Is "Christianity" Really From Jesus Christ?

[Azadkashmir]

 

[Clutch]

No... Modern Christianity is more a construct of 4 people called Luke, Mark, John and Matthew.

Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, the authors attributed with the creation of the (new testament) bible.

 

[VCheng]

Religious discussions are not allowed on PDF.

 

[Big Tank]

Christianity (NT) is a invention of Paul the liar.

 

[SIPRA]

Religious discussions are not allowed on PDF.

Fully agree.
@Arsalan
@The Eagle
Kindly close this thread. It directly entails discussion on religion.

 

[Hamza913]

The NT isn't reliable, it was written by people who were not eye witnesses DECADES after Jesus' alleged "death" (peace be upon him), we don't know what methods they used to obtain their information (so we can't exactly determine that their sources were accurate), and it was originally written in Greek where as Jesus (peace be upon him) spoke Aramaic, a language which is wholly unrelated (this therefore brings up the whole issue of translations not always being accurate). Much of it is also based on the opinions of the writers themselves rather than what they claim Jesus (peace be upon him) said, and the NT has roughly 500,000 non-spelling textual variants.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...sed-estimate/0D19A713ACD4AC530525A1E12BF2106C

The concept of the Trinity is also ENTIRELY absent from the OT, which makes the claim that a Jewish Messiah would actually preach such an idea highly unlikely.

Fully agree.
@Arsalan
@The Eagle
Kindly close this thread. It directly entails discussion on religion.

It's a historical discussion.

 

[SIPRA]

The NT isn't reliable, it was written by people who were not eye witnesses DECADES after Jesus' alleged "death" (peace be upon him), we don't know what methods they used to obtain their information (so we can't exactly determine that their sources were accurate), and it was originally written in Greek where as Jesus (peace be upon him) spoke Aramaic, a language which is wholly unrelated (this therefore brings up the whole issue of translations not always being accurate). Much of it is also based on the opinions of the writers themselves rather than what they claim Jesus (peace be upon him) said, and the NT has roughly 500,000 non-spelling textual variants.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...sed-estimate/0D19A713ACD4AC530525A1E12BF2106C



It's more historical than religious. Nobody is discussing Christian doctrines.

I won't enter into a religious discussion. Discussing history of origin of an established religion is essentially discussing religion. If somebody starts discussing Islam in the same vein; I won't like it. So, I would refrain from it.

 

[Arsalan]

Lets not discuss religion. This usually do not end very well.
Thread Closed