What's new

Intel’s Optane SSD is 7x faster than today’s solid state drives

Hamartia Antidote

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
35,188
Reaction score
30
Country
United States
Location
United States
Intel’s Optane SSD is 7x faster than today’s solid state drives | Chips | Geek.com

Today’s solid states drives are already quite fast, but tomorrow’s will be even faster. More than seven times faster in the case of Intel’s new Optane SSDs.

Intel gave the public its first look at Optane yesterday at IDF 2015. Like Samsung’s mammoth 16TB SSD, Optane drives owe part of their performance boost by going three-dimensional. Intel refers to their take as 3D XPoint (cross-point) technology, and it was developed in conjunction with the memory experts at Micron.

Their goal was to develop something that was inexpensive and non-volatile like NAND that also boasted performance that was more on par with DRAM. 3D XPoint comes impressively close: it’s capable of speeds about 1,000 times faster than today’s NAND.

They also reduced latency. In fact, they nearly eliminated it. Intel says the latency of 3D XPoint drives can be measured in nanoseconds — as opposed to milliseconds like today’s SSDs. So not only can Intel’s new SSDs transfer information at a blistering pace, they can locate it in a flash, too.

3D XPoint doesn’t just boost speed: it increases storage density, too. Its stacked design keeps things compact, and the memory doesn’t need to make room for transistors — which DRAM uses to perform reads and writes. Instead, 3D XPoint can read from or write to individual memory cells by simply altering voltages.

Today’s solid states drives are already quite fast, but tomorrow’s will be even faster. More than seven times faster in the case of Intel’s new Optane SSDs.

Intel gave the public its first look at Optane yesterday at IDF 2015. Like Samsung’s mammoth 16TB SSD, Optane drives owe part of their performance boost by going three-dimensional. Intel refers to their take as 3D XPoint (cross-point) technology, and it was developed in conjunction with the memory experts at Micron.

Their goal was to develop something that was inexpensive and non-volatile like NAND that also boasted performance that was more on par with DRAM. 3D XPoint comes impressively close: it’s capable of speeds about 1,000 times faster than today’s NAND.

They also reduced latency. In fact, they nearly eliminated it. Intel says the latency of 3D XPoint drives can be measured in nanoseconds — as opposed to milliseconds like today’s SSDs. So not only can Intel’s new SSDs transfer information at a blistering pace, they can locate it in a flash, too.

3D XPoint doesn’t just boost speed: it increases storage density, too. Its stacked design keeps things compact, and the memory doesn’t need to make room for transistors — which DRAM uses to perform reads and writes. Instead, 3D XPoint can read from or write to individual memory cells by simply altering voltages.

How much more storage does that let Intel and Micron cram into the same area? About ten times as much. Theoretically, then, Intel should be able to turn out a drive very soon that packs even more storage than Samsung’s new 16TB behemoth.

And just for good measure, Intel and Micron made 3D XPoint more durable. They say a drive’s lifespan “is not significantly impacted” by the number of writes it performs. That should mean these drives will last like a hard drive while outperforming SSDs and selling for a better price.

Sounds great, right? Now we just have to wait for them to show up on store shelves.

 
.
wouldn't this saturate sata express 10/Gbs?
 
.
wouldn't this saturate sata express 10/Gbs?

Rate of Storage and Rate of Transfer are different aspect. It could be quicker for packed 3D -Xpoint transfer but I doubt they can go over current SATA 3.2 Version speed (16Gbit/s)

Depends on how quick actually is for the 3D Cross Point, they may or may not need to bring out a newer gen SATA
 
.
Rate of Storage and Rate of Transfer are different aspect. It could be quicker for packed 3D -Xpoint transfer but I doubt they can go over current SATA 3.2 Version speed (16Gbit/s)

Depends on how quick actually is for the 3D Cross Point, they may or may not need to bring out a newer gen SATA
As of now, this technology will be independent of connection type. I know a few guys at Intel Folsom. :enjoy:
 
.
As of now, this technology will be independent of connection type. I know a few guys at Intel Folsom. :enjoy:

That means they are either faster than the current technology or they are yet to decide which way the device is going to port to lol.
 
.
That means they are either faster than the current technology or they are yet to decide which way the device is going to port to lol.
3D XPoint is a brand new memory technology, and I do mean brand new. It is as different from the well known NAND as NAND memory type is different from DRAM.

To simplify things a bit...

DRAM uses a capacitor to store a charge, which is a memory bit, which mean loss of memory when there is no power.

NAND flash memory essentially traps an electron via Fowler-Nordheim (FN) tunneling, or quantum physics tunneling, to store a memory bit, which mean memory is retained when there is no power. The downside is that the structure that retains the electron gets worn down over time with repeated erase/write operation. This structure breakdown is why NAND have limited erase/write cycles.

I know that others came out with memristor, RAMBUS, phase change, and several more memory types that claimed to revolutionize computers and computing in general. But so far, none of them have panned out due to difficulties in mass production techniques. HP gave up on memristor earlier this yr.

What Intel-Micron did was a complete departure from these two established memory types. 3D XPoint is not an improvement nor is it an evolution of them. It is completely different. Memory is stored via material manipulation so there is no memory loss like DRAM when there is no power, and there is no structure breakdown like NAND because the erase/write cycle does not employ FN tunneling. Internally, XPoint will be faster than NAND but slower than DRAM, so under many computer systems, there will be no need for DRAM to work with the CPU. Essentially, you will have to adjust to the new paradigm that there is no need for DRAM. There will be just an array of XPoint memory, say 1TB worth, and it will be completely transparent to the user. How small will this array of 1TB of XPoint memory ? About the size of a standard DRAM stick.

So far, 3D XPoint seems to be the exception to previous attempts at replacing NAND. That is all I will say for now.
 
.
Well about that 16gb/s , don't forget thats the theoretical speed not the actual speed .
 
.
Rate of Storage and Rate of Transfer are different aspect. It could be quicker for packed 3D -Xpoint transfer but I doubt they can go over current SATA 3.2 Version speed (16Gbit/s)

Depends on how quick actually is for the 3D Cross Point, they may or may not need to bring out a newer gen SATA

They should connect it directly to PCI express.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom