What's new

Iran Fined $ 2.2 Billion for Bombing

longbrained

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
3,390
Reaction score
0
The amount to be paid to American victims of the bombing from Iranian assets frozen in US since Iranian revolution including money, property as well as by selling of Iranian owned Persian Antiquities.


Judge awards $2.2B for Beirut attack on Marines

The Associated Press: Judge awards $2.2B for Beirut attack on Marines

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge has awarded $2.16 billion to victims of the 1983 suicide truck-bombing of U.S. Marines in Beirut, his third award in two weeks to plaintiffs who had sued Iran over the attack.
The money will be difficult to collect, but the victims hope to obtain it from Iranian assets frozen in the United States.
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth awarded the money Friday to estates of dead Marines and to injured Marines and their relatives. Two days ago, he awarded $44.6 million to two servicemen who were injured and their family members. And last week, he awarded $33.3 million to family members of two injured servicemen.
Iran has been blamed for supporting the militant group Hezbollah, which carried out the bombing.
In Friday's ruling, Lamberth awarded $487 million in compensatory damages and $1.67 billion in punitive damages to about 180 victims and estates.
A lawyer for the victims, Thomas Fortune Fay, said that he has attached nearly $2 billion in Iranian assets in a Citibank account in New York, which Iran's central bank is fighting. Including Friday's ruling, Lambert has awarded more than $7 billion to victims of the 1983 attack from Iran, and Fay has represented nearly all of them. He said that to date, none of his clients have received money from the awards. Fay said that the victims have agreed to share whatever they get proportionately.
In a 2009 opinion, Lamberth urged the president and Congress to consider a terrorism claims settlement commission that would give federal compensation to the victims and suggest a settlement plan with Iran in case the two nations ever resume relations. There has been no action on that.
A message left with the Iranian Embassy to the United Nations was not returned Friday.
In another ruling Friday, Lamberth awarded $315 million from Sudan to sailors who were injured in the USS Cole attack in 2000 and to some of their spouses. The judge wrote that "Sudan's support of al-Qaida has a 'reasonable connection'" to damages suffered by the sailors. A message left at the Sudanese Embassy in Washington was not immediately returned.
The USS Cole attack left 17 sailors dead.
 
.
They have no proof Iran was directly involved, therefore these charges would be challenged and dismissed if countries resume their relationships.

However there is 100% proof US shot down Iran's civilian plane, therefore Iran's court should charge US for 50 billion., if countries resume their relationships. :azn: Or how about damages for illegal sanctions based on fake pretenses? Or the fact US supplied WMD to Hussein to use against Iran? In other words, US could be charged for its endless crimes over and over again.
 
.
They have no proof Iran was directly involved, therefore these charges would be challenged and dismissed if countries resume their relationships.

However there is 100% proof US shot down Iran's civilian plane, therefore Iran's court should charge US for 50 billion., if countries resume their relationships. :azn: Or how about damages for illegal sanctions based on fake pretenses? Or the fact US supplied WMD to Hussein to use against Iran? In other words, US could be charged for its endless crimes over and over again.

That is a wonderful idea. Iranians should also charge for WWII occupation despite Iran's neutrality, Operation Ajax, and stealing of Iran's oil from 1903 to 1979. The total amount would be tens of trillions of dollars.
 
.
This is white man way of stealing money from weaker nations! not surprised!

What about the Iranian civil airliner shot by US on purpose or aiding Saddam to bomb thousand of Iranians?

There is an alternate side of the conflict. The west cannot have economic recovery without cheap energy and a case is being built against Iran to invade and steal oil.
 
.
This is white man way of stealing money from weaker nations! not surprised!

What about the Iranian civil airliner shot by US on purpose or aiding Saddam to bomb thousand of Iranians?

There is an alternate side of the conflict. The west cannot have economic recovery without cheap energy and a case is being built against Iran to invade and steal oil.

I'm not sure I understand you, why the change of heart about Iran? ;)
 
. . . . . . . . . .
However there is 100% proof US shot down Iran's civilian plane, therefore Iran's court should charge US for 50 billion., if countries resume their relationships. :azn: Or how about damages for illegal sanctions based on fake pretenses? Or the fact US supplied WMD to Hussein to use against Iran? In other words, US could be charged for its endless crimes over and over again.

Relatives of drone victims in Pakistan should take note.

This obviously has nothing to do with "justice".

If the USA was really interested in justice, they would compensate Iran for shooting down their civilian airliner, they would compensate Pakistan for the drone attacks, and they would ressurect the 1 million Iraqi civilians who died due to their "WMD" lies.

And they would also give their entire country back to the true owners, i.e. the Native Americans.

Instead, this is simply a case of the former colonialists (i.e. The West) continuing their old tradition of plundering and pillaging the Civilizations of Asia.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom