India's lies can fight the world. What a crazy lie!

[SBUS-CXK]

Wow, look at the Indian propaganda.

for @MagicMarker

for me

for @MagicMarker

for me

Now is the focus!! for @MagicMarker

for me

Of course, Indians are still Indians. No surprise.

So I have been repeating international common sense and UN resolutions, but this India friend has always insisted on India propaganda. What a great publicity!

OK, I repeat international common sense and UN resolutions, so I am a robot. So Indians think the world is a robot! What a powerful mouth!

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Oh, finally...

for @MagicMarker

OMG.... Maybe. The United Nations lies??

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758

 

[nang2]

China was never an outcast of UN. There has always been a Chinese government sitting at its UN permanent security council seat.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Do you think Indian mouths can be believed? Vote, please.

@eldarlmari @AViet @seesonic @Mrc @rott @Daniel808 @TaiShang @Götterdämmerung @Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @PashtunBradar @Bilal9 @Tresbon @oprih @khansaheeb @Dalit @Ashik Mahmud @pakeye
@I S I @Pluralist @Major Sam @Homo Sapiens

 

[MagicMarker]

China was never an outcast of UN. There has always been a Chinese government sitting at its UN permanent security council seat.

You are confusing ROC with PRC.

Till 1971 it was ROC i.e Taiwan which held the permanent seat in the UN.

It was only after the visit of Nixon and Kissinger in 71 that the seat was transferred to PRC from Taiwan.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

You are confusing ROC with PRC.

Till 1971 it was ROC i.e Taiwan which held the permanent seat in the UN.

It was only after the visit of Nixon and Kissinger in 71 that the seat was transferred to PRC from Taiwan.

What is the problem? This shows that China has been a member of the UN Security Council since 1945. LOL, the last hope of India is destroyed by you.

 

[nang2]

You are confusing ROC with PRC.

Till 1971 it was ROC i.e Taiwan which held the permanent seat in the UN.

It was only after the visit of Nixon and Kissinger in 71 that the seat was transferred to PRC from Taiwan.

both are Chinese governments. the only debate was about which government should take the seat. it is always a Chinese government that represents China.

 

[Chakar The Great]

What else can be expected from these low IQ indian members here, propaganda is bread and butter for them. They listen to propaganda and than spread it to international community not realizing that audience here is not indian public.

So its neither surprising nor unexpected. Also when you defeat them with logic , they shamelessly walk away or change topic.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

You are confusing ROC with PRC.

Till 1971 it was ROC i.e Taiwan which held the permanent seat in the UN.

It was only after the visit of Nixon and Kissinger in 71 that the seat was transferred to PRC from Taiwan.

Oh, by the way, you say these... USSR, France, UK. Do they know?

 

[MagicMarker]

both are China. the only debate was about which government should take the seat. it is always a chinese government.

No, both are not the same.

US still recognize Taiwan as a separate political unit, though on paper it agrees with one china policy.

US consistently blocked PRC from taking over the seat in the UN till 1971 while India consistently supported PRC for that seat.

1971 visit by Nixon and Kissinger and corresponding agreements with PRC is what changed the status.

 

[nang2]

No, both are not the same.

US still recognize Taiwan as a separate political unit, though on paper it agrees with one china policy.

US consistently blocked PRC from taking over the seat in the UN till 1971 while India consistently supported PRC for that seat.

1971 visit by Nixon and Kissinger and corresponding agreements with PRC is what changed the status.

I didn't say they are the same. I said they represent the same country.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

No, both are not the same.

US still recognize Taiwan as a separate political unit, though on paper it agrees with one china policy.

US consistently blocked PRC from taking over the seat in the UN till 1971 while India consistently supported PRC for that seat.

1971 visit by Nixon and Kissinger and corresponding agreements with PRC is what changed the status.

I'm sorry to tell you a common sense again.

Any country establishing diplomatic relations with China must abide by the "one China" principle.

Of course, in any case, the UN Security Council has nothing to do with India.

No, both are not the same.

US still recognize Taiwan as a separate political unit, though on paper it agrees with one china policy.

US consistently blocked PRC from taking over the seat in the UN till 1971 while India consistently supported PRC for that seat.

1971 visit by Nixon and Kissinger and corresponding agreements with PRC is what changed the status.

But it doesn't matter. You are an Indian, and your lies can be against the world.

You can prove it in any way - the Republic of China is not China. But the United Nations Security Council still has nothing to do with India.

 

[Chakar The Great]

I'm sorry to tell you a common sense again.

Any country establishing diplomatic relations with China must abide by the "one China" principle.

Of course, in any case, the UN Security Council has nothing to do with India.

India's own track record in security council is shameful. Resolution on Kashmir is still awaiting practical implementation . Its pathetic that they talk about UN, they themselves being the biggest violator of security council resolutions.