jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
Prologue
Was watching a Danish TV series 1864 with my wife the other day, it was a nice series and all, it's about 2 brothers who both love the same woman and both got sucked in by the nationalist movement and went to a war against Prussia, for which they are destined to lose. The love story parts is moving but the war story part is just tragic.
That make me write the article today, from my own personal view on war. I have had asked about a millions times since I came back from Iraq and later back from Afghanistan. People want to know, how brutal and how crazy war is, I usually don't tell them nothing, IT's a period of time i just want to forget and move on, cause the universal truth is, if you were alive after the war, you must have done something you are not proud of to get out of there alive.
Regardless if that is a piece of regret you may or may not have, or things that you may or may not do. Everybody comes out of the war is wounded, either physically or on a higher planes. So, if war is that crazy, what is the most craziest things in war?
The Madness of War - Hope is your enemy
War are for the crazies, everything you do, everything you did, everything you will do, cause you survived, you must have done something really wrong. That may seems strange to you, but the first rules of war is you must accept that you are already dead for you to function, so you will not get drag down by this tiny piece of thing called "Hope" as if you have this hope, you will simply trying to survive, instead of going and fight.
So, if all goes to plan, you should be dead one way or another fighting a war. That is what you would expect, so there are no way out, no holding back, no remorse, you can then function as a true soldier.
So, you survived, by that rule, you should have done something really wrong. Did you duck into cover every chance you get? Or did you pretend to reload every time the enemy show themselves and fire at you? Or you just refuse to get into danger and let your buddy handle everything??
In War, hope is your enemy, the moment you started counting down the day you are going home, you start to put a bit of perspective in your agenda, maybe since I am short, I don't want to be that aggressive, or trying to avoid some risky move? Things is, everything in war is a risk, if you started to try and stay alive and don't take any risk, you may as well go home then.
So, is having hope a ad thing? Actually, no, it's only start to get bad when you have a perspective on it. So, if you ask me if hope is the madness of war? My answer would be no.
The Madness of War - Killing
So, we come down to the second item, killing people.
Well, this is a big step up, but if the true madness of war lies in the killing?? Let's see
In the civilization, regardless of where you live, i don't believe there is a place on this earth someone would tell you this is alright to kill. indeed Killing a person is probably the immoraliest thing a person can do to other, worse than lying, worse than rape, worse than almost everything that a person, any person can do.
But the fact is, you are using a civilization way to gauge the moral standing of killing. But in war, it never civil, you cannot use a standard where everything and everybody is going to be alright to judge the situation in war and call killing crazy.
If crazy is the word, then the opposite would be norm. And if we have to define norm, which translate to the things that keep constant in something. Then killing would be the norm for war, simply because killing/dying is the only constant in war.
You can say we did this and we did that, we build school, bridge, town, road, etc and etc. Problem is, everything we do is to draw a circle on killing, everyone have a part of it, from the person who serve you lunch to the person who do your laundry. Because it all leads back to you, the person who kill people.
In fact, killing is what make sense out of a war, you cannot see how territorial change in a war, the land wont change, only the government, so the only thing that make sense is killing, you judge your progress by how many enemy you killed, or how many people you lose, this is the sole gauge on your war progress, you can fight in the same piece of land over and over, your frontline did not change, but by killing the enemies, you are making progress.
In fact, it would be abnormal for a soldier not to kill. This is what you are expected to do, this is what you been train for, this is where all the money goes to you, you are a soldier, your job is to kill.
Mind you, the actual word "killing" is used in an extremely small sense, almost nobody will say that in war. You "wasted" your enemy, you "eliminated" the threat, your target have been "Taken out", but never a simply saying of you "killed" him. Killing is something we do, but if we have to put a word to the face, people may have a bad time readjusting to normal life, the one that killing, is abnormal.
The True Madness of war
So, if killing is a norm, then you probably be out of ideas on what is the madness of war.
The truth? If you ask me, i would have to say the true madness of war did not happen in the war, it didn't, it happened thousand of miles away, in an office, where everything have been decided. That, you are going to war, and you are killing people or being killed.
War usually started by a single man, or single entity, by a single desire. It's beyond imagination how a small portion of men behind closed door can decide the fate of thousands, if not, millions of people. People will say, yeah, you are a soldier, so what do you expect? You got send to war, and you got to live out of the ordinary, and into the whole madness of war, simply because a few thousand miles away, someone or something wanted something??
Soldier fought and died in war, never did they do it for themselves, there would be a motivation behind everyone on why they sign up for it, but the end would be the same. You fought for each other, you fight to survive. Whatever goal or objective behind the war is not even related to the individual soldier, be that land, money or oil, average soldier would not see any of it when the war is over, yet you are send to kill people and live through all that, not because of yourselves, but for a single desire from someone or something? Scary isn't it??
@levina
@Neptune
@AUSTERLITZ
@Horus
@Oscar
@Hakan
@DESERT FIGHTER
@WebMaster
apologise for anyone I missed
Was watching a Danish TV series 1864 with my wife the other day, it was a nice series and all, it's about 2 brothers who both love the same woman and both got sucked in by the nationalist movement and went to a war against Prussia, for which they are destined to lose. The love story parts is moving but the war story part is just tragic.
That make me write the article today, from my own personal view on war. I have had asked about a millions times since I came back from Iraq and later back from Afghanistan. People want to know, how brutal and how crazy war is, I usually don't tell them nothing, IT's a period of time i just want to forget and move on, cause the universal truth is, if you were alive after the war, you must have done something you are not proud of to get out of there alive.
Regardless if that is a piece of regret you may or may not have, or things that you may or may not do. Everybody comes out of the war is wounded, either physically or on a higher planes. So, if war is that crazy, what is the most craziest things in war?
The Madness of War - Hope is your enemy
War are for the crazies, everything you do, everything you did, everything you will do, cause you survived, you must have done something really wrong. That may seems strange to you, but the first rules of war is you must accept that you are already dead for you to function, so you will not get drag down by this tiny piece of thing called "Hope" as if you have this hope, you will simply trying to survive, instead of going and fight.
So, if all goes to plan, you should be dead one way or another fighting a war. That is what you would expect, so there are no way out, no holding back, no remorse, you can then function as a true soldier.
So, you survived, by that rule, you should have done something really wrong. Did you duck into cover every chance you get? Or did you pretend to reload every time the enemy show themselves and fire at you? Or you just refuse to get into danger and let your buddy handle everything??
In War, hope is your enemy, the moment you started counting down the day you are going home, you start to put a bit of perspective in your agenda, maybe since I am short, I don't want to be that aggressive, or trying to avoid some risky move? Things is, everything in war is a risk, if you started to try and stay alive and don't take any risk, you may as well go home then.
So, is having hope a ad thing? Actually, no, it's only start to get bad when you have a perspective on it. So, if you ask me if hope is the madness of war? My answer would be no.
The Madness of War - Killing
So, we come down to the second item, killing people.
Well, this is a big step up, but if the true madness of war lies in the killing?? Let's see
In the civilization, regardless of where you live, i don't believe there is a place on this earth someone would tell you this is alright to kill. indeed Killing a person is probably the immoraliest thing a person can do to other, worse than lying, worse than rape, worse than almost everything that a person, any person can do.
But the fact is, you are using a civilization way to gauge the moral standing of killing. But in war, it never civil, you cannot use a standard where everything and everybody is going to be alright to judge the situation in war and call killing crazy.
If crazy is the word, then the opposite would be norm. And if we have to define norm, which translate to the things that keep constant in something. Then killing would be the norm for war, simply because killing/dying is the only constant in war.
You can say we did this and we did that, we build school, bridge, town, road, etc and etc. Problem is, everything we do is to draw a circle on killing, everyone have a part of it, from the person who serve you lunch to the person who do your laundry. Because it all leads back to you, the person who kill people.
In fact, killing is what make sense out of a war, you cannot see how territorial change in a war, the land wont change, only the government, so the only thing that make sense is killing, you judge your progress by how many enemy you killed, or how many people you lose, this is the sole gauge on your war progress, you can fight in the same piece of land over and over, your frontline did not change, but by killing the enemies, you are making progress.
In fact, it would be abnormal for a soldier not to kill. This is what you are expected to do, this is what you been train for, this is where all the money goes to you, you are a soldier, your job is to kill.
Mind you, the actual word "killing" is used in an extremely small sense, almost nobody will say that in war. You "wasted" your enemy, you "eliminated" the threat, your target have been "Taken out", but never a simply saying of you "killed" him. Killing is something we do, but if we have to put a word to the face, people may have a bad time readjusting to normal life, the one that killing, is abnormal.
The True Madness of war
So, if killing is a norm, then you probably be out of ideas on what is the madness of war.
The truth? If you ask me, i would have to say the true madness of war did not happen in the war, it didn't, it happened thousand of miles away, in an office, where everything have been decided. That, you are going to war, and you are killing people or being killed.
War usually started by a single man, or single entity, by a single desire. It's beyond imagination how a small portion of men behind closed door can decide the fate of thousands, if not, millions of people. People will say, yeah, you are a soldier, so what do you expect? You got send to war, and you got to live out of the ordinary, and into the whole madness of war, simply because a few thousand miles away, someone or something wanted something??
Soldier fought and died in war, never did they do it for themselves, there would be a motivation behind everyone on why they sign up for it, but the end would be the same. You fought for each other, you fight to survive. Whatever goal or objective behind the war is not even related to the individual soldier, be that land, money or oil, average soldier would not see any of it when the war is over, yet you are send to kill people and live through all that, not because of yourselves, but for a single desire from someone or something? Scary isn't it??
@levina
@Neptune
@AUSTERLITZ
@Horus
@Oscar
@Hakan
@DESERT FIGHTER
@WebMaster
apologise for anyone I missed