What's new

Fruits of Revenge

ahmedchaudry

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Fruits of Revenge


by Br. Shahid Mahmud

The defeat of 1971 left a lasting mark on the psyche of the Pakistan
Army. But promising a 'never again' was not enough as it sought to
find ways to take revenge from the Indian army. Never again would
have meant to simply avoid the conflict and never get in a situation
where enemy would repeat the crushing blow that led to break up of
Pakistan and creation of Bangladesh.

The army never recognized the real enemy - the enemy within. A lot
has been written about Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto's role in undermining the
credibility of army going all the way back to Operation Gibraltar
that plunged Pakistan into a war it never expected, could ill-afford
it and was lucky to come out unscathed. The disaster of 1971 was
Bhutto and Army's own making, never having learned any lesson from
1965.

Thinking he had finally buried the army under heaps of insult
following the surrender in Dhaka, the civilian Martial Law, Zulfiqar
Ali Bhutto, went about ensuring that he would reign forever. Army,
subdued but never stored away, never forgot any of that. While Bhutto
was chasing his political opponents into assassinations, or with
better luck of the victims, into self-imposed political exiles, the
army plotted and planned. The coup of 1977 followed army's backing of
the opposition parties where a hodge-podge of otherwise dagger-drawn
political parties was put together with only one point agenda -
removal of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. The agitation was sold to the people
as 'Tehrik-e-Nizam-e-Mustafa.'

It is difficult to pinpoint a turning point, but over the years, the
religious right has completely redefined Pakistan and its reason for
existence in the hearts of minds of educated middle-class. This
element had no love lost for the progressive Pakistan and its
moderate founders. The lower classes largely made up of uneducated
young men had found a spokesman in Bhutto who betrayed them but they
still refuse to believe it. In either case, Pakistan was now in the
hands of a new generation which either looked inward into their
narrow self-interests, or a religious elite whose loyalty was to its
bearded leaders and not Pakistan.

The invasion of Afghanistan by the Soviets played into the hands of
the Pakistan army. The resistance to the occupation, with the
connivance of the Americans and rest of the Europe was
declared 'Jihad.' Insiders know that Jihadis destroyed every
signature of modernity in Afghanistan. Worse, the most extremists in
religion got most of the American and Pakistan military aid. Till his
last breath, Ahmed Shah Masood complained that he got very few arms
and Gulbadeen Hikmatyar the most while the former did most of the
fighting.

Zia-ul-Haq died after having completely redoing Pakistan. Textbooks
of Pakistan now reflected a great 'Islamic' past which was only a
part of the bigger picture. The innocent stories from the villages of
Pakistan which adorned the Urdu textbooks were replaced by either
half-truths of 'Sahaba', or tales of miracles by this Alim or that
Sufi. If it had been possible, Zia would have imported all the sand
in Saudi Arabia to make Pakistan look alike. Pakistan's own culture
rooted in the region disappeared from the pages of these books.

When Zia-ul-Haq finally was put away by an invisible hand, Army and
the religious elite were hand in glove and the democratic governments
of Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif could not face them head on. If
anything, democratic governments, to appease these elements,
continued to take country towards religious extremism. The woman
Prime Minister of Pakistan did not think for a moment what Taliban
are likely to do with the fair sex once in power.

After army had driven the Russians out of Afghanistan, it found an
opportunity in Kashmir which was awash with political agitation
against the Indian occupation. Having learned the techniques
of 'Jihad' in Afghanistan, the army sought to leverage its virtual
veto power on these matters and privatized the Jihad. This was done
without giving any thought to the wellbeing of Pakistan and its
priorities.

The Afghan refugees had remained on the soil of Pakistan. Sectarian
and ethnic wars had erupted. A drug culture had taken its hold on the
youth of Pakistan. The economy never really recovered from
the 'reforms' of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and had been going down. These
concerns were cast aside for the rabid hate of India - revenge there
must be.

It seems, Afghanistan and Occupied Kashmir is that noose around
Pakistan which we have tightened ourselves. Instead of launching a
Jihad against poverty, oppression of the poor, cruelty against women
and minorities, ethnic and sectarian hatred, we have fought an
endless war against an external enemy without slaying the enemy
within. The young boys, who would have been turning this country into
a paradise, have instead opted for a hell on earth and a promise of
paradise by God - A promise He never made to people whose priorities
are upside down.

No doubt, an enemy like India cries out for revenge. But the ultimate
revenge would have been a developed Pakistan, a constant reminder to
the Brahman that we were right in ejecting from the united India. As
it seems, all we can do now is just take step back and reflect - it
is perhaps India, which hasn't finished its revenge from us.
 
What a history of wrong steps, ambitious families that think Pakistan is theirs to do with as they please and ultimately, a version of ISlam rooted in ignorance, as sad and as nonsensicial as it is, and it is, it's surreal, Pakistan as the once and future success story, Pakistan that won it's freedom primarily through a negotiated struggle now fights for it's survival from the legions of "real" muslims prepared to kill any Pakistani who will not bow down to them.


Textbooks of Pakistan now reflected a great 'Islamic' past which was only a part of the bigger picture. The innocent stories from the villages of
Pakistan which adorned the Urdu textbooks were replaced by either
half-truths of 'Sahaba', or tales of miracles by this Alim or that
Sufi. If it had been possible, Zia would have imported all the sand
in Saudi Arabia to make Pakistan look alike. Pakistan's own culture
rooted in the region disappeared from the pages of these books



Instead of launching a Jihad against poverty, oppression of the poor, cruelty against women and minorities, ethnic and sectarian hatred, we have fought an endless war against an external enemy without slaying the enemy
within. The young boys, who would have been turning this country into
a paradise, have instead opted for a hell on earth and a promise of
paradise by God - A promise He never made to people whose priorities
are upside down.

No doubt, an enemy like India cries out for revenge. But the ultimate
revenge would have been a developed Pakistan, a constant reminder to
the Brahman that we were right in ejecting from the united India. As
it seems, all we can do now is just take step back and reflect - it
is perhaps India, which hasn't finished its revenge from us.


Whatever one's take, it seems on cannot escape the surreal, the fantastical quality of what Pakistan has been through. And you thought Salman Rushdie's made of stuff was competition for the reality of our experience???

:pakistan:
 
Fruits of Revenge

No doubt, an enemy like India cries out for revenge. But the ultimate
revenge would have been a developed Pakistan, a constant reminder to
the Brahman that we were right in ejecting from the united India. As
it seems, all we can do now is just take step back and reflect - it
is perhaps India, which hasn't finished its revenge from us.

What a contradiction ... negative emotions like revenge or jealousy will never lead to development . societies develop and progress on positive emotions and hope ..

The writer is no better then Bhutto and Pakistani Army
 
What a contradiction ... negative emotions like revenge or jealousy will never lead to development . societies develop and progress on positive emotions and hope ..

The writer is no better then Bhutto and Pakistani Army

I don't think you understood what the writer was implying...

Nonetheless, add to your list of flawed leaders, Nehru and Indira Gandhi.
 
I don't think you understood what the writer was implying...

Nonetheless, add to your list of flawed leaders, Nehru and Indira Gandhi.

Dear agno

Nehru and Indira have not failed a nation ..
we are today because of nehru and his progressive thoughts .. he built a society on modern science . he established the best technological intitutes and PSU which created a great middle class .
and this middle class bought us where we are .. democratic and yet developing fast .
 
Dear agno

Nehru and Indira have not failed a nation ..
we are today because of nehru and his progressive thoughts .. he built a society on modern science . he established the best technological intitutes and PSU which created a great middle class .
and this middle class bought us where we are .. democratic and yet developing fast .

On the contrary, going by your own parameters of using 'revenge and jealousy' as 'negative' attributes, Nehru and Indira Gandhi qualify by virtue of their polcies and statements.

Bhutto had his selective achievements as well, most leaders do - it is the collective effect of their policies and their impact on the destiny of nations that is the measure for judging their value and achivements. And by that count Nehru and I gandhi both fail miserably, by virtue of having promoted policies of hate, conflict and hostility towards another nation.
 
On the contrary, going by your own parameters of using 'revenge and jealousy' as 'negative' attributes, Nehru and Indira Gandhi qualify by virtue of their polcies and statements.

Bhutto had his selective achievements as well, most leaders do - it is the collective effect of their policies and their impact on the destiny of nations that is the measure for judging their value and achivements. And by that count Nehru and I gandhi both fail miserably, by virtue of having promoted policies of hate, conflict and hostility towards another nation.

yes the result todays clearly shows the impact of past leadership .
and no Nehru never used negative empotions . can you please share any incident or link to verify your allegation ?
 
yes the result todays clearly shows the impact of past leadership .
and no Nehru never used negative empotions . can you please share any incident or link to verify your allegation ?

Nehru's polcies on rejecting the UNSC resolutions, the conditions of plebsicite on the IoA, his policies of refusing to transfer Pakistan's share of assets under the partition agreement etc.
 
Nehru's polcies on rejecting the UNSC resolutions, the conditions of plebsicite on the IoA, his policies of refusing to transfer Pakistan's share of assets under the partition agreement etc.

lol . I can only SMILE .
foreign policy was never a social obsession .Indian society was always open and no one forced his own agenda .
so the results are here to see .
 
lol . I can only SMILE .
foreign policy was never a social obsession .Indian society was always open and no one forced his own agenda .
so the results are here to see .

Why smile? The foreign policies of 'revenge, hate and jealousy' clearly satisfy your own arguments of 'negative' attributes, that you were using to criticize the author and Pakistani leadership in your first post on this thread.
 
Why smile? The foreign policies of 'revenge, hate and jealousy' clearly satisfy your own arguments of 'negative' attributes, that you were using to criticize the author and Pakistani leadership in your first post on this thread.

no it was not the Policies of Nehru and thats why unlike pakistan he never changed the Education curriculum to propagate hatred and revenge .
and while we in india grew on values of democracy and respect for others Pakistan is facing Bankruptcy .
India development is based on hope for better future and not on revenge .
I rest my case and let others see the result of it in present state of affairs in both the countries .
 
Dear agno

Nehru and Indira have not failed a nation ..
we are today because of nehru and his progressive thoughts .. he built a society on modern science . he established the best technological intitutes and PSU which created a great middle class .
and this middle class bought us where we are .. democratic and yet developing fast .

i have to agree with agno on this one. Nehru and Indira did fail the nation, BUT, not with a revenge minded mentality, rather a narrow minded approach.

Nehru was very tactless in dealing with China. It resulted in us losing a valuable ally who became the valuable ally of our arch rival.

Indira Gandhis economic policies prevented india from progressing in the 70s. her ideology of keeping india isolated was one of the reasons indian economic development was so low during the 70s.
 
i have to agree with agno on this one. Nehru and Indira did fail the nation, BUT, not with a revenge minded mentality, rather a narrow minded approach.

Nehru was very tactless in dealing with China. It resulted in us losing a valuable ally who became the valuable ally of our arch rival.

Indira Gandhis economic policies prevented india from progressing in the 70s. her ideology of keeping india isolated was one of the reasons indian economic development was so low during the 70s.

no one can deny the fact that Nehru lacks the cunningness required to deal in a international politics .. but here we are talking about building a society . these two are very diff things
Nehru continued the policy of respect and modern scientific education . his idea of socialism bought PSU . these PSU helped the middle class to develop the instinct and knoweldge needed for open market .

developing a society is diffrent from developing a nation .and no one can deny that Nehru made our social conciousness of modern thinking
 
no it was not the Policies of Nehru and thats why unlike pakistan he never changed the Education curriculum to propagate hatred and revenge .
and while we in india grew on values of democracy and respect for others Pakistan is facing Bankruptcy .
India development is based on hope for better future and not on revenge .
I rest my case and let others see the result of it in present state of affairs in both the countries .

I fail to see how you can argue that he and I Gandhi did not pursue policies of 'hate, revenge and jealousy' when I clearly outlined for some of his policies that did exactly that. Read deeper into what transpired before partition, and Nehru's thoughts on Pakistan and Jinnah, and it becomes abundantly clear what motivated him to do so.

Pakistan did not change the education curriculum, Zia, a dictator, did, to pander to his extremist views as the author indicates.

The present 'results', that you keep harping about, mean nothing. All nations go through dips and rises - judging the US during the period of the Great Depression would for example be an extremely flawed exercise, though you could come up with great arguments of how 'bankrupt and failed a nation' the US was.

Similarly, India's economy has hardly always been as strong or vibrant as it is today, with periods of extremely low growth, high inflation, food shortages and endemic poverty, and there is no guarantee that it will always be so either.

Pakistan has come a tremendous distance in fact - from a nation with a couple of sugar mills, to one with a whole range of industries from agriculture to hightech and a large middle class. Passing judgement on 'results' on the basis of a downturn, after eight years of high growth, really smacks of disingenuity and just a need to score points by bashing Pakistan.

Nations shoudl not be judged on their performance over one narrow time period, but their overall evolution in various spheres through history, and on that count the 'results' for Pakistan are extremely positive.
 
Back
Top Bottom