What's new

Asia sees China as key to French diplomacy

Status
Not open for further replies.

MirBadshah

BANNED
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
523
Reaction score
0
Asia sees China as key to French diplomacy

http://www.dawn.com/2007/05/08/int13.htm

BEIJING: Incoming French president Nicolas Sarkozy is unlikely to revamp France’s tried-and-tested policy on Asia but may shift the emphasis from Japan to China, analysts said on Monday a day after his election.They said France recognised Asia’s growing importance, and that Sarkozy – once installed in the Elysee Palace – would have to pay increasing attention to the region.

An indication of his diplomatic priorities will emerge at the G8 summit of leading world economies in Germany next month, said Hidekazu Kawai, honorary professor of international politics at Tokyo’s Gakushuin University.

“A key to his Asian diplomacy will be China. His Chinese diplomacy will set the tone of his entire Asian diplomacy,” he said.

“Japan may lose the cosy ties with France it long enjoyed under Chirac, who is personally very much interested in Japan,” he added, referring to outgoing French President Jacques Chirac.

However, “a dramatic turnaround in France’s Asian diplomacy is unlikely,” Kawai said.

“As a key member of the European Union, France will continue to have a strong interest in the region. Asia, which is engaged in a large part of the world economy, cannot be ignored any more.”

As president, he will inherit good ties with China from Chirac, who made relations with Beijing a high priority.

Although the French presidential campaign was focused largely on domestic issues, giving analysts few clues about the candidates’ thinking on diplomacy, few doubt China will feature high on the diplomatic agenda.

Sarkozy will face tricky issues such as trade, human rights and a European Union arms embargo in place since the 1989 Tiananmen massacre which France has said it wants lifted.

“It makes sense for any country to pay attention to China,” agreed T.C.A Rangachary, a former Indian ambassador to France.

“France and China have many things in common, both are members of the UN Security Council, and trade is doing well,” he added.

“But that in no way diminishes French relations with India. I see the India-France relationship progressing very well. There is no reason to suggest a change in relations when it serves the interest of both countries.” Analysts do not feel the same about Franco-Japan ties however, pointing to past Sarkozy comments.

In 2004, he reportedly made disparaging remarks about sumo and the ancient Japanese capital of Kyoto, which Chirac often visited, asking how anyone could be fascinated “by these battles between fat guys with slicked-down ponytails?” and saying that “sumo wrestling is really not a sport for intellectuals.” While Japan downplayed Sarkozy’s remarks, many believe he will not pursue relations with Tokyo as actively as Chirac did.

“Japan cannot expect Sarkozy to be as pro-Japan as Chirac and the relationship will be somewhat businesslike,” said Chihaya Kokubo, a researcher at the Japan Institute of International Affairs.

The trilateral relationship between the European Union, Asia and the United States will not change, analysts said, with Paris unlikely to press for a strengthened European role in Asia as a counterbalance to Washington.

“I don’t think Sarkozy has any intentions of doing this,” said Rajendra K. Jain, a professor at the School of International Studies, at Jawaharlal Nehru University in India.

“The French do recognise that the US is a superpower in this uni-polar world.” Nor is Sarkozy likely to change French policy on Southeast Asia, according to Joergen Oerstroem Moeller, a former Danish ambassador to Singapore and a visiting research fellow at the Singapore-based Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

“Relations between France and Southeast Asia have been very good and I think it will continue to be so. I don’t think he will change France’s Asia policy,” he said.—AFP
 
hmm, interesting.

But Sarkozy intends to cozy up to America, which was one of his election agenda's. He cant denfintly cozy to China than what it is doing now if he plans to be with the US. The person's is only talking in view with chirac's personal interest with Japan, while Sarkozy doesnt have that.Do you think that is going to effect in a tremendous way.NO. Japan is as important as any country in the world to be pushed aside.;

Sarkozy is a good thing for India, US and Japan in my personal opinion. He is a right winger intended on French revival.
 
Well im just waiting to see if the EU or atleast France lift the arms embargo on China.
 
France cant lift the arms embargo against Chinese, they are bound by EU.
There is no shift of alliance over here. France of today is more inclined to United States of America. IF any one listened to Sarkozy, it is one of his election promises as well as a capitalisit agenda, which 53% people agreed to. People are talking about how Thatcher changed socialistic UK into what is today.The same is going to happen with Sarkozy.
 
It is all about business, a huge economy like China would finally shape up new alliances.
 
true, but Japan is no snail, And China threatens the world order as it is today, you can expect the leaders of that world will make sure they remain on the top. It will be grey world, where they will engage china as well as try to cripple it is influence. Sarkozy has made it clear that he will engage USA, He people elected him for that, US will not allow Arms embargo to be lifted on China.
 
hello, China threat theory! How's everything...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :bunny: :bunny:
 
Well, I love China means PEACE theory too, Every country is a threat to another country unless they have the same opinions on everything. India and China is on a collision course, so are the US.
 
engagement is not equal to marriage.

to be continued or changed? the consistent position of France in below issues: (find any divarication between France and China)

expanding cooperations with China
the eastward expansion of NATO
Turkey's application for EU membership
America's responsibilities on global warming problem
the use of force against the "unacceptable" nuclear program in Iran.

3 years ago we missed John Kerry but George Bush hasn't gotten anything worse with China.
1 month ago we missed Ségolène Royal but how worse will Nicolas Sarkozy get with China?

The Chinese are aware that China will take less benifit from France's global stratagem in the following years but its no big deal. while the French are aware that Chirac did not drop the rein because of pro-China stance, nor did Mitterrand.
 
Ofcourse its no Big Deal to China, They are more than capable of doing everything themselves. But it does make life become more difficult. The recent cozying up of US-japan and India, in various military excercises as well as political. The Japanese plans to change their constitution as well the purchase of 100 F-22's will have direct impact on china. India's global growth as well its arms build-up will have definite impact on china. The point is When countries grow their dominance overlap on to other powers who currently hold that power.
 
I think it's mainly due to the deep rooted nonconfidence between China and the US, I dont believe China intends to invade any other country.

excessive defence means attack. if this is what China has been seeking for, take a look at US of a then.
 
America on a military and political stand point is opposed to the fundamentals of China and what it stands for; its not about non-confidence. Americans just wont accept communism. Bussiness is another thing.
Taiwan, will be protected by US;
 
America on a military and political stand point is opposed to the fundamentals of China and what it stands for; its not about non-confidence. Americans just wont accept communism. Bussiness is another thing.
Taiwan, will be protected by US;

America is oppose to China not because of the said "conflict of belief", the so called "democracy and freedom". America have total disregard of democrasy themself. They disregarded the Palestinian free election which elected HAMAS by popular vote, and it is resolutely oppose to it. It only believes in its own interest, all those said "fundamentals" are made up political excuses to demonize and achieve its own political objective. America have strongly supported Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea ever since WWII, and these countries were run by corrupt and brutal dictators before 1990s : Taiwan - Chiang Kai-shek & his son, Singapore - Lee Kuan Yew, South Korea Syngman Rhee and Park Chung-hee; it is only after popular uprisings (South Korea - student uprisings prompted reforms, Taiwan - democratic reform after Chiang Ching-kuo died and pass the presidency to native born Lee Teng-hui, and Singapore is still largely a authoritarian state) that these countries have become democratic as seen today. The feverish support by America to these countries, were only to its own selfish defense interest.

In truth, America (and generally the west) is oppose to China because of its racist sinophobic view; even before Communist China was even an idea, it has enacted laws specifically to exclude Chinese - no other asians are excluded from immigration in the past in the same period - laws such as the Chinese Exclusion Act (USA 1882), the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923 (Canada), anti-Chinese zoning laws, New Zealand head tax (1881) and the White Australia policy were all specifically targeting against chinese.

It is this racist view that shapes many of its present politics. (And ofcourse, the support of Israel and its total disregard of Palestine)

China is currently beginning its way towards democrasy. It is currently experiencing what Taiwan, South korea, Singapore is going through back in 1970s - rapid economic expansion under strong dictatorship. It will soon enter the second stage, which is with wealth and material need fulfill, people would want to have political freedom similar to those countries of 1980s. It has recently enacted laws to safeguarding private properties, the most signinficant departure from its communist belief. So all these talks of "fundamentals" and "ideals" are really nothing but excuses of foreign country to exert pressure for its own selfish political objectives.


Ask yourself, if China is to suddenly become as democratic as India, do you seriously believe you will change your view about chinese? Which begs the question, what exactly is your view?? (In most forums, it seems to me that indians have this extremely racist view against chinese)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom