Jang Group Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman acquitted in property case

[muhammadhafeezmalik]

Jang Group Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman acquitted in property case​

An accountability court in Lahore has acquitted Jang-Geo Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman and all the other suspects named in a case relating to a property transaction that took place more than three decades ago.

The accountability court declared that no charges were proved against the suspects and declared them innocent.

During the previous hearing, Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman’s counsel, Amjad Perviz, had submitted an application with the court under Section 265-k seeking his client’s acquittal.

He pleaded with the court to acquit his client as there was nothing in the evidence presented against him.

At the outset of today's hearing, the accountability court judge acquitted Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman and all the other suspects nominated in the case.

The court further issued an order to release all seized properties of Rahman.

It is pertinent to mention here that in November 2020 Supreme Court had granted bail to Rahman who stayed in the custody of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) for eight months.

The case​

NAB had filed the reference over the property deal reached with the owners of private land in 1986. Based on this purchase, the anti-graft body had summoned Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman on March 5, 2020.

The editor-in-chief had presented all documents of the land and also recorded his statement. However, NAB had summoned him again on March 12 and arrested him.

According to constitutional and legal experts, his arrest during the scrutiny of land documents was unwarranted as NAB law does not allow for the arrest of any businessman during an inquiry.

The land was allotted according to the Lahore Development Authority (LDA) rules and regulations, with the formal approval of the competent authorities, and in accordance with the LDA Exemption policy at that time.

All payments were made according to the government approved rates, just like all other allottees. In the entire process, no law was violated, and no loss was caused to the national exchequer.

Former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was nominated in the reference as the then Punjab chief minister. Former DG LDA Humayun Faiz and Mian Bashir Ahmad had also been nominated in the case by the anti-graft body.

Two petitions were filed in the Lahore High Court (LHC), one for Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman's bail and the other for his acquittal. Dismissing the pleas, the court had ordered to approach it once again at the right time.

On July 8, a division bench of the LHC had dismissed Rahman’s bail application after his arrest.

Later, the editor-in-chief filed another petition in the Supreme Court on September 11 in which it was argued that the decision of the Lahore High Court should be quashed and he should be granted bail.

A three-member bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Mushir Alam and comprising Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, heard the bail plea of Rahman.

On November 9, 2020, the Supreme Court granted bail to Rahman.

Jang Group Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman acquitted in property case

LAHORE: An accountability court in Lahore has acquitted Jang-Geo Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman and all the other suspects named in a case relating to a property transaction that took place...

www.thenews.com.pk

 

[tman786]

Judiciary is biggest threat to Pakistan after the TTP

 

[Mentee]

Judiciary is biggest threat to Pakistan after the TTP

Department of public prosecution an executive branch of the pti govt coundnt prove its case .

 

[Riz]

Jang Group Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman acquitted in property case​

An accountability court in Lahore has acquitted Jang-Geo Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman and all the other suspects named in a case relating to a property transaction that took place more than three decades ago.

The accountability court declared that no charges were proved against the suspects and declared them innocent.

View attachment 812308

During the previous hearing, Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman’s counsel, Amjad Perviz, had submitted an application with the court under Section 265-k seeking his client’s acquittal.

He pleaded with the court to acquit his client as there was nothing in the evidence presented against him.

At the outset of today's hearing, the accountability court judge acquitted Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman and all the other suspects nominated in the case.

The court further issued an order to release all seized properties of Rahman.

It is pertinent to mention here that in November 2020 Supreme Court had granted bail to Rahman who stayed in the custody of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) for eight months.

The case​

NAB had filed the reference over the property deal reached with the owners of private land in 1986. Based on this purchase, the anti-graft body had summoned Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman on March 5, 2020.

The editor-in-chief had presented all documents of the land and also recorded his statement. However, NAB had summoned him again on March 12 and arrested him.

According to constitutional and legal experts, his arrest during the scrutiny of land documents was unwarranted as NAB law does not allow for the arrest of any businessman during an inquiry.

The land was allotted according to the Lahore Development Authority (LDA) rules and regulations, with the formal approval of the competent authorities, and in accordance with the LDA Exemption policy at that time.

All payments were made according to the government approved rates, just like all other allottees. In the entire process, no law was violated, and no loss was caused to the national exchequer.

Former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was nominated in the reference as the then Punjab chief minister. Former DG LDA Humayun Faiz and Mian Bashir Ahmad had also been nominated in the case by the anti-graft body.

Two petitions were filed in the Lahore High Court (LHC), one for Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman's bail and the other for his acquittal. Dismissing the pleas, the court had ordered to approach it once again at the right time.

On July 8, a division bench of the LHC had dismissed Rahman’s bail application after his arrest.

Later, the editor-in-chief filed another petition in the Supreme Court on September 11 in which it was argued that the decision of the Lahore High Court should be quashed and he should be granted bail.

A three-member bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Mushir Alam and comprising Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, heard the bail plea of Rahman.

On November 9, 2020, the Supreme Court granted bail to Rahman.

Jang Group Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman acquitted in property case

LAHORE: An accountability court in Lahore has acquitted Jang-Geo Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman and all the other suspects named in a case relating to a property transaction that took place...

www.thenews.com.pk

Both court and mijeeb are corrupt both saved each others

 

[AZ1]

So much for transparency report lol

Pakistan ranks 130 out of 139 countries in adherence to rule of law

ISLAMABAD: The World Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index 2021 report shows that Pakistan is among the lowest ranked countries in its adherence to the rule of law, ranking 130th out of 139...

www.thenews.com.pk

 

[Imran Khan]

جج کی بیوی نے حساب دے دیا جو باقی لوگ دیں ایسی عدلیہ پر ہزار لعنت ۔ یہ لوگ اپنے آپ کو اپنی اولاد بیویوں کا حساب تو دیتے نہیں اور چلے ہیں باقیوں کا حساب لینے ۔ ایک استانی کے برطانیہ میں جائیدادیں ہیں اور پوچھنے پر سارے جج بھابھی بھابھی کرنے لگتے ہیں لعنت ہے ہر کالے کوٹ پر

 

[SIPRA]

Ultimately, everybody would get a clean chit, and Pakistan would be pronounced the most honest society, which ever existed on the face of the earth.

 

[TheSnakeEatingMarkhur]

Lahore Lahore aa.

 

[muhammadhafeezmalik]

جج کی بیوی نے حساب دے دیا جو باقی لوگ دیں ایسی عدلیہ پر ہزار لعنت ۔ یہ لوگ اپنے آپ کو اپنی اولاد بیویوں کا حساب تو دیتے نہیں اور چلے ہیں باقیوں کا حساب لینے ۔ ایک استانی کے برطانیہ میں جائیدادیں ہیں اور پوچھنے پر سارے جج بھابھی بھابھی کرنے لگتے ہیں لعنت ہے ہر کالے کوٹ پر

استانی کا اپنا کاروبار بھی تھا اور وہ نواب کھوسو کی بیٹی بھی تھی ، اس کی لندن پراپرٹی کی قیمت کراچی میں موجود پراپرٹی سے کم تھی ، اسی فیصد سے زیادہ پراپرٹی قاضی فائز عیسیٰ کے جج بننے سے پہلے کی تھی ، استانی عمران خان سے بہت پہلے سے باقاعدہ ٹیکس ادا کرتی تھی ، حکومت ایک مافیا کی طرح کام رہی تھی اس لئے ٹیکنیکل بنیادوں پر کیس لڑا گیا ورنہ کراچی سے لندن رقم منتقلی کے تمام ثبوت مہیا کردئے گئے ​

 

[Imran Khan]

استانی کا اپنا کاروبار بھی تھا اور وہ نواب کھوسو کی بیٹی بھی تھی ، اس کی لندن پراپرٹی کی قیمت کراچی میں موجود پراپرٹی سے کم تھی ، اسی فیصد سے زیادہ پراپرٹی قاضی فائز عیسیٰ کے جج بننے سے پہلے کی تھی ، استانی عمران خان سے بہت پہلے سے باقاعدہ ٹیکس ادا کرتی تھی ، حکومت ایک مافیا کی طرح کام رہی تھی اس لئے ٹیکنیکل بنیادوں پر کیس لڑا گیا ورنہ کراچی سے لندن رقم منتقلی کے تمام ثبوت مہیا کردئے گئے ​

پھر تو ایک ہی بات ہے یا پچھلے بنچ والے جج غلط تھے یا اس بنچ والے دونوں حالتوں میں جج ہی غلط ہیں

خاندان کے اثاثوں کے متعلق جج جواب دہ نہیں تو وزیراعظم اپنے خاندان کے اثاثوں سے متعلق کیوں جواب دہ ہوں؟​

 

[muhammadhafeezmalik]

پھر تو ایک ہی بات ہے یا پچھلے بنچ والے جج غلط تھے یا اس بنچ والے دونوں حالتوں میں جج ہی غلط ہیں

خاندان کے اثاثوں کے متعلق جج جواب دہ نہیں تو وزیراعظم اپنے خاندان کے اثاثوں سے متعلق کیوں جواب دہ ہوں؟​

جج کی بیوی جوابدہ ہے لیکن اسی قدر ہے جس قدر کوئی عام شہری ہے ، جب آپ پانچ سال سے زیادہ پرانے ٹیکس ریکارڈ سے متعلق عام شہری سے سوال نہیں کرسکتے تو جج کی بیوی سے بھی نہیں کرسکتے ، اگر آپ کو کوئی سوال کرنا تھا تو متعلقہ عرصے میں کرتے ، اگر آپ سپریم جیوڈیشل کونسل میں جانے سے پہلے جج کی بیوی کو وضاحت کا موقع دیتے تو آپ کی بدنیتی ثابت نہ ہوتی ، ایف بی آر نے تسلیم کیا کہ انہوں نے جج کی بیوی کوکوئی نوٹس نہیں دیا تھا ، جج کے بچوں کے اثاثوں کو جج کے ساتھ جوڑنے سے پہلے ان پیسوں کی پاکستان سے برطانیه منتقلی کے سبوت مہیا کرنا تھے اور یہ کوئی آفشور اثاثے نہیں تھے کہ جن سے متعلق برطانیه میں ان سے سوال نہیں ہوسکتا تھا ، برطانوی قانون کے مطابق انہیں ان کے ذرائع ان کی خرید سے پہلے بتانے ہوتے ہیں یا پھر این سی اے ضبط کرلیتی ہے ملک ریاض کی مثال آپ کے سامنے ہے​

 

[Enigma SIG]

Courts on a roll, acquitting everybody under the sun. Koi corruption nai horahi ye sb Niazi ko khwab aarahe hain!

 

[muhammadhafeezmalik]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1488076779671912448

 

[Imran Khan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1488076779671912448

saleem lifafi did nto say a word to judicial system lolllz

جج کی بیوی جوابدہ ہے لیکن اسی قدر ہے جس قدر کوئی عام شہری ہے ، جب آپ پانچ سال سے زیادہ پرانے ٹیکس ریکارڈ سے متعلق عام شہری سے سوال نہیں کرسکتے تو جج کی بیوی سے بھی نہیں کرسکتے ، اگر آپ کو کوئی سوال کرنا تھا تو متعلقہ عرصے میں کرتے ، اگر آپ سپریم جیوڈیشل کونسل میں جانے سے پہلے جج کی بیوی کو وضاحت کا موقع دیتے تو آپ کی بدنیتی ثابت نہ ہوتی ، ایف بی آر نے تسلیم کیا کہ انہوں نے جج کی بیوی کوکوئی نوٹس نہیں دیا تھا ، جج کے بچوں کے اثاثوں کو جج کے ساتھ جوڑنے سے پہلے ان پیسوں کی پاکستان سے برطانیه منتقلی کے سبوت مہیا کرنا تھے اور یہ کوئی آفشور اثاثے نہیں تھے کہ جن سے متعلق برطانیه میں ان سے سوال نہیں ہوسکتا تھا ، برطانوی قانون کے مطابق انہیں ان کے ذرائع ان کی خرید سے پہلے بتانے ہوتے ہیں یا پھر این سی اے ضبط کرلیتی ہے ملک ریاض کی مثال آپ کے سامنے ہے​

ustaniyaan UK main villaz bana rahi hain yahan per hairat hai

 

[muhammadhafeezmalik]

saleem lifafi did nto say a word to judicial system lolllz


ustaniyaan UK main villaz bana rahi hain yahan per hairat hai

She was senior school teacher at American School for 20 years, she must have handsome pay as she was paying more tax than PM Imran Khan and Shehzad Akbar in all those years, she is also daughter of Nawab Khoso and possessing hundreds acre of Agriculture land too. She transferred money through banking channels which she obtained by selling two properties in Karachi.