What's new

Chinese warhead stockpile defensive: Hong Lei

Enemy

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
1,666
Reaction score
0
Beijing responds to speculation in SIPRI nuclear weapons report

Beijing hopes the outside world will not make wild guesses about China's limited nuclear capacity, and believes that countries with the largest nuclear arsenals should bear the primary responsibility for nuclear disarmament, Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told reporters at a daily news briefing on Monday.

He was speaking in response to a newly released report from a Sweden-based think tank, which stated that China has added 10 nuclear warheads to its stockpile, bringing its total to 250.

180373cf8432131723e10c.jpg


The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute released the report on Monday, saying China, India and Pakistan had increased their nuclear arsenals over the past year.

Pakistan has added about 10 warheads for a total of between 100 and 120, and India has increased its supply by about 10 for a total of 90 to 110, the institute said.

Observers said the report only demonstrates academic research and cannot be seen as an authorized source for judging a country's nuclear capability.

Hong said China's nuclear weapons are firmly committed to self-defense, and China has never used such weapons to threaten other countries.

"China has never deployed nuclear weapons in other countries, and China does not participate in any form of the nuclear arms race and has always kept its nuclear capabilities at the minimum level required for national security."

China's nuclear policy is one of the most transparent of all the nuclear powers, and the country has continuously supported and advocated the complete prohibition and thorough destruction of nuclear weapons, he added.

China consistently upholds that it will never be the first to use nuclear weapons under any circumstances, and unconditionally promises not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states or nuclear-weapon-free zones, he said.

According to the SIPRI report, only Russia and the United States have reduced their warheads. Russia cut its number from 10,000 to 8,500, and the number of nuclear warheads from the United States decreased from 8,000 to 7,700.

The number of warheads in France, the United Kingdom and Israel remained at the same level as the previous year, with 300 in France, 225 in the UK and 80 in Israel.

The institute acknowledged that the figures were to a large extent estimates due to different levels of transparency by the nuclear powers.

The figures in SIPRI's report cannot reflect the level of nuclear power of a country, because the sources for the study lack authority, said Li Qinggong, deputy secretary-general of the China Council for National Security Policy Studies.

He said just having a large number of nuclear warheads does not mean a high level of nuclear power, as it also depends on how modern the country's nuclear-related technologies are.

The report can be a reference for researchers, but the figures cannot be confirmed by the governments involved, said Zhai Dequan, deputy secretary-general of the China Arms Control and Disarmament Association.

Although the report showed that the global total of warheads was down, it did not mean a significantly diminished nuclear threat, Shannon Kile, SIPRI Senior Researcher, told AFP.

Warhead stockpile 'defensive'|Politics|chinadaily.com.cn
 
.
I saw some members claiming that China has more than 2000 nuke warheads. But now it appears that a country like France has more warheads than China. I believe the nuke experts can tell us more about stockpiling nuke warheads. I hope this forum has some experts who have some knowledge about this weapon.

When US can have such number of warheads, total more than 7,700, why can't China add such number of warheads to its stockpile? Don't they have the technology to mass produce nuke warheads and money to spend for the maintenance of such number?
 
.
Hong is a fool and talks complete ****..... Pakistan added 10 nukes is because of Chinese...they're the one behind the nuke race between India and Pakistan...... Chinese deployed missile capable of carrying nukes along Indian border...... Chinese threatening all the non-nuclear countries in scs over the lands.....shame on Frodo Hong....doesn't even know to lie
 
.
Hong is a fool and talks complete ****..... Pakistan added 10 nukes is because of Chinese...they're the one behind the nuke race between India and Pakistan...... Chinese deployed missile capable of carrying nukes along Indian border...... Chinese threatening all the non-nuclear countries in scs over the lands.....shame on Frodo Hong....doesn't even know to lie

Capable of carrying is different from already carrying, where did China threaten to nuke other countries?

Please give me any official or authentic source. I need urgently.

I don't think you are simply trolling.
 
.
where do people get such info? Since when is nukes not one of the most guarded secret of all nations involved?
 
.
where do people get such info? Since when is nukes not one of the most guarded secret of all nations involved?

Such intel come from years of painstaking research involving secret service agents who work as insiders.

SIPRI did not need to make a fairytale which any tom, dick, harry could do.

Do you believe CIA does not have secret service agents inside China?
 
.
I saw some members claiming that China has more than 2000 nuke warheads. But now it appears that a country like France has more warheads than China. I believe the nuke experts can tell us more about stockpiling nuke warheads. I hope this forum has some experts who have some knowledge about this weapon.

When US can have such number of warheads, total more than 7,700, why can't China add such number of warheads to its stockpile? Don't they have the technology to mass produce nuke warheads and money to spend for the maintenance of such number?

that is because usa and russia had nukes way back around WW2..also they were involved in the cold war,and hence they kept on adding nukes to their stockpile..

the country which became nuclear powers later didn't have to go through such a situation,neither did they have the money..

also taking the number of nukes to that level will bring about unnecessary sanctions,as usa and russia are already cutting their number of nukes,in order to make this world nuke free

google nuclear disarmament.
 
.
Capable of carrying is different from already carrying, where did China threaten to nuke other countries?
Please give me any official or authentic source. I need urgently.
I don't think you are simply trolling.

A missile capable to carry nuke can mount the nuke and carry anytime it wants right.......

Chinese not threaten to use nukes but a nuclear armed country threatening another country militarily then the msg is already delivered
 
.
A missile capable to carry nuke can mount the nuke and carry anytime it wants right.......

Chinese not threaten to use nukes but a nuclear armed country threatening another country militarily then the msg is already delivered

Today's almost all kinds of missiles are of dual use, conventional and nuclear. Does not mean deploying a conventional missile implies the mandatory mounting of nuke warhead.
 
.
that is because usa and russia had nukes way back around WW2..also they were involved in the cold war,and hence they kept on adding nukes to their stockpile..

the country which became nuclear powers later didn't have to go through such a situation,neither did they have the money..

also taking the number of nukes to that level will bring about unnecessary sanctions,as usa and russia are already cutting their number of nukes,in order to make this world nuke free

google nuclear disarmament.

That means even if you increase your arsenal, don't disclose it.

About US and Russia cutting down the number: only thing is that it does not matter if you take a bucket of water from the ocean. Even if they cut the number to more than half still they will be huge enough.
 
.
[Qbe beTE=Enemy;4366227]Today's almost all kinds of missiles are of dual use, conventional and nuclear. Does not mean deploying a conventional missile implies the mandatory mounting of nuke warhead.[/QUOTE]

Maybe, but still posses threat right.... Also which they deployed was the upgraded version from liquid fuel to solid fuel,... I guess the main purpose of the missile is meant for nuke strikes......
 
.
[Qbe beTE=Enemy;4366227]

Maybe, but still posses threat right.... Also which they deployed was the upgraded version from liquid fuel to solid fuel,... I guess the main purpose of the missile is meant for nuke strikes......

Give me a source.

And don't guess.
 
.
I'm on my mob man, so can't get you the link but you can check it out..... Missile's name us CSS-5 MRBM

Give me a source.
And don't guess.
I'm on my mob man, so can't get you the link but you can check it out..... Missile's name is CSS-5 MRBM
 
.
I'm on my mob man, so can't get you the link but you can check it out..... Missile's name us CSS-5 MRBM

I'm on my mob man, so can't get you the link but you can check it out..... Missile's name is CSS-5 MRBM

It is of dual use like I said.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom