SSG-Korea
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Many Pakistani CSS Officers and Bureaucratic officer annually getting training's from EU/UK/USA/China and now since from ten years Korea is also providing training about public policy, Development and role of active bureaucracy system in Pakistan. However, if Pakistani bureaucracy is seems very less effective about learning lesson regarding international development, with no ownership of state department or resources and highly corrupt in the Pakistan.
However, if you looks towards, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan or China, they developed their country with strong bureaucracy which make them as servant to public, least of corruption and active to support public department in their countries and investors from outsiders. Which even shocked western world about their quick reforms. Let me share one Example with you. Hyundai is not only Automobile company but it developed steel mill, housing, ships, arms, electric and other items but it was supported by Korean Govt in start and it now providing his cash support in education, development, economical reforms in Korea. Korea first was adopted five years plan from Pakistan and it implemented it and developed on ground with his bureaucracy and successfully completed it. Korean Bureaucracy is not very Good but active and creative and it owns state departments in Korea.
The Pakistan Bureaucracy system is coming from new youth but less effective and highly less active, very politicize and fully corrupt. Pakistan, Health, Education, Law, Revenue, Police, Transport, Energy, Information, Labor, statics , commerce, religious and finally industrial bureaucracy is seems dead and corrupt. Bureaucrats are likely to be corrupt if they have the opportunity to be corrupt and if the expected cost of corruption for the bureaucrat is smaller than the expected gain. Developing countries generally have much higher corruption
than advanced countries because the state typically occupies a strategic positions and less monitoring effective in the Pakistan.The consequences of bureaucratic and political corruption in Pakistan are widely recognized to have been extremely damaging. these types of corruption to be the creation of value-reducing rents (transfers to favored clients, monopolistic restrictions which help particular individuals, and so on) a reduction in the stability of property rights, lowered investment, and a misallocation of public resources. The relative importance of different types of problems created by corruption and its impact on different sections of the population cannot be directly measured. However, opinion surveys generally show that the public considers corruption by the police and by the lower judiciary to be the most onerous types of corruption. These types of corruption take place both because of inadequate or dysfunctional capacity within the police and judiciary, as well as inadequate internal monitoring. Thus given the shortages of staff, to get the police to investigate a burglary or the judiciary to expedite a land dispute case in court, even otherwise honest citizens may have to bribe. On the other hand, corruption of these types is also driven by lack of adequate monitoring and accountability, so that for instance, interested parties within the public may directly seek rents by using the police or the judiciary to seize land illegally or to avoid criminal charges following a theft. While corruption in the police and lower judiciary impacts on millions. It is just one example but currently Pakistan is full of such example from bottom to head.
Every Pakistani is crying on corruption and even Korean steel company is stuck up and it demand bribed millions of dollars for Electricity bills and now her case in high court and company looking close it industry in Pakistan due bribing and using force bureaucracy against company.
Thus, Pakistan need reforms, strong anti corruption policies, monitoring and accountability and complain and take actions against corrupts bureaucratic officers in the Pakistan are required to stop corruption in all departments.First, there has to be much greater clarity about the objectives of government as identified by the highest levels of the reforming leadership. Our extensive interviews revealed a wide gap between the theoretical requirement of policy coherence and the reality where different departments and levels of the bureaucracy, political respondents and representatives of civil society, each identified different areas of bureaucratic and political corruption which were most important, and different areas where government service delivery should concentrate.
However, if you looks towards, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan or China, they developed their country with strong bureaucracy which make them as servant to public, least of corruption and active to support public department in their countries and investors from outsiders. Which even shocked western world about their quick reforms. Let me share one Example with you. Hyundai is not only Automobile company but it developed steel mill, housing, ships, arms, electric and other items but it was supported by Korean Govt in start and it now providing his cash support in education, development, economical reforms in Korea. Korea first was adopted five years plan from Pakistan and it implemented it and developed on ground with his bureaucracy and successfully completed it. Korean Bureaucracy is not very Good but active and creative and it owns state departments in Korea.
The Pakistan Bureaucracy system is coming from new youth but less effective and highly less active, very politicize and fully corrupt. Pakistan, Health, Education, Law, Revenue, Police, Transport, Energy, Information, Labor, statics , commerce, religious and finally industrial bureaucracy is seems dead and corrupt. Bureaucrats are likely to be corrupt if they have the opportunity to be corrupt and if the expected cost of corruption for the bureaucrat is smaller than the expected gain. Developing countries generally have much higher corruption
than advanced countries because the state typically occupies a strategic positions and less monitoring effective in the Pakistan.The consequences of bureaucratic and political corruption in Pakistan are widely recognized to have been extremely damaging. these types of corruption to be the creation of value-reducing rents (transfers to favored clients, monopolistic restrictions which help particular individuals, and so on) a reduction in the stability of property rights, lowered investment, and a misallocation of public resources. The relative importance of different types of problems created by corruption and its impact on different sections of the population cannot be directly measured. However, opinion surveys generally show that the public considers corruption by the police and by the lower judiciary to be the most onerous types of corruption. These types of corruption take place both because of inadequate or dysfunctional capacity within the police and judiciary, as well as inadequate internal monitoring. Thus given the shortages of staff, to get the police to investigate a burglary or the judiciary to expedite a land dispute case in court, even otherwise honest citizens may have to bribe. On the other hand, corruption of these types is also driven by lack of adequate monitoring and accountability, so that for instance, interested parties within the public may directly seek rents by using the police or the judiciary to seize land illegally or to avoid criminal charges following a theft. While corruption in the police and lower judiciary impacts on millions. It is just one example but currently Pakistan is full of such example from bottom to head.
Every Pakistani is crying on corruption and even Korean steel company is stuck up and it demand bribed millions of dollars for Electricity bills and now her case in high court and company looking close it industry in Pakistan due bribing and using force bureaucracy against company.
Thus, Pakistan need reforms, strong anti corruption policies, monitoring and accountability and complain and take actions against corrupts bureaucratic officers in the Pakistan are required to stop corruption in all departments.First, there has to be much greater clarity about the objectives of government as identified by the highest levels of the reforming leadership. Our extensive interviews revealed a wide gap between the theoretical requirement of policy coherence and the reality where different departments and levels of the bureaucracy, political respondents and representatives of civil society, each identified different areas of bureaucratic and political corruption which were most important, and different areas where government service delivery should concentrate.