What's new

British-India in World War II?

ehsanm1

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Hello guys, I've been wondering for the past few days on British-India involvement in World War I and World War II since I really like those wars. Reading from Wikipedia, most of the battles against Axis by British-India were decisive victory. British-India also contributed the third largest military force to the Allies and heard about Azad Hind group was supported by fascist leaders like Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. Pictures/videos of them would be great!
 
.
Found some on Wikipedia:

220px-Operation_crusader_italian_surrender.jpg


An Italian soldier surrenders to an Indian Jawan during the successful allied campaign of Operation Crusader.
225px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-263-1580-05%2C_Atlantikwall%2C_Soldaten_der_Legion_%22Freies_Indien%22.jpg


Troops of the Indische Legion guarding the Atlantic Wall in France in March 1944.
 
.
Great Britain wasted a huge opportunity in India before WW I and II, that would have boosted the empire considerably. In 1939 India produced 1 million tons of steel, versus 1.2 million tons of Australia, although the population of India was 389 million and that of Australia 7 million and India had very inexpensive labor and huge reserves of iron ore. Britian didn't use the inexpensive labor to manufacture ships, tanks, etc, in large scale. The Indian navy had few and obsolete ships, weaker than the Australian navy. Although millions of Indians served in WW II, they were few pilots and no generals among them. Agricultural production was also very low in most of India, which had to rely on rice from Burma and southern India. GB saw India more like a place to dump its products and to get inexpensive opium, tea, indigo, etc, and a source of cannon fodder than a powerhouse and an invaluable asset it had to develop and defend at any cost.

In 1941, while Japan was preparing to invade most of the far east, Churchill sent over 500 hurricanes and a lot more equipment to Stalin, whom he had denounced publicly for decades as the worst tyrant. These planes, etc, were desperately needed in the far east. GB bought a few very inferior Brewster Buffaloes and sent them to Singapore, etc, Had all the planes that were sent to the Soviets been in Malaya-Singapore, Rangoon, Ceylon, etc, with the Buffaloes, The Japanese may have thought twice about attacking British territories and would have lost more planes if they attacked. The Prince of Wales and Repulse would have at least stood a chance to survive the attack by Japanese bombers from Indochina and support the British forces in Malaya-Singapore with their powerful artillery. There were no tanks at all in Malaya and little field artillery, Churchill had sent a lot of troops with light armament, hoping that they could somehow resist.
Churchill was shocked when these ships were lost and enraged when Singapore capitulated so soon (losing about 100,000 troops, mostly Indian, about 30,000 of which joined the Japanese). He seemed to have forgotten that it was his decision to send the planes to Stalin and that without planes the ships were doomed and without ships, tanks and planes the troops did not stand a chance against the Japanese army with tanks and the support of hundreds of planes and the artillery of dozens of ships.
Rangoon fell for the same reasons, blocking the flow of supplies to China and depriving India of rice (Burma was the largest rice exporter in the world) and providing rice and oil for the Japanese. For almost a year the Chinese army had to fight the Japanese without supplies.
It is ironic that the British would transport hundreds of thousands of Indian troops to the Mediterranean and would not supply enough airplanes to defend Rangoon, so that millions of Indians would starve to death. Although Roosevelt tasked Churchill with recapturing Burma so the Chinese could be supplied, Britian did very little in Burma for years, so the Americans had to waste enormous amounts of fuel, planes, aviators, etc, to fly supplies to China over the Himalayas.
 
.
Correction needed.... It is not "British India" It should be "British Occupied India" or "British controlled India".. The word British India sounds like they (brits) created India (which is not true... )
 
.
GB was very lucky that Japan attacked the US in 1941, forcing it into the war and greatly increasing the armament at GB's and the USSR's disposal. If instead of attacking Hawaii and the Philippines, Japan invaded Aden, Madagascar, Ceylon and the southern tips of Africa and India in 1941, they would have excluded GB from the Indian Ocean, effectively isolating and liberating India, Burma, east Africa, etc,
 
.
Correction needed.... It is not "British India" It should be "British Occupied India" or "British controlled India".. The word British India sounds like they (brits) created India (which is not true... )

British colonial India is another alternative.
 
. .
India was a key player during the World War.Several Indian states within the British Raj provided large donations to the Allies to combat the threat of Nazism and Facism. Indian troops fought the Axis in South East Asia, North Africa and European Continent.During World War II the Indian Army became the largest all-volunteer force in history, rising to over 2.5 million men in size.

Indian soldiers won the largest number of non-British Victoria Crosses during the Second World War for their bravery.

Another school of thought led by Indian Nationalist Subhas Chandra Bose of the Indian National Army (INA) allied itself with the Axix based on the principle that "An enemy's enemy is a friend". India's contribution to the allied victory was never fully recognised in spite of its massive contribution both in Men and Materials because India did not participated in the war as an independent country but as a British Colony.
 
.
Samjok,

Much of what you say is true. And it is probably true that the British did not want India to be able to build modern weapons.

Your military assessment, however, is flawed. World War II was not settled in southern Asia. It was decided by the fighting in the Soviet Union. Hitler lost the War when he failed to destroy the Soviet Red Army. America's great priority in the War was keeping Britain in the War. And after the Japanese brought America into the War, the top priority was to assist the Soviet Red Army abd its fight to the death with the Whermacht.

Even if the Japanese invaded and occupied India, it would not have affected the outcome of the War, only further stretching the thinly deployed units of the Japanese Army. And in the Pacific, the Americans could have have still conducted their Central Pacific campaign that carried them to the Home Islands. Conquering India would have had no benefit to Japan as they had no way of getting resources back to the Home Islands. The principal benefit was that it spared India the experience of Japanese occupation. And India benefited by the massive improvements in port and rail infrastructure made by the British and Americans.

Dennis
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom