What's new

Kazakhstan president: China does not have concentration camps

.
Mahathir's thoughts on Uyghurs in China
It's hilarious to watch how hard and desperate this western reporter tries to turn Mahathir against China and how frustrated she is failing to bait Mahathir into her trap, it's more of a heckling session than an interview.

 
.
The West is simply trying to break apart Taiwan, HK, Tibet and Xinjiang so NATO can 'Soviet Union' China.


What was once Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact, is now mostly NATO and Washington bases. To encircle Russia. China is fighting against this.

HK protesters are rioters and destroy property in HK, however Washington supports violent thuggish protesters. This should be enough to prove the West is out to encircle and break up China.

Gorbachev was a great guy, one of the best Soviet Union leaders because he was kind and caring but trusted the lying, murderous West:

Newly Declassified Documents: Gorbachev Was Told NATO Wouldn't Move Past East German Border
So what happened?

by Dave Majumdar
Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev was given a host of assurances that the NATO alliance would not expand past what was then the East German border in 1990 according to new declassified documents.

SPONSORED CONTENT
Recommended by

Russian leaders often complain that the NATO extended an invitation to Hungary, Poland and what was then Czechoslovakia to joint the alliance in 1997 at the Madrid Summit in contravention of assurances offered to the Soviet Union before its 1991 collapse. The alliance has dismissed the notion that such assurances were offered, however, scholars have continued to debate the issue for years. Now, however, newly declassified documents show that Gorbachev did in fact receive assurances that NATO would not expand past East Germany.

“The documents show that multiple national leaders were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991,” George Washington University National Security Archives researchers Svetlana Savranskaya and Tom Blanton wrote. “That discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about being misled about NATO expansion were founded in written contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels.”

Recommended: 5 Most Powerful Aircraft Carriers, Subs, Bombers and Fighter Aircraft Ever

Recommended: North Korea Has 200,000 Soldiers in Its Special Forces

0

6
seconds
Do You Know What Happened On This Day?

Recommended: Why Doesn't America Kill Kim Jong Un?

Indeed, Russian Presidents Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin have complained bitterly about the expansion of NATO towards their borders despite what they had believed were assurances to the contrary. “What happened to the assurances our western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are those declarations today?” Putin said at the Munich Conference on Security Policy in 2007.“No one even remembers them. But I will allow myself to remind this audience what was said. I would like to quote the speech of NATO General Secretary Mr. Woerner in Brussels on 17 May 1990. He said at the time that: ‘the fact that we are ready not to place a NATO army outside of German territory gives the Soviet Union a firm security guarantee.’ Where are these guarantees?”

As the newly declassified documents show, the Russians might have had a point. While it was previously understood that Secretary of State James Baker’s assurance to Gorbachev that NATO would not expand “not one inch eastward” during a February 9, 1990, meeting was only in the context of German reunification, the new documents show that this was not the case.

Gorbachev only accepted German reunification—over which the Soviet Union had a legal right to veto under treaty—because he received assurances that NATO would not expand after he withdrew his forces from Eastern Europe from James Baker, President George H.W. Bush, West German foreign minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher, West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, the CIA Director Robert Gates, French President Francois Mitterrand, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, British foreign minister Douglas Hurd, British Prime Minister John Major, and NATO secretary-general Manfred Woerner.

Indeed, as late as March 1991, the British were reassuring Gorbachev that they could not foresee circumstances under which NATO might expand into Eastern and Central Europe. As former British Ambassador to the Soviet Union recounted in March 5, 1991, Rodric Braithwaite, both British foreign minister Douglas Hurd and British Prime Minister John Major told the Soviet that NATO would not expand eastwards.

“I believe that your thoughts about the role of NATO in the current situation are the result of misunderstanding,” Major had told Gorbachev. We are not talking about strengthening of NATO. We are talking about the coordination of efforts that is already happening in Europe between NATO and the West European Union, which, as it is envisioned, would allow all members of the European Community to contribute to enhance [our] security.”

Of course, later, in 1994, Bill Clinton decided to expand NATO eastward despite the various assurances that the previous administration had offered Gorbachev—and despite legendary diplomat George F. Kennan’s repeated warnings.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/t...d-documents-gorbachev-told-nato-wouldnt-23629

Lesson learned: Don't have kind and caring leaders to face the West. You have to know you are dealing with subhuman genociders seeking your ruin. Be kind and caring to those who deserve good will.

Gorbachev was a gift to the world, but the West knew he was not for war and conflict, so what could have been 40 years of Gorbachev ruling the Soviet Union in peace, the West used the 'goodness' of Gorbachev against the Soviet Union to create the mess Russia is in today. The West EXPLOITS good willed people for the West tries to destroy anybody good in the world.
 
Last edited:
.
US can only rally help from those who already helped US (the western countries and Japan), but that's it.

US just passed a Xinjiang bill today and a Hong kong bill a couple of days ago, 10 years ago they passed several Tibet bills and gave Dalai Lama the Nobel peace prize, they can pass as many bills as they want, but today's China is just unstoppable and they can never win a fight against China.
 
.
US can only rally help from those who already helped US (the western countries and Japan), but that's it.

US just passed a Xinjiang bill today and a Hong kong bill a couple of days ago, 10 years ago they passed several Tibet bills and gave Dalai Lama the Nobel peace prize, they can pass as many bills as they want, but today's China is just unstoppable and they can never win a fight against China.

Let's not just say we are unstoppable. We will work at it. There is no way to see the future with confidence.
 
.
the world is more divided and the jealousy of west can be seen easily... they themselves r to b blamed for their own downfall ...
 
.
Kazakhstan to return asylum seekers to China: security committee

Published December 7, 2019, 12:22 AM
By Agence France-Presse

Two ethnic Kazakhs from China’s Xinjiang region arrested for illegally entering Kazakhstan in an asylum bid will be handed back to China, the Central Asian country’s national security committee said Friday.

Kaster Musakhan and Murager Alimuly were detained by the national security committee (KNB) days after publishing video appeals in which they admitted crossing the border illegally and begged Kazakhstan to allow them to stay after alleging they were tortured in China.

Up to one million ethnic Uighurs and other mostly Muslim Turkic minorities are believed to be held in re-education camps in China, according to estimates cited by a United Nations panel in 2018.

But in an interview published on KNB’s official YouTube channel Friday, deputy chief Darkhan Dilmanov said the pair had “no chances of staying” after a Kazakh court case which he said was due to begin soon.

“In this situation, we will transfer them to the People’s Republic of China,” Dilmanov said.

Oil-rich Kazakhstan, with strong economic links to China, has become a hub for reporting on Xinjiang thanks to local activists who have encouraged former detainees and citizens with relatives in Xinjiang to speak.

There are at least 1.5 million Kazakhs living in Xinjiang, the region’s second-largest Turkic group after the Uighurs.

Landlocked Kazakhstan has described itself as the “buckle” in Beijing’s trillion-dollar Belt and Road trade and infrastructure project and prides itself on good relations with both Russia and China.

https://news.mb.com.ph/2019/12/07/kazakhstan-to-return-asylum-seekers-to-china-security-committee/
 
. .
Said it after taking bribes from the CCP.
They are the top leaders of their respective countries, US has more money than China and they never scrimp spending billions to destabilize other countries and governments, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria...so money is not the factor here.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom