What's new

Biden's new CIA chief William Burns on Kashmir: "The wishes of Kashmiris should be taken into account"

Aspen

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 18, 2019
Messages
3,585
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
India plays down Burns' comment on Kashmir
India sought to play down the comments by US under secretary of State William Burns that "wishes" of Kashmiris should be taken into account.

India on Friday sought to play down the comments by US under secretary of State William Burns that "wishes" of Kashmiris should be taken into account while resolving the Kashmir issue.

"The simple thing is I don't see a shift... I think, we have seen statements like this in the past and I am sure we will see them in the future," Foreign secretary Shivshankar Menon said here.

He was responding when asked whether India saw a shift in the US policy over Kashmir when Burns made the statement here on Thursday which was in tune with Pakistan and separatists of Kashmir.

 
. .
Diplomat Who Guided India-U.S. Nuclear Deal But Is Critical of Modi Named CIA Chief

fefc64d0-5451-11eb-b745-662faeb62c78


NEW YORK – U.S. President-elect Joe Biden Jan. 11 named William Burns, who guided the nuclear deal between India and the U.S. but is a strong critic of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, to be the director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
A former deputy secretary of state and a senior director for Near East and South Asian affairs at the National Security Council, and now the president of the think tank Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Burns emphasized the importance of relations with India while criticizing Modi over Kashmir and the Citizenship Amendment Act.
But he has also acknowledged that “outsiders” cannot resolve these issues.

“I continue to believe strongly in the wisdom of the strategic investment that America and India have made in each other’s success over the past two decades,” Burns wrote last year in an article in The Atlantic magazine.
Recalling his role in bringing about the landmark agreement, he wrote: “I was the diplomat charged with completing the US-India civil-nuclear dealing the summer and fall of 2008.”
The agreement reached while Manmohan Singh was the prime minister and George W. Bush the U.S. president, enables the two countries to cooperate on civilian nuclear projects and India to have broader access to nuclear technology and materials.
Burns recalled strong-arming European allies to go along with the exemption for India from the Nuclear Supplier Group to enable it to get access to nuclear material and equipment.
“This was about power, and we were exercising it – hardly endearing ourselves to groggy (European) partners, but impressing our Indian counterparts with the strength of America’s commitment to get this done,” he wrote.
As the U.S. grapples with the rise of China and its hostility to Washington’s treaty allies in Asia, Burns will have to balance his nation’s strategic priorities with his personal attitude towards Modi and India that he expressed as the head of a liberal think tank.
The announcement of the appointment by Biden’s transition office mentioned the threat from China.

It said, “Whether it’s cyber attacks emanating from Moscow, the challenge China poses, or the threat we face from terrorists and other non-state actors, he has the experience and skill to marshal efforts across government and around the world to ensure the CIA is positioned to protect the American people.”
Drawing on his experience of working with New Delhi, he wrote in what could be his roadmap for relations between New Delhi and Washington, emphasizing continuity saying that it was bigger than the ties between President Donald Trump and Modi.
“For India and the U.S. to maximize the return on their investments, we must take a long view, keeping in mind why this strategic bet was made in the first place: our common democratic values, a long-term vision of economic openness, and a growing confidence in each other’s reliability,” he wrote in the Atlantic article published last year around Trump’s visit to India.
He criticized both Trump and Modi saying, “As intolerance and division in both societies erode their democracies, I fear that the leaders may reinforce each other’s worst instincts.”
But Trump will be soon be gone, and Biden will take over with resets of international and domestic issues.
“A battle for the idea of India is under way, between the tolerant constitutional convictions of its founders and the harsher Hindu majoritarianism that has lurked beneath the surface,” Burns said.
It is “testing India’s democratic guardrails in much the same way that the Trump era is testing America’s” but “either struggle will not be settled by outsiders – but both will shape the nature of the Indian American partnership in the years ahead,” he wrote.
In criticizing Modi and the BJP, he listed the revocation of Article 370 of the Indian constitution that gave a special status to Kashmir, the CAA that he asserted “discriminates against Muslims seeking refuge in India,” feeding “tensions over disputed religious sites” and “pressures against critical journalists and academics.”
He wrote that Modi, like Trump, is “skilled in the business of political showmanship, with a keen eye for the vulnerabilities of established elites, and for the dark art of stoking nativist fires.”
Burns was also executive secretary of the State Department, special assistant to then Secretaries of State Warren Christopher and Madeleine Albright, and minister-counselor for political affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow.

 
.
India plays down Burns' comment on Kashmir
India sought to play down the comments by US under secretary of State William Burns that "wishes" of Kashmiris should be taken into account.

India on Friday sought to play down the comments by US under secretary of State William Burns that "wishes" of Kashmiris should be taken into account while resolving the Kashmir issue.

"The simple thing is I don't see a shift... I think, we have seen statements like this in the past and I am sure we will see them in the future," Foreign secretary Shivshankar Menon said here.

He was responding when asked whether India saw a shift in the US policy over Kashmir when Burns made the statement here on Thursday which was in tune with Pakistan and separatists of Kashmir.

Kaheen pe nigahen kahen pe nishana.

Dems are always not good for Pakistan cuz whatever Republicans do against Pakistan, they do it with flippant vitriol openly. But whatever the Democrats do, they do it shrouded in layers of deceit, lies and secrecy.
 
.
Kaheen pe nigahen kahen pe nishana.

Dems are always not good for Pakistan cuz whatever Republicans do against Pakistan, they do it with flippant vitriol openly. But whatever the Democrats do, they do it shrouded in layers of deceit, lies and secrecy.
This is Democrats habit in every issue, national or international.
 
. .
The US has more or less gotten Pakistan to lay off Kashmir, now they'll turn the heat up on India to get in line.

It's got nothing to do with Pakistan's moral argument (or lack thereof), Kashmiris or United Nations, but the fact that India isn't doing well at its new job of containing China.

Last year's clash has shown that India's focus on Kashmir is a harmful distraction. India may have thought that annexing it entirely was a good solution, but that opens it up to a lot of risk for internal conflict (which goes up if some factions try altering demographics).

So, in 3-4 years, I expect the US to force talks on Kashmir, and resolve it once and for all. It will spell the end of Pakistan's security establishment citing India as the biggest threat to Pakistan's integrity (if not in word, then in practice as God knows we can't afford it).

If anything, our establishment will likely shift its focus in removing India's influence in Afghanistan. I think the US may be OK with that provided it still results in a strong(er) Kabul, albeit one under Pakistan's influence (and by extension, US influence).

This also works in containing China. Without having to dedicate its own troops, the US can still say "no" to any Chinese (or Russian) activity in the west-half of South Asia that puts US interests at risk. It also sets up another bulwark against Iran (and arguably, the best once since it has nuclear weapons and capable military).

If Pakistan agrees to this, then I expect we'll see a floodgate of Western weapons once again.

@SQ8 @MilSpec
 
Last edited:
.
The US has more or less gotten Pakistan to lay off Kashmir, now they'll turn the heat up on India to get in line.

It's got nothing to do with Pakistan's moral argument (or lack thereof), Kashmiris or United Nations, but the fact that India isn't doing well at its new job of containing China.

Last year's clash has shown that India's focus on Kashmir is a harmful distraction. India may have thought that annexing it entirely was a good solution, but that opens it up to a lot of risk for internal conflict (which goes up if some factions try altering demographics).

So, in 3-4 years, I expect the US to force talks on Kashmir, and resolve it once and for all. It will spell the end of Pakistan's security establishment citing India as the biggest threat to Pakistan's integrity (if not in word, then in practice as God knows we can't afford it).

If anything, our establishment will likely shift its focus in removing India's influence in Afghanistan. I think the US may be OK with that provided it still results in a strong(er) Kabul, albeit one under Pakistan's influence (and by extension, US influence).

This also works in containing China. Without having to dedicate its own troops, the US can still say "no" to any Chinese (or Russian) activity in the west-half of South Asia that puts US interests at risk. It also sets up another bulwark against Iran (and arguably, the best once since it has nuclear weapons and capable military).

If Pakistan agrees to this, then I expect we'll see a floodgate of Western weapons once again.

@SQ8 @MilSpec

Yeah but none of this will go according to plan as usual. Modi and the BJP have radicalized a massive proportion of the Indian population and they have a take all mentality that will hinder any attempts to resolve the Kashmir issue. Also, it will be outside the scope of US influence to force a resolution, the US is no longer that powerful.

Biden will be up to his neck trying to keep the country together as he faces a rising domestic terrorism threat. When he eventually gives up his seat for Kamala, that terrorist threat will grow 10X as racist rednecks won't tolerate being ruled by a bossy and uppity Black woman.
 
.
The US has more or less gotten Pakistan to lay off Kashmir, now they'll turn the heat up on India to get in line.

It's got nothing to do with Pakistan's moral argument (or lack thereof), Kashmiris or United Nations, but the fact that India isn't doing well at its new job of containing China.

Last year's clash has shown that India's focus on Kashmir is a harmful distraction. India may have thought that annexing it entirely was a good solution, but that opens it up to a lot of risk for internal conflict (which goes up if some factions try altering demographics).

So, in 3-4 years, I expect the US to force talks on Kashmir, and resolve it once and for all. It will spell the end of Pakistan's security establishment citing India as the biggest threat to Pakistan's integrity (if not in word, then in practice as God knows we can't afford it).

If anything, our establishment will likely shift its focus in removing India's influence in Afghanistan. I think the US may be OK with that provided it still results in a strong(er) Kabul, albeit one under Pakistan's influence (and by extension, US influence).

This also works in containing China. Without having to dedicate its own troops, the US can still say "no" to any Chinese (or Russian) activity in the west-half of South Asia that puts US interests at risk. It also sets up another bulwark against Iran (and arguably, the best once since it has nuclear weapons and capable military).

If Pakistan agrees to this, then I expect we'll see a floodgate of Western weapons once again.

@SQ8 @MilSpec
They will open Arms flood gate to Pak and also Pak should ask for US trade and investment since we already have TIFA agreement no Aid like Kerry lugar or Military Aid we can buy US weapons easily if we increase trade volume with US very simple also remittance are increasing every day by legal channels.For india they bank on Trump heavily which was a mistake.
 
.
All hogwash. Intended to get some concessions from Pakistan on releasing some steam from CPEC.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom