megyn Kelly.

@Nilgiri @Desert Fox @Gomig-21 @Zibago et al

ALex is just a clown but Milo is someone i would say says a lot of things that need to be looked into safe spaces in colleges over feelings are stupid you should be equipped to handle shit dont make a generation of weaklings

 

[Jungibaaz]

While people can/may disagree with their politics all they want, there can be no doubting that both Alex Jones and Milo Yiannopoulos are formidable voices whose considerable reach and influence helped tip the scales in favour of Trump in the last US elections.

this is a tremendous interview, real journalism, as opposed to bleeding frrom her wherever fake news msm hack Megyn Kelly.

@Nilgiri @Desert Fox @Gomig-21 @Zibago et al

Milo's an attention seeker, and Jones used to be anti-everything establishment back in the day when he was all about talk radio. He was a conspiracy theorist then but did once in a while say things of some validity.

However, these guys aren't to be taken that seriously, especially Milo. Milo I can just dismiss now as being the voice of an internet movement like the alt-right full of mostly frustrated young men who hang around in youtube comment sections obsessing about non-issues such as extreme feminism. Jones used to be a conspiracy theorist, he's had to lose his way now in order to support the current administration. As for others, the stories these guys and outlets like Breitbart peddle are based on outright lies, exaggerations and contain a strong bias of their own to combat mainstream narrative bias. Eventually these voices will become less prominent, most people in the US are not New York liberals, granted, but they're not nuts on the order of Alex Jones, Milo or Steve Bannon either. And that's just considering those who call themselves conservatives with a small 'c'.

Also, the idea that these guys represent journalism as you said is a joke, you have to be off your senses to believe that. That is not to say however that CNN or MSNBC hosts are better journalists or commentators, they're not either. If you want journalists that challenge mainstream narrative in the US and elsewhere, in valid ways practising actual journalism with critical analysis and detail, look no further than the likes of Seymour Hersh, Robert Frisk, Amy Goodman and others.

 

[Gomig-21]

Thanks for the tag, bro. Good to see you back, try not to get banned anymore, will ya?! lol
I'll have to watch that in dribs and drabs since it's pretty long, but I'll say this; maybe the more relevant question is why the bias from the msm? What's to gain from it and what's the depth of it? Is it all about ratings? The msm can't all be liberal and work their journalism strictly on party lines and under the notion that representing the media is all about ratings and the bottom line. Aren't they better off being down the middle and show the news based on that concept? And what makes someone like Alex Jones a trailblazer of real journalism? Isn't half (or even more) of his stuff just outrageous conspiracy theories? Isn't that a form of manipulating the media for ratings and $? So guys like him are just the opposite side of the spectrum?

 

[Jungibaaz]

ALex is just a clown but Milo is someone i would say says a lot of things that need to be looked into safe spaces in colleges over feelings are stupid you should be equipped to handle shit dont make a generation of weaklings

Milo's a clown too, only he's an internet clown. I've heard ramblings by him and others concerned with extreme feminists, safe spaces, snowflake generation etc. These are all non-issues and where they are issues, they're blown way out of proportion.

But still somehow on the internet a few attention seekers like Milo can use these buzzwords to build a following of obsessed individuals, mostly disenfranchised young men, and mobilise them as the alt-right and other political movements.

 

[Ilay]

They are both not stupid, they know that provocative behavior will get them more rating then a rational one. Though the ideal they represent is good they should not be a face or representatives of it, Ben Shapiro is a good example of level headed and rational representative for the right instead of them.

 

[Zibago]

look no further than the likes of Seymour Hersh, Robert Frisk, Amy Goodman and others.

The only tv show i watch regularly is

 

[T-72M1]

Milo's an attention seeker, and Jones used to be anti-everything establishment back in the day when he was all about talk radio. He was a conspiracy theorist then but did once in a while say things of some validity.

He's still mostly a US talk radio guy, also been on message since forever, kinda like Trump.

However, these guys aren't to be taken that seriously, especially Milo. Milo I can just dismiss now as being the voice of an internet movement like the alt-right full of mostly frustrated young men who hang around in youtube comment sections obsessing about non-issues such as extreme feminism. Jones used to be a conspiracy theorist, he's had to lose his way now in order to support the current administration. As for others, the stories these guys and outlets like Breitbart peddle are based on outright lies, exaggerations and contain a strong bias of their own to combat mainstream narrative bias. Eventually these voices will become less prominent, most people in the US are not New York liberals, granted, but they're not nuts on the order of Alex Jones, Milo or Steve Bannon either. And that's just considering those who call themselves conservatives with a small 'c'.

Milo isn't "alt-right", he's a gay jew who "likes" African men because..

the hitler loving alt right nazis hate him more that they hate Rachel Maddow, because he's on their side (internal scum).. kind of like isis and the shia LOL

Also, the idea that these guys represent journalism as you said is a joke, you have to be off your senses to believe that. That is not to say however that CNN or MSNBC hosts are better journalists or commentators, they're not either. If you want journalists that challenge mainstream narrative in the US and elsewhere, in valid ways practising actual journalism with critical analysis and detail, look no further than the likes of Seymour Hersh, Robert Frisk, Amy Goodman and others.

I said this interview represents journalism.

Alex spoke with Megyn Kelly for hours, all of it on camera, but the fakenews msm released a highly edited 30 second version or something of him talking when the interview aired... what does that say ?

other than that, watch the interview, you might well come out the other side feeling just the same (or maybe even worse) about these individuals but at least you'll have a truer picture of what they're saying as opposed to the msm demonization and caricature they have built for you.

Thanks for the tag, bro. Good to see you back, try not to get banned anymore, will ya?! lol
I'll have to watch that in dribs and drabs since it's pretty long, but I'll say this; maybe the more relevant question is why the bias from the msm? What's to gain from it and what's the depth of it? Is it all about ratings? The msm can't all be liberal and work their journalism strictly on party lines and under the notion that representing the media is all about ratings and the bottom line. Aren't they better off being down the middle and show the news based on that concept? And what makes someone like Alex Jones a trailblazer of real journalism? Isn't half (or even more) of his stuff just outrageous conspiracy theories? Isn't that a form of manipulating the media for ratings and $? So guys like him are just the opposite side of the spectrum?

Within the US media landscape, CNN used to be the "neutral" but establishment voice while FOX and MSNBC leaned to the right and left never hid it.

too bad

bigly

I never said he/they are trailblazers of real journalism. The Milo interview in the op is real journalism. For the rest, guys like Alex, Milo etc put out their version of/thoughts on stuff, Cenk and co do their thing on the other side.. fun to watch, because they can tip elections and change/write history.

also, surprised to still be alive, had a major run in with one of the top guys here the other day lol.

 

[Desert Fox]

While people can/may disagree with their politics all they want, there can be no doubting that both Alex Jones and Milo Yiannopoulos are formidable voices whose considerable reach and influence helped tip the scales in favour of Trump in the last US elections.

this is a tremendous interview, real journalism, as opposed to bleeding frrom her wherever fake news msm hack Megyn Kelly.

@Nilgiri @Desert Fox @Gomig-21 @Zibago et al

Thanks for the tag bro.

Milo and Alex do bring up some some pertinent issues that need to be addressed, however it's hard to take them seriously, for me at least, considering that they are more entertainers than ideologues and this is especially true of Milo as he's been jumping from one controversial issue to another in order to remain relevant.

 

[T-72M1]

Thanks for the tag bro.

Milo and Alex do bring up some some pertinent issues that need to be addressed, however it's hard to take them seriously, for me at least, considering that they are more entertainers than ideologues and this is especially true of Milo as he's been jumping from one controversial issue to another in order to remain relevant.

fair enough, I'm not trying tout and peddle any of their perspectives' as the whole truth or anything..

just that they're big league alt-media voices who deserve to be heard (even if you disagree with everything they say) :shrug:

 

[Bilawal Bhutto]

Alex Jones: "Barack Obama is a member of ISIS and Al Qaeda. The leftist mainstream media is controlling us right now, they don't want you to hear this. They are planning to assisinate Donald Trump and his voters in Russia. They are obstructionists and gave nuclear warheads to North Korea."

 

[Jungibaaz]

other than that, watch the interview, you might well come out the other side feeling just the same (or maybe even worse) about these individuals but at least you'll have a truer picture of what they're saying as opposed to the msm demonization and caricature they have built for you.

I can't unfortunately watch all of that right now, and frankly, as mad as Alex is, I find Milo to be rather insufferable. I might give it a shot when I have time though.

Also, the MSM didn't build any caricature of these two for me. I was aware of Alex Jones almost a decade and a half ago, before anyone on TV had heard of him. And Milo I heard of due to having had spent time on those internet communities obsessed about certain issues.

 

[Desert Fox]

fair enough, I'm not trying tout and peddle any of their perspectives' as the whole truth or anything..

just that they're big league alt-media voices who deserve to be heard (even if you disagree with everything they say) :shrug:

Absolutely and I agree. Don't get me wrong I'm not trying g to downplay the effectiveness their work. Clearly they are very influential and out did the mainstream media (in combination with other Alt-Media outlets) during the whole 2016 Presidential campaign and continuing to grow in audience as the legacy media is dying out.

 

[Gomig-21]

Within the US media landscape, CNN used to be the "neutral" but establishment voice while FOX and MSNBC leaned to the right and left never hid it.



too bad

bigly

I never said he/they are trailblazers of real journalism. The Milo interview in the op is real journalism. For the rest, guys like Alex, Milo etc put out their version of/thoughts on stuff, Cenk and co do their thing on the other side.. fun to watch, because they can tip elections and change/write history.

You're right, you didn't say that. My mistake.
That is some funny stuff ~ "What happened? I did, Bigly."
As nuts as he is, he does have some funny and goofy moments lol.

 

[T-72M1]

the legacy media is dying out.

This ! more than Trump, is the best thing that happened to America imo.

pretty sure real liberals (not the so called progressives) will agree as well.

the end of the dinosaur media

You're right, you didn't say that. My mistake.
That is some funny stuff ~ "What happened? I did, Bigly."
As nuts as he is, he does have some funny and goofy moments lol.

He does, and this whole thing is hilarious as hell.

To those heavily invested in and deeply ideologically opposed to the GOP/Trump, lighten up, take a step back, and enjoy the show.

they're good people, Mr Trump and his lot, cut them some slack