Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i wrote a small piece on APC held last week, it is being edited, hope it gets publish, I have highlighted that how Political & Military leadership upheld Peace process through dialogue but they missed one thing - and that was to send a message that this decision of theirs should not be taken for granted and there should be no doubt in anyone's doubt that we are weak.He emphasized again that while it is understandable to give peace a chance through a political process but no one should have any misgivings that we would let terrorists coerce us into accepting their terms. Army has the ability and the will to take the fight to the terrorists.
[/B]
As faujis naak ki seedh may sochtay hain, therefore they fail to understand that in every talks maximum conditions and demands are put forwards by both parties. You start talks on the basis of those demands , the final agreement is much different from pre-conditions.
If you are expecting immediate ceasefire, laying down of arms, surrender and them accepting your constitution and writ of state then why you even need dialogues with them if they already surrender?
Those who ask why we need to talk with killers of 40000 civilians and 10000 security forces? The answer is also on same pattren, you didnt need to have talks with taliban if they had not killed so many soldiers and civilians and were law abiding citizen....instead of getting eliminated, they have grown powerful after decade long war thats why sensible and maturd pakistanis want to solve the problem other than military action.
@nuclearpak, @Armstrong, @Hyperion, @mafiya, @balixd @Slav Defence @F.O.X @Last Hope, @Icarus, @Xeric, @TaimiKhan you think tanks agree with me?
@Armstrong
Lala I never was against Talks - though i have my own way of Peace process.
talking about first para than my dear you are looking at it the wrong way. Taliban are standing against the state, they are not standing against the foreign enemy. Infact it is the other way around, they are the invading force, who want to force their way on us. It is not their fault, its the psyche, they always fought against the foreign forces, in Chechnya they fought against Soviets, in Afghanistan they fought against Soviets, than again they fought US.
Hence they are putting forward their pre-conditions against the state in this manner. It is the job of Political leadership to put them back to their place that it is them who are anti-state and we reject your pre-conditions.
It is us doing taliban a favor by giving them a chance not the other way around. But the political leadership is so pathetic and spinelss
As faujis naak ki seedh may sochtay hain, therefore they fail to understand that in every talks maximum conditions and demands are put forwards by both parties. You start talks on the basis of those demands , the final agreement is much different from pre-conditions.
If you are expecting immediate ceasefire, laying down of arms, surrender and them accepting your constitution and writ of state then why you even need dialogues with them if they already surrender?
Those who ask why we need to talk with killers of 40000 civilians and 10000 security forces? The answer is also on same pattren, you didnt need to have talks with taliban if they had not killed so many soldiers and civilians and were law abiding citizen....instead of getting eliminated, they have grown powerful after decade long war thats why sensible and maturd pakistanis want to solve the problem other than military action.
@nuclearpak, @Armstrong, @Hyperion, @mafiya, @balixd @Slav Defence @F.O.X @Last Hope, @Icarus, @Xeric, @TaimiKhan you think tanks agree with me?
@Armstrong
Enforcing sharia on islamabad was priority of tehreek nifaz e shariat of swat, killing shias is priority of LEJ and LET. The waziristan based TTP might talk about sharia and all that but thats to give legitamacy to their movement and satisfy their allies. They do not have any territorial ambitions beyond FATA.
Are they invaders? No, they are your own people, you allow them to keep weapons in the first place, praised their love and valour for islam and motivated them to become jihadis to help their afghan brothers against soviets. You opened thousands of madrassas in their areas and turned FATA into training ground for mujahideen. You also send them to help taliban against northern alliance. After 9/11 you angered them on taking u-turn on afghanistan and on top of that send faujis to waziristan and at the point of gun you asked them to hand over arab settlers of afghan war era so that they can be handed over to FBI in exchange for dollars. The same arabs who were praised by you and CIA. On mere hesitation you started bombing them. Your every brutal action force them to come up with more violent tactic. Taliban were weak and against powerful, weak always resorted to terrorism, to tactics like suicide bombing. Its army which made them terrorists, for dollars.
Good.RAW must help TTP achieve the creation of the islamic emirate of Waziristan. We must set up training camps in Afghanistan to train TTP operatives and arm them with chemical weaponry too to carry out chemical attacks in Pakistani Punjab. It will make Western powers feel Pakistan nukes are insecure and West will use special forces to destroy it.
Pakistan will be dispatched into civil war and soon be balkanized .The Islamic emirate of Waziristan ,Balochistan socialist republic and the rump state of Pakistan will be created. Also ,we can repeat another 1971 soon.RAW should work alongside Mossad in destroying pakistani nukes with the use of proxies like TTP and BLA.