What's new

Fight for indigenous rights in Bangladesh continues

Loafer

BANNED
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
962
Reaction score
-48
Country
India
Location
India
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) was adopted on September 13, 2007 at the 61st session of the General Assembly in the UN headquarters, New York City, United States. The UNDRIP is a landmark accomplishment for the member-states of the UN recognising the rights of the world's indigenous population. The declaration addresses both individual and collective rights, cultural rights and identity, rights to education, health, employment, language and others. It outlaws discrimination against the indigenous peoples and promotes their full and effective participation in all matters that concern them. It also ensures their right to remain distinct and to pursue their own visions of economic, social and cultural development. The declaration explicitly encourages harmonious and cooperative relations between the states and indigenous peoples.

The historical subjugation and injustices faced by these peoples, systematic exploration of their lands, territories and resources, non-recognition of their distinct identities, traditions, cultures and customs, lack of political participation and engagement in decision-making, and denial of access to basic services were, among others, compounding factors that motivated the member-states to be engaged in the two-decade-long negotiation for framing the declaration.

During its adoption, the then Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon warmly welcomed the declaration, calling it “a triumph for indigenous peoples around the world.” He further noted that “this marks a historic moment when UN Member States and indigenous peoples reconciled with their painful histories and resolved to move forward together on the path of human rights, justice and development for all.”

As we step in the 10th year since the UNDRIP was adopted by the General Assembly, we must recognise that the declaration is the most comprehensive international agreement on the rights of indigenous peoples. The four countries (United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) that voted against the declaration have reversed their position, and now support the declaration. Bangladesh is one of the 11 countries that abstained and it has not changed its position yet. Nevertheless, at the domestic level, its top political leadership has promised several times to work together with the indigenous communities for the implementation of the UNDRIP.

It is estimated that there are approximately 370 million indigenous peoples in the world, belonging to 5,000 different groups spread over almost 90 countries. It is believed that 70 percent of the world's indigenous peoples live in Asia. According to Bangladesh Adivasi Forum, in Bangladesh, there are around three million indigenous people living both in the plains and the hills.

Over the years, the indigenous communities' struggle for their rights got the attention of the country's media and civil society organisations, and to some extent, support from mainstream political parties, mainly the Leftists. On the other hand, the government has also taken some positive steps for the betterment of the indigenous people (although it prefers to use the term “ethnic minority”), and recognised their rights through different plans and policy statements, including the Education Policy, the Tribal Health, Nutrition and Population Plan (THNPP), Small Ethnic Groups Cultural Institution Act 2010, National Women Development Policy 2011, Amendment of the CHT Land Disputes Resolution Commission Act of 2001, etc. It also took steps to establish CHT Complex in Dhaka, conduct language surveys, and introduce mother tongue-based pre-primary education in five indigenous languages. However, proper implementation of these steps and policies remains a challenge.

The 7th Five Year Plan (FY 2016-2020) rightly illustrates the existing status of the indigenous people by stating “The ethnic communities in Bangladesh are the most deprived of economic, social, cultural and political rights, mainly due to their ethnic status. Ethnic identities are creating barriers to ethnic minority people's inclusion in wider social networks” (Planning Commission 2015). Lack of proper recognition in the constitution, non-recognition of their traditional and customary land rights, denial of access to justice, lack of proper representation in the decision-making, etc., are also some of the problems facing these communities.

In recent years, members of the indigenous communities have faced widespread land alienation and different forms of violence and harassment. The recent arson attacks in Longadu, alleged extrajudicial killing of Romel Chakma, the forest department's declaration of part of Madhupur as reserve forest, Khasi people's land disputes in Sylhet's Nahar Punjee, and the case of Santal farmers of Sahebganj-Bagda Farm area are some vivid examples. These incidents show the vulnerability of the indigenous people.

The CHT Accord, signed in 1997, is considered one of the constructive measures taken by the government to address the socio-economic and political problems of CHT. However, despite repeated promises by successive governments, a full implementation of the accord has proven to be elusive. Major provisions of the accord, including land disputes resolution, withdrawal of temporary military camps, and devolution of power to the local bodies, are yet to be fulfilled.

In the 7th Five Year Plan, the government expressed its “strong commitment” to consider implementing UNDRIP and ratifying ILO Convention no. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples. Almost the same words were used in the 6th Five Year Plan. Unfortunately, no significant changes have been noticed on the ground. We want to believe that this time the government will come forward to make good on its promises.

Currently, Bangladesh is on its way to develop the National Action Plan for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Until now, the indigenous people haven't been consulted and engaged in this process, although a meaningful engagement in national development is one of the major components of the UNDRIP. Also, the spirit of the sustainable development agenda 2030 is “leave no one behind”.

So it's really important that the indigenous people of the country are engaged in the SDGs, their voices are heard, and their rights are respected, protected and fulfilled in spirit of the UNDRIP.

http://www.thedailystar.net/opinion...ndigenous-rights-bangladesh-continues-1445536

While these hypocrites ask for recognition of Genoicide Day.

@Nilgiri @gslv mk3
 
who are these people? and isn't it natural that the native people have right already why fighting for their right i means asia is not like north america where Europeans starts living asians native people are living in their own lands for thousands of years.
 
who are these people? and isn't it natural that the native people have right already why fighting for their right i means asia is not like north america where Europeans starts living asians native people are living in their own lands for thousands of years.
Indigenous is a misplaced term here.What they mean is actually are small tribal ethnicities which are not related to the mainstream population.Who have distinct culture, religion and custom often whose separate existence are threatened.This is a sweeping western terminology used to equate the condition of native people in a settler colony with those one here where both the small tribe and the dominant mainstream are both living for many thousands of years.It is like calling Kalash people in NWFP is indigenous while dominant Pashtun neighbors are not.But the realities are that both of them are indigenous in NWFP.
 
NO, the Bengalis weren't among the indigenous population in the Chottogram hills. Historically, the CHT had always been inhabited by a coterie of N-E tribes some prominent ones being Tripura, Chakma, Bom, Lushei and Marma.

In a cleverly, and if i may add, a dastardly hatched plan erstwhile Bangladeshi politicians decided to alter the demography of the region. That was when the entire chain of rights abuse and displacements started.

My Chakma and Lushei friends are today alienated from their ancestral homes. Many of them have shifted base to Tripura and Assam. Atrocities continue to this day in Bangladesh. A flourishing pocket of Theravada Buddhism is gradually being Islamised. The Bengalis are as much indigenous to the CHT as the Pakjabis are to GB.

Well of course, none of these would have happened had that arsehole Mountbatten didn't screw things up royally and handed over CHT to Bangladesh.
 
Most of these people are recent migrants dating back only some centuries. Tripura, Monipuri, Burmese, Rakhine, Chakma settled in these areas due to unrest in their own regions. They can ask for indigenous rights there. Where Bengalis are son of the soil for thousands of years. Uppercast Hindus are also migrant here dating back some more centuries than the Paharis.
 
those are ethnic grope in bangladesh they most get all the rights as all other bangladeshi citizen get. and bangladesh government recognized them as a ethnic group and they are free to do all there cultural practices . but they are not indigenous or native people of bangladesh so please dont confused by headline .
 
Indigenous is a misplaced term here.What they mean is actually are small tribal ethnicities which are not related to the mainstream population.Who have distinct culture, religion and custom often whose separate existence are threatened.This is a sweeping western terminology used to equate the condition of native people in a settler colony with those one here where both the small tribe and the dominant mainstream are both living for many thousands of years.It is like calling Kalash people in NWFP is indigenous while dominant Pashtun neighbors are not.But the realities are that both of them are indigenous in NWFP.

That's true. Other than the Garos & Santal people none of the tribes are exactly "indigenous" people. Then again a considerable portion of Garo & Santals were brought in to East Bengal by British colonial gov. & local feudals/Jamindars to clear forested lands to make agrarian lands & to increase the agriculture production,thus revenues for the British crown.


Well of course, none of these would have happened had that arsehole Mountbatten didn't screw things up royally and handed over CHT to Bangladesh.

CHT wasn't Mountbatten's to give or take away to begin with. CHT belonged to Bengal sovereignty long before the British colonists came to this land.

All of this said, Gov. shall ensure that all the culture & ethnicity can survive with their own identity. Afterall they are rightful citizens of this republic. But that don't necessarily have to infringe with the constitutional right of other citizens of the country. Everyone shall be treated equally under the constitution & law.
 
Last edited:
Tribal armed gangs looting trees in CHT
January 6, 2017 8:30 am by: engadmin Category: Breaking News, National, News Slider, Photo Gallery Leave a comment A+ / A-
72-01-03-01-2016.jpg


Reza Mahmud :

TThe tribal armed gangs are looting thousands of trees from the reserve forests in Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), leaving a very adverse impact on the environment. Besides, the terrorists have burned many hills to prepare those for Jhum cultivations. But the officials of forest department have expressed their helplessness in these regards.
“It is really hard to protect the reserve forests in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. We have sent the reports to the competent authorities for necessary action,” said Baghaighat Range Officer Syed Golam Shahid.

Some other officials on condition of not to be named said, “There is another government in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. The forest officials cannot inspect all areas of the reserve forests in the CHT areas. They seek consent from the tribal armed terrorist gangs to visit the forests. The terrorists are selling the trees of the reserve forest without any obstacle.”

According to the Forest Department, the reserve forests have 15, 66,935 acres of land of which 46,476 acres are in Baghaihat range, where no big trees were found when this correspondent visited the area recently. The 34 kilometres long Baghaihat to Sajek valley has now lots of illegal houses built by the tribal people.

Apart from these, the correspondent visited the areas of Guimara, Sajek, Kasalong, Baghaihat, Baghaichhari, Mohalchhari, Burighat and other areas of the CHT recently and found many hills free of green trees.

Experts say that the reserve forests of the CHT are being deforested day by day. It has damaged the natural beauty of the region, considered a potential tourist spot. As a result, the biodiversity of the area is at risk. It also hampers environment seriously. Besides, the peaceful people are losing natural resources.

The local people said that the armed terrorist groups of JSS, JSS (reformists) and UPDF are behind the forests lootings.

The armed terror groups are selling the trees and bamboos of the reserve forests, earning lots of money and buying arms. They have made the hill unstable.

The armed groups are sheltering their party men to build houses in the hilly lands. And to prepare the hills for houses, they are cutting huge trees. Now few hills beside the roads and bazaars are found with some trees, but other hills situated at a few distance from the roads are empty.

One of the officials of Baghaihat range said there are 10 to 12 forest employees there. They have no arms. But the miscreants who are looting the trees have modern firing arms.

“How we can stop the armed groups from cutting the trees while they have modern foreign weapons,” said one of the forest officials of the area.
He also said, if anyone tries to prevent tree looting, he will be either abducted or killed. So the forest officials working there enter into negotiations with the armed groups. They said many forest officials became victims of torture of the tribal terrorists.

Rabiul Islam, Range Officer of Shuvlong Range was kidnapped by the tribal terrorists in 2014. He was rescued after 17 to 18 days when the Army went into action. The Army stands guard against the terrorism in the hilly areas.

In these circumstances, the officials keep themselves away from showing any disparity to visit the reserve forests without getting permissions from the armed tribal groups.

Mantua Chakma, a resident of Kasalong area, said, many tribal people are now building houses in reserve forest areas near the roads. “We are now leaving the remote areas as the armed terrorist groups have made our lives hell by torturing in various ways.”

When contacted, Sayeed Tarikul Hassan, the Superintendent of Police of Rangamati Hill District said, “The police are always ready to catch any culprits in the area. If anyone informs us about the presence of the terrorist groups’ we shall take action.”

http://parbattanews.com/en/tribal-armed-gangs-looting-trees-in-cht/
 
Tribal terrorists opened fire upon the patrol troops of Bangladesh Army
March 6, 2015 9:30 am by: engadmin Category: Breaking News, News Slider, Photo Gallery, Rangamati Leave a comment A+ / A-
27461.jpg


Staff Reporter:
At Forman Tila, in Rangamati, hilly terrorists suddenly opened fire upon the troops patrol on Thursday at 3 pm. In response, the troops also opened fire on them and they fled to the deep forest of the region. After this incident, additional forces were stationed there and 3 team of troops’ patrol went on. Troops escorted the whole area and went on searching house to house.
Sources could not able to ascertain who fire on troops patrol. Armed groups of JSS and UPDF were on fighting each other on Wednesday at the same place. They opened fire over 5oo rounds. Russel Chakma(35), a JSS leader was killed at the fire while two other were bullet injured. The stray firing continued whole the day. The JSS armed terrorists left arms and ammunition at houses and several places at this time and fled away to the deepest forest. Both sides were engaged to prepare open fire once again from Thursdaymorning. They both tried to capture the area from morning.
Meanwhile an intelligence team went there for rescue the arms and ammunition. Seeing the men of certain disciplined forces, they again opened fire and troops also responded. Firing continued for a while and later on the terrorists fled to the jungle. There is none in list of causalities from armed forces. After search drive ends, it could be clear how much causality belong to the terrorist group.
Sources told parbattanews that the situation of that area is seemed to be normal but violence could be spread any time. Troops are searching after escorted the area. For making this region violence free, the troops announced they would operate a massive drive against the terrorists, the sources added

http://parbattanews.com/en/tribal-terrorists-opened-fire-upon-the-patrol-troops-of-bangladesh-army/
 
Bngldshis are adivasis so they are indigenous to the land.

Bngldshis are adivasis so they are indigenous to the land.
 
And theres jack you can do about it, must hurt.
I don't intend to do anything about it either, as it doesn't concern my well being.

But Mountbatten's hasty decision has indeed 'hurt' the tribal communities and i am privy to many such tales of blood and gore through the accounts narrated by persons known to me. They would rather have liked to remain a part of India's north-east.
 
That's true. Other than the Garos & Santal people none of the tribes are exactly "indigenous" people. Then again a considerable portion of Garo & Santals were brought in to East Bengal by British colonial gov. & local feudals/Jamindars to clear forested lands to make agrarian lands & to increase the agriculture production,thus revenues for the British crown.




CHT wasn't Mountbatten's to give or take away to begin with. CHT belonged to Bengal sovereignty long before the British colonists came to this land.

All of this said, Gov. shall ensure that all the culture & ethnicity can survive with their own identity. Afterall they are rightful citizens of this republic. But that don't necessarily have to infringe with the constitutional right of other citizens of the country. Everyone shall be treated equally under the constitution & law.
I will try to reply to your comment in two parts, i largely agree with what you said in your latter para.

CHT was never under the complete control of Mughals as it was impossible to administer faraway lands. That said, some degree of suzerain control was exercised and trade relations established.

During the period of British rule the Government of India act never applied to places like CHT, Nagaland and Manipur. British segregated lands according to the revenue and tax rules they imposed, and such rules never applied to these areas. They enjoyed a fair degree of autonomy.

So you see, CHT was never Bengal's like Nagaland hills were never Assam's.

But let's not dwell in the past, lot of water has flown under the bridge. CHT is yours to administer. But why are you hesitating to implement the award of the CHT peace accord even 20 years after the verdict. Why until this date full autonomy hasn't been granted to the oppresed tribals.

Take a leaf out of India's book, make note of how they have managed to safeguard tribal interests. Being a responsible democracy (unlike PAKISTAN), Bangladesh have to pass this litmus test.
 
I will try to reply to your comment in two parts, i largely agree with what you said in your latter para.

CHT was never under the complete control of Mughals as it was impossible to administer faraway lands. That said, some degree of suzerain control was exercised and trade relations established.

During the period of British rule the Government of India act never applied to places like CHT, Nagaland and Manipur. British segregated lands according to the revenue and tax rules they imposed, and such rules never applied to these areas. They enjoyed a fair degree of autonomy.

So you see, CHT was never Bengal's like Nagaland hills were never Assam's.

But let's not dwell in the past, lot of water has flown under the bridge. CHT is yours to administer. But why are you hesitating to implement the award of the CHT peace accord even 20 years after the verdict. Why until this date full autonomy hasn't been granted to the oppresed tribals.

Take a leaf out of India's book, make note of how they have managed to safeguard tribal interests. Being a responsible democracy (unlike PAKISTAN), Bangladesh have to pass this litmus test.

There is a little thing you are ignoring. In a Empire/Kingdom/State there can be two different revenue/administrative system. Many example are available in history. Even today's "One country, two system" are a good example.

A region can have a different revenue/adminstrative system & autonomy. But that doesn't mean it isn't outside of it's sovereignty or it's sovereign border. That region is just an autonomous entity within that empire/state's border.

In political Science the idea & dynamics of the idea of "Sovereignty" is very crucial. CHT wasn't sovereign, they were under Bengals sovereignty(just separately administered,like many other parts of India where,that's what matters.

And no it wasn't the Mughals who brought CHT under Bengal. It was part of Beangal since the Bengal Sultanate.


And India isn't a prime example when it comes to Tribal & Ethnic, cultural matters. No one in Asia or the world is for that matter. India would be a country where people of different ethnicities, culture & identity still heavily oppressed & persecuted. From Jharkhand, Chottisgarh to NE everywhere poor & tribial people are getting persecuted like rabid dogs. These people who aren't part of Indias mainstream Nationalism are still fighting to save their very existence.


And autonomy, separate administration doesn't ensure tribal peoples will have a better condition from what they have now. Everything is foolproof & pristine in theory, Reality is a very different matter altogether. It's not pristine & unhinged as Theory. CHT Accord won't solve anything, that's reality.

So no I won't take a leaf from anyones book.
 
Back
Top Bottom