What's new

Iran says Khan gave us the tech

EagleEyes

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
16,774
Reaction score
25
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
IAEA: Iran bought documents on enriching uranium
November 18, 2005

VIENNA, Austria-- Iran gave the U.N. nuclear monitoring agency documents it obtained on the black market that diplomats said Friday seemed to be part of a design for a nuclear warhead.

The papers obtained from a network run by a Pakistani scientist showed how to cast highly radioactive uranium into a form that could be used to build the core of an atomic bomb, the diplomats said.

The revelations came as Iran said it had begun converting a second batch of uranium into gas, a step that brings it closer to producing the enriched uranium used to either generate electricity or build bombs.

The European Union, with U.S. support, has been calling on Iran to halt conversion since August. But the nation's top nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, told state TV the country had started converting a second batch of uranium.

"This job is done and the plant is continuing its activity," Larijani said in the interview recorded late Thursday and broadcast Friday.

He added that Iran had informed the U.N.'s nuclear monitoring agency of the development.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said Friday that Iran received the detailed designs from the network run by Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear program. His network supplied Libya with information for its now-dismantled nuclear weapons program that included an engineer's drawing of an atomic bomb.

The document given to Iran showed how to cast "enriched, natural and depleted uranium metal into hemispherical forms," said a confidential IAEA report. IAEA officials refused to comment on the implications of the finding.

But diplomats close to the agency said it could indicate a design for the core of a nuclear warhead. The report said Iran insisted it had not asked for the designs but was given them anyway by members of the nuclear network-- something an official close to the agency said the IAEA was still investigating.

The diplomats requested anonymity in exchange for discussing the confidential report seen by The Associated Press. The document was prepared for Thursday's meeting of the IAEA's 35-nation board, which could decide to refer Tehran to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions for violating an international nuclear arms control treaty.

Most board nations are concerned that Iran has resumed uranium conversion-- a precursor to enrichment-- and has refused to meet all IAEA requests about a nuclear program that was clandestine for nearly 20 years until discovered three years ago.

The United States insists Iran is trying to make nuclear weapons, while Iran maintains its program is strictly for generating electricity.

The chief U.S. delegate to the IAEA, Gregory L. Schulte, said Washington was "very concerned" about the find, along with the "large cache of documents uncovered by the agency" showing detailed instructions on how to set up uranium enrichment facilities.

"This opens new concerns about weaponization that Iran has failed to address," he told reporters.

The report said Iran had handed over black-market documents revealing detailed instructions on setting up the complicated process of uranium enrichment. Khan has acknowledged selling secrets to Iran, Libya and North Korea.

One diplomat said on condition of anonymity that the information on designing the warhead core was less comprehensive than full documentation on how to make a weapon given Libya. But he said the find was important for the investigation of Iran's nuclear program and for an understanding of "what the network could offer" its customers.

Pakistan Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said the IAEA report contained no new information, and Pakistan had cooperated with IAEA investigators. She would not say to what extent Khan had cooperated with Iran to help it acquire nuclear technology.

The report also suggested Iran had something to hide, saying it continues to refuse access to a sensitive site where it could be storing equipment that could help investigators determine whether the military is running a secret nuclear program.

It said more transparency by Tehran was "indispensable and overdue" as agency inspectors try to determine if Iran's military secretly ran its own nuclear program parallel to a civilian one.

Inspectors needed access both to more details on Iran's enrichment activities and a site where it is believed to be warehousing equipment that could be used in a weapons program, the document said.

"There still remain issues to be resolved" in connection with whether the military was supplied with centrifuge technology in the mid-1990s and then conducted secret enrichment activities between 1995 and 2002, it said.

The report said the key outstanding issues concerning Iran's nuclear program include whether the military was involved in enrichment, access to the military site where the "dual use" equipment was believed held and greater access to individuals involved in the enrichment program.

"Transparency measures should include the provision of information and documentation related to the procurement of dual-use equipment and permitting visits to relevant military-owned workshops and R&D locations thought run by the military," the report said.

The agency is "still awaiting additional visits," both to the military site at Lavisan-Shian, just outside Tehran, and to Parchin, which IAEA inspectors visited for the second time a few weeks ago.

Larijani said Iran refused to give inspectors access to Lavisan, on the northeastern outskirts of Tehran, last month.

"To visit some places, the inspectors' wish is not sufficient. They cannot force Iran to allow a visit to any place, particularly in military areas," Larijani said.

Source: http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/iran18b.html
 
I can't believe it. Khan gave them the technology how to build them, now they have submitted the information to UN inspectors. Although they would still have the copies of it, and will surely use it in the future.

But they have betrayed us!

Should now Iran consider as a friend! :ranting:
 
Iran moves to block U.N. nuclear inspections
Sunday, November 20, 2005; Posted: 10:12 a.m. EST (15:12 GMT)

Iran resumed uranium reprocessing activities at its Isfahan facility in August.

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Parliament approved a bill Sunday requiring the government to block international inspections of its atomic facilities if the U.N. nuclear monitoring agency refers Iran to the Security Council for possible sanctions.

The bill was approved by 183 of the 197 lawmakers present at the session, which was broadcast live on state-run radio. The vote came four days before the International Atomic Energy Agency board meets to consider referring Tehran for violating a nuclear arms control treaty.

When the bill becomes law, as is expected, it will strengthen the government's hand in resisting international pressure to abandon uranium enrichment, a process that can be used to produce fuel for nuclear reactors or an atomic bomb.

The United States accuses Iran of trying to build a nuclear weapon. Iran says its program is for generating electricity.

The bill will go to the Guardian Council, a hard-line constitutional watchdog, for expected ratification.

"If Iran's nuclear file is referred or reported to the U.N. Security Council, the government will be required to cancel all voluntary measures it has taken and implement all scientific, research and executive programs to enable the rights of the nation under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty," lawmaker Kazem Jalali quoted the bill as saying.

Canceling voluntary measures means Iran will stop allowing IAEA inspections of its nuclear facilities and would resume uranium enrichment.

Iran resumed uranium reprocessing activities -- a step before enrichment -- at its Isfahan Uranium Conversion Facility in August but said it preferred a negotiated solution to begin uranium enrichment.

Under an additional protocol to the treaty, Iran has been allowing IAEA inspectors to carry out short-notice inspections of its nuclear facilities. Iran has signed the protocol but never ratified it.

The United States and European Union want Iran to permanently halt uranium enrichment. But Tehran says the nonproliferation treaty allows it to pursue a nuclear program for peaceful purposes, adding it will never give up the right to enrich uranium to produce nuclear fuel.

The 35-member IAEA board of governors meets Thursday. In a preparatory report, the U.N. agency found that Iran received detailed nuclear designs from a black-market network run by Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of Pakistan's atomic program. Diplomats say those designs appear to be blueprints for the core of a nuclear warhead.

Khan's network supplied Libya with information for its now-dismantled nuclear weapons program that included an engineer's drawing of an atomic bomb.

The document given to Iran in 1987 showed how to cast "enriched, natural and depleted uranium metal into hemispherical forms," said the confidential IAEA report.

Iran sought Sunday to blunt potential international action over its nuclear program, labeling the report about its blueprints "baseless."

"This is just a media speculation," Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said. "It is baseless."

Source: http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/11/20/...r.ap/index.html
 
Wow. Iran is turning the heat on Pakistan. I wonder how the Pakistani Regime will respond.
 
Originally posted by Srirangan@Nov 23 2005, 04:42 PM
Wow. Iran is turning the heat on Pakistan. I wonder how the Pakistani Regime will respond.
[post=3519]Quoted post[/post]​

Sri dont get happy I have heard that there are about 13 processes after which a country can make a nuke.Knowhow of only one process is transfered to Iran But Pakistan shoudnt belive on its western neighbours i.e., Iran and Afghanistan.What Iran can do they can only enrich uranium nothing else then that why US wants to stop them from doing that.Every country should have right to produce inexpensive energy which could meets its future energy needs
 
Why should I get happy? Or sad? Iran is a headache for India too considering the Communist Parties of India (agents of China) are making this into a political issue here.
 
thats totally bullshit! :ranting: :ranting:
y pakistan will do such idiotic thing??
they are putting all the blame on AQ Khan n thats straight up unjustified.
 
Originally posted by Srirangan@Nov 23 2005, 07:39 PM
Why should I get happy? Or sad? Iran is a headache for India too considering the Communist Parties of India (agents of China) are making this into a political issue here.
[post=3528]Quoted post[/post]​

Grapes are Sour :eyebrow: isant it India was an ally of Iran then it turned its back when INDO-US relations began to strenthen
 
We didn't turn the back. We did what we thought was right. It's never black and white buddy. Do you really want a nuclear Iran?

And they say Iran needed nuclear technology for energy production. Now that is the biggest load of BS because Iran is sitting on top for one of the largest oil reserves in the world. That is sufficient not only for Iran but 1/4th's of the wrold. I ask you again, does Pakistan want a nuclear Iran?
 
Originally posted by Srirangan@Nov 24 2005, 07:17 AM
We didn't turn the back. We did what we thought was right. It's never black and white buddy. Do you really want a nuclear Iran?

And they say Iran needed nuclear technology for energy production. Now that is the biggest load of BS because Iran is sitting on top for one of the largest oil reserves in the world. That is sufficient not only for Iran but 1/4th's of the wrold. I ask you again, does Pakistan want a nuclear Iran?
[post=3567]Quoted post[/post]​

:scared: I cant say any thing really but if they want to get energy they shouldnt be stoped :ranting:
 
Originally posted by kashifshahzad@Nov 24 2005, 02:21 PM
:scared: I cant say any thing really but if they want to get energy they shouldnt be stoped :ranting:
[post=3574]Quoted post[/post]​
They have billions of tonnes of oil. They can pump that. A nuclear Iran is not in the best interests of Pakistan, India and the Middle East. Atleast not yet.
 
Originally posted by Srirangan@Nov 24 2005, 09:33 AM
They have billions of tonnes of oil. They can pump that. A nuclear Iran is not in the best interests of Pakistan, India and the Middle East. Atleast not yet.
[post=3594]Quoted post[/post]​

Why not India? I thought they both have good relations dont they? :eyebrow:
 
Originally posted by WebMaster@Nov 26 2005, 10:27 AM
Why not India? I thought they both have good relations dont they? :eyebrow:
[post=3717]Quoted post[/post]​
We have good relations, infact great relations. But we don't want them to go nuclear, hence we voted against. India's vote was in Iran's larger interests.
 
Originally posted by Srirangan@Nov 26 2005, 12:56 AM
We have good relations, infact great relations. But we don't want them to go nuclear, hence we voted against. India's vote was in Iran's larger interests.
[post=3719]Quoted post[/post]​

It doesn't make sense, if both have good relations why India sees nuclear Iran as a threat?
 
Originally posted by WebMaster@Nov 26 2005, 12:23 PM
It doesn't make sense, if both have good relations why India sees nuclear Iran as a threat?
[post=3720]Quoted post[/post]​
Good relations does not mean, give them the nukes. Think long term.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom