Justice ibrahim warned field marshal ayub khan in 1962

[SecularNationalist]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1115515139883708421

 

[war&peace]

1. Mir Jaffer
2. Mir Sadek
3. Mir Hamid

 

[Sine Nomine]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1115515139883708421

Zillalat check karoo in kee.
They moment they have realised that IK wants a Presidential system,which would empower public more,these turds have started their propaganda.Here are few tweets from these paid souls.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1115520115150348289

https://twitter.com/x/status/984851966131097600

That tweet is from 2018.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1115499893659963392

 

[war&peace]

Zillalat check karoo in kee.
They moment they have realised that IK wants a Presidential system,which would empower public more,these turds have started their propaganda.Here are few tweets from these paid souls.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1115520115150348289

https://twitter.com/x/status/984851966131097600

That tweet is from 2018.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1115499893659963392

Exactly, my thoughts because now there is a serious plan to change the system since current system has failed but these corrupt people & traitors are happy with it because they have hijacked it and they can manipulate it.

 

[Jf Thunder]

if IK is for the Presidential system
them he must not be stopped
away with the 18th Amendment

 

[Reddington]

if IK is for the Presidential system
them he must not be stopped
away with the 18th Amendment

Removing 18th amendment alone won't solve anything. Entire constitution needs to be rewritten. The entire criteria of electing Parliamentarians needs to be changed along with appointment of ministers.
Plus there must be a separation of elected members from the government.

The most important thing is to remove this corrupt/decadent/rotten 1860's Anglo-Saxon colonial Judicial System.
Then and only then can a real "Change" take place in Pakistan.

 

[Jf Thunder]

Removing 18th amendment alone won't do anything. Entire constitution needs to be rewritten. The entire criteria of electing Parliamentarians needs to be changed along with appointment of ministers.
Plus there must be a separation of elected members from the government.

The most important thing is to remove this corrupt/decadent/rotten 1860's Anglo-Saxon colonial Judicial System.
Then and only then can a real "Change" take place in Pakistan.

this is going to be huge then
specially if your consider removing the Judicial system, who shall come up with a new one? What will happen to the old judges? How will they be trained. A very difficult path
even more difficult that writing a new constitution .

 

[Reddington]

this is going to be huge then
specially if your consider removing the Judicial system, who shall come up with a new one? What will happen to the old judges? How will they be trained. A very difficult path
even more difficult that writing a new constitution .

NO JUSTICE, NO CHANGE!!!!!!!

 

[Jf Thunder]

NO JUSTICE, NO CHANGE!!!!!!!

Mr Reddington, I have seen you in action in the "Blacklist"
your actions for "change" are quite radical, these are not implementable in real life..........

 

[Reddington]

Mr Reddington, I have seen you in action in the "Blacklist"
your actions for "change" are quite radical, these are not implementable in real life..........

The problem with Pakistanis is that they never try to think out of box/radical solutions.
If someone says it out loud, the next question people ask is; Who will do that & How it will happen.

To save Pakistan from this "System", Radical/out of box solutions is the need of the hour.
@Mangus Ortus Novem

 

[SIPRA]

1) First thing is that presidential form of system is as much democratic as the parliamentary form. There can be a variety of political systems, within the democratic framework, which a country may adopt.
2) Bangladesh didn't came into being owing to the adoption of presidential form in 1962; rather the seeds of its separation were very much present in the Lahore Resolution of March 23, 1940, later called Pakistan Resolution, in which more than one Muslim majority states were envisaged. West and East Pakistan remained together, owing primarily to the emotional and sentimental environment of those times. Once these sentiments cooled off with time, other considerations came into play and the logical result was separation of Bangladesh. These two parts were not destined, in any case, to remain together, for long.

 

[IbnAbdullah]

Salaam

All the theoretical benefits from parliamentary system aside, I think we have seen that it really doesn't work too well in Pakistan's case.

A system more designed for Pakistan's situation would be better instead of copying one or the other as is.


..