What's new

Can a consensus candidate be found to challenge Egypt's Sisi?

EgyptianAmerican

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 15, 2016
Messages
1,829
Reaction score
5
Country
Egypt
Location
United States
RTX2CTZB-570.jpg

Former presidential candidate and leftist Hamdeen Sabahi is pictured during a protest against restrictions on the press, Cairo, Egypt, May 4, 2016. (photo by REUTERS/Staff)


CAIRO — Hamdeen Sabahi, a former presidential candidate, has called on political and partisan forces to establish what he called a “united national front” to select a candidate for presidential elections scheduled for May 2018. In a May 5 speech at a gathering to announce the launch of the Karma Movement — the unification of the Karma Party and the Egyptian Popular Current, which he founded — Sabahi said that the front must include national and partisan leaders and serve as a “revolution organizer.”

Sabahi severely criticized President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi's government at the meeting. “The time has come for change and for facing an incompetent and failed authority,” he said. “Sisi’s regime has become a threat to the Egyptian state. It is the worst aspect of the policies that the people revolted against in the Jan. 25, 2011, revolution.”

This is not the first time that Sabahi has advocated for consensus among civil society forces. In March 2016, he issued a statement calling on political forces to come together to create what he called “the alternative," to advance the principle of pluralism. Only a failed state “produces one party and one man,” he argued.

Sabahi ran in the 2012 presidential elections and won 5 million votes, coming in third behind Mohammed Morsi, the winner, and Ahmed Shafiq. In the 2014 presidential elections, however, he only garnered 3% of the total votes, with Sisi ultimately declared the winner.

Mohammed Bassiouni, general-secretary of the Karama Movement, told Al-Monitor that the idea to form a united national front emerged after six months of deliberations among the Civil Democratic Current — which includes the Socialist Popular Alliance Party, the Dustour Party, the Freedom Egypt Party, the Justice Party, and the Bread and Freedom Party — and added that discussion is ongoing with other parties to encourage them to join the front.

Bassiouni said that building a united front is an attempt to counter the current regime's efforts to “nationalize partisan work and monopolize the political scene.” The front also aims to provide an “alternative to the current policies.” It will not support a candidate in the upcoming presidential elections if there are no guarantees that the elections will be fair and transparent.

Asked about the move, Mustafa Kamel al-Sayyid, a professor of political science at the American University in Cairo, said it was a good idea, but its impact would be limited. He told Al-Monitor that political forces have little clout in Egypt due to the restrictions imposed by the current regime on political actors and freedom of political expression. Such pressures weaken the impact of initiatives like Bassiouni's on the public’s voting habits.

Essam Heggy, a space science researcher who served as scientific adviser to former interim President Adly Mansour in 2013, said that Sabahi's attempt to form a front in preparation for the 2018 elections falls within the framework of networking among “forces of change to correct the mistakes of the past.”

In August 2016, Heggy launched Presidential Team 2018, an initiative similarly focused on coordinating with political forces and supporting a candidate for elections with a program aimed at developing educational and cultural institutions, improving the economy, fighting poverty and unemployment, promoting women's status and roles, drafting a law on civil status, establishing religious equality and developing the health sector. The initiative adopted a four-month timetable for implementing its goals but did not specify mechanisms for achieving them.

Some believe the initiative's image and membership are being distorted by the media, some of which accuse it of trying to destabilize the country and charge that its goals are murky. Some media figures known to be close to the government have accused members of being paid to attack Egypt. Members also feel under threat of prosecution. One member has been arrested and accused of trying to overthrow the regime and misusing social media. The initiative considers any arrests preludes to the presidential election, as the regime moves to muzzle any opposition.

“The interference of some security services and their opposition to such initiatives,” Heggy told Al-Monitor, is the reason behind the failure of political forces' initiatives to build an effective consensus and present a joint presidential candidate. He sees the activities of the security services as spreading chaos and violence.

Sisi, who is of course expected to run in 2018, will likely present his presidential candidacy as a calling as he did in August 2016 at a press conference when he said, “If the will of the Egyptian people requires me to run for another term, I will do so.”

On Oct. 22, 2016, the Egyptian Center for Public Opinion Research announced that the percentage of Egyptians who approved of Sisi's performance was declining. That month, 28 months after taking office, his approval rating stood at 68%, down from around 82% in August and some 91% in July.

Heggy described the elections as a “historic” battle, should any candidate actually be able to compete with Sisi, and that he does not expect a decisive victory by Sisi, as in 2014. That said, he acknowledged, it all depends on two factors: that the elections be conducted fairly and transparently, and that Egyptians be conscientious about voting.

Presidential Team 2018 issued a statement May 13 in which it set its requirements before participating in the presidential elections. Chief among them is establishing a national election commission (to replace the judicial supreme committee that currently oversees elections), ending the state of emergency, releasing prisoners of conscience and expression, allowing candidates to hold party conventions without security permits, refraining from prosecuting members of electoral campaigns and holding transparent elections.

Heggy said he would consult with civil forces in the coming period in order to back one candidate. “I think it will either be Hisham Genina or Khaled Ali,” he said.

Genina was the former head of the government's Central Auditing Organization (CAA) until a decree by Sisi removed him from office in March 2016 after his organization uncovered corruption in state agencies. Genina had said in December 2015 that the corruption involved 600 billion Egyptian pounds (about $33 billion), based on the analysis conducted when he was head of the CAA.

Meanwhile, Ali's name began to be mentioned more frequently after he joined the legal team opposing ratification of the April 2016 agreement demarcating the maritime border between Egypt and Saudi Arabia and returning Tiran and Sanafir to Saudi sovereignty. He had run in the 2012 presidential elections, taking seventh place in the first round of voting.

Asked about his expectations for the elections, Sayyid remarked that Egypt's political climate today is different from that surrounding the 2012 and 2014 elections. He said that unlike the immediate post-revolutionary period, there is reluctance on the part of the public today to participate in political life because they do not expect any civilian candidate to be able to win.

http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/ori...ties-united-front-presidential-elections.html
 
Heggy described the elections as a “historic” battle, should any candidate actually be able to compete with Sisi, and that he does not expect a decisive victory by Sisi, as in 2014. That said, he acknowledged, it all depends on two factors: that the elections be conducted fairly and transparently, and that Egyptians be conscientious about voting.

That last line is what Sisi will make sure he crushes lol. He and his posse of elites (who were part of that $33B in corruption that was uncovered) have way too much power, control and influence. Never gonna happen, as much as we would love to see it. The elections will not be conducted fairly nor will a majority of Egyptians be conscientious about voting knowing that it won't matter, just like they did in 2012 and allowed the MB to influence a historic election that was brought about with a high price in civilian blood. Shame.

Asked about his expectations for the elections, Sayyid remarked that Egypt's political climate today is different from that surrounding the 2012 and 2014 elections. He said that unlike the immediate post-revolutionary period, there is reluctance on the part of the public today to participate in political life because they do not expect any civilian candidate to be able to win.

That's the other restraining factor. The candidates will be too weak and undesirable to unify a larger percentage of the Egyptians who would look up to them and want to vote for them.

Sisi is way too smart with his already-consolidated position as president and his newly and brilliantly cultivated relationship with Trump, and most importantly, his relationship with the influential elites of Egypt along with the modernization of the military in such a short time -- keeping the very powerful military's loyalty which as we know is most critical -- he's become even more powerful than he was before. His only weakness is in the pace of the economic rebuilding process and as big of an issue as that is, it's not enough to derail his position. No one will be able to exhibit a more influential image than him. This is the sad truth and we should brace ourselves and realize we will be seeing another 30+ years of autocracy, disguised under a shameless, falsely pretentious, democratic electoral process.

Aside from another revolution, term limits will be the only way to get him out and nothing remotely close to that exists and will never be implemented into law as long as he's in power. Even if anything resembling term limits is brought into Egyptian politics, they will ensure that another "Sisi-type" gets "elected".

On one hand we know and acknowledge that he literally saved Egypt from plummeting into a failed stated and we've felt obligated to reward him with some appreciation and loyalty. But the coup, in reality, was a crime, despite it's necessity even when it was followed by elections soon after. How can such a man ever relinquish this fruitful position of authority?
 
Aside from another revolution, term limits will be the only way to get him out and nothing remotely close to that exists and will never be implemented into law as long as he's in power. Even if anything resembling term limits is brought into Egyptian politics, they will ensure that another "Sisi-type" gets "elected".

According to the current constitution a President can only serve two terms of four years. To change that it would need a new amendment passing through Parliament and a subsequent referendum to go its way as well. By no means an easy feat.

A couple of months ago a Minister wanted to bring such an amendment (increase terms to six years) to Parliament. He failed to secure the necessary signatures for it even to get to debate. The President also publicly spoke out against it. I personally don't think Elsisi wants the job for life.

On the topic at hand, the opposition have done themselves exactly zero favours. They were fractured post 2011 and they still are now. No one has a coherent set of policies that they could point to. They're still attempting to sell a narrative that is bullshit while ignoring economic and political realities. They want to end "military rule" but once you ask them what happens after they go back to political slogans and sound bites.
 
According to the current constitution a President can only serve two terms of four years. To change that it would need a new amendment passing through Parliament and a subsequent referendum to go its way as well. By no means an easy feat.

Wait, what? There's a constitution? :D
I hope there's some power in that piece of paper that at the same time drastically empowers the head of state. The constitution needs to be protected by a reasonable and independent system that has its own checks and balances so that it has credibility, not by a parliament whose members are basically "indirectly" approved & can easily be influenced by the head of state. There's a slew of MP's that want to terminate the term limits clause. How can we take that thing seriously? Sorry for my skepticism, FM.

A couple of months ago a Minister wanted to bring such an amendment (increase terms to six years) to Parliament. He failed to secure the necessary signatures for it even to get to debate. The President also publicly spoke out against it.

I don't believe him. I think it's only a matter of time before an amendment gets passed and Sisi can run for term after term as he pleases. There's plenty of time to make it look like things are being done by the book and when they fail like that 6-year term amendment ratification, the next one will have a greater chance of passing. That's why I feel like it means nothing. I hope I'm wrong.

I personally don't think Elsisi wants the job for life.

I'm curious why you think so? To me, the things he says like "if the people want me to run for president, then I will" are nothing but "campaign" tactics.

On the topic at hand, the opposition have done themselves exactly zero favours. They were fractured post 2011 and they still are now. No one has a coherent set of policies that they could point to. They're still attempting to sell a narrative that is bullshit while ignoring economic and political realities. They want to end "military rule" but once you ask them what happens after they go back to political slogans and sound bites.

Very true. Ending that military's rule is a pipe dream. It's virtually impossible.
 
. There's a slew of MP's that want to terminate the term limits clause. How can we take that thing seriously? Sorry for my skepticism, FM.

It's a healthy way of viewing things. The Presidency hasn't had everything go its own way. Its gone toe to toe twice now with the Judiciary and come out on the losing side. First in regards to Tiran and Sanafir then in trying to influence internal judge appointees. It also looks like the Judiciary is also about to get involved in regards to the Emergency Laws.

The Constitutional Court is perhaps the most important check on both Parliament and the Presidency. In the event that something does get through Parliament though it will ultimately be up to Egyptians. If they chose to amend the term limits then they will reap what they sow. I like to think that after 2011 everyone knows they can't expect a job for life.

I'm curious why you think so? To me, the things he says like "if the people want me to run for president, then I will" are nothing but "campaign" tactics.

I don't think it is tenable both in terms of probable public pressure if it does happen and the ramifications of his current actions. This is currently a President that is at war with the nation's institutions. He knows that all of them are either weak or incompetent and publicly sidelines them in order to get things done without having to go through bureaucratic hell. This is why a lot of what actually happens is through committees headed by the Presidency and dictated downwards rather than being done organically by institutions themselves. It's also why the Armed Forces is being relied upon so much, of course he has to keep them on side but people often forget that its probably the only institution with half of its shit together. Of course this isn't popular in the Civil Service and eventually they will seek to undermine him if his reforms go too far.

Very true. Ending that military's rule is a pipe dream. It's virtually impossible.

I wouldn't say it is impossible. Bringing the military under civilian oversight (to a greater extent) and control is a must but what I have issues with is tactics. Many in the opposition are far too fixated with revolutionary change rather than working the system gradually. The collapse of the military would be disastrous not because it may cause some Syria type situation but because it will mess with current national strategy.
 
I like to think that after 2011 everyone knows they can't expect a job for life.

You are far too optimistic, if Egyptians are fine with their freedom of speech being taken away then I seriously doubt they would put up much resistance. Maybe after 30 years in office someone will smack some sense into the populace.
 
Back
Top Bottom