What's new

Americans and Briton win Nobel Prize in medicine for the discovery of Hepatitis C virus

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
Researchers Harvey Alter, Michael Houghton and Charles Rice have won the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine for the discovery of Hepatitis C virus, the committe announced on Monday.

The committee said their discoveries revealed the cause of the remaining cases of chronic hepatitis and made possible blood tests and new medicines that have saved millions of lives.


Alter and Rice were both born in the U.S. while Hougton was born in the U.K.

"For the first time in history, the Hepatitis C virus can now be cured," the committee said when they announced the decision. "The 2020 medicine laureates’ discoveries revealed the cause of the remaining cases of chronic hepatitis and made possible blood tests and new medicines that have saved millions of lives."

The prestigious award comes with a gold medal and prize money of 10 million Swedish kronor (over $1,118,000), courtesy of a bequest left 124 years ago by the prize's creator, Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel.

The Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine has been awarded 110 times to 219 Nobel laureates between 1901 and 2019.


Two Americans and a Briton won the medicine prize last year for their discoveries of how cells sense and adapt to oxygen availability.

This year, the medicine prize carries particular significance amid the coronavirus pandemic, which has highlighted the importance of medical research.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/...medicine-discovery-hepatitis-c-virus-n1242090
 
.
The Nobel Committee has awarded the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of the hepatitis C virus, one of the most common causes of liver cancer. The prize was given to Harvey Alter of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH); Michael Houghton of the University of Alberta, Edmonton; and Charles Rice of Rockefeller University.

The hepatitis C virus is transmitted via blood. Although many people quickly clear an infection, some develop chronic inflammation of the liver that quietly destroys the organ over years or decades, ultimately leading to cirrhosis and cancer. Patients often end up needing liver transplantation—or dying.

Half a century ago, doctors knew that recipients of blood transfusions were at higher risk of liver disease, and in 1967, Baruch Blumberg, also at NIH, discovered the hepatitis B virus, which won him one half of the 1976 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. But hepatitis B did not explain all of the cases of hepatitis seen in patients who had a blood transfusion. This year’s Nobel laureates did work over 3 decades to identify the hepatitis C virus, show it was responsible for most of the unexplained cases of hepatitis in blood transfusions, and make it possible to screen blood donations for the virus.


“There’s no doubt about the contributions these three have made,” says Jens Bukh, a virologist at the University of Copenhagen who has also done landmark studies on hepatitis C. “They are fantastic collaborators and also fantastic people. … They have had a profound impact on how this research field has developed, not only through their discoveries, but also in supporting other young scientists who have joined the field.”

In the 1970s, Alter and his colleagues studied hepatitis in transfusion recipients and showed that even though screens for the hepatitis B virus could reduce the number of cases, many remained. Hepatitis A, a virus transmitted via water or food, wasn’t the explanation either. In 1978, Alter showed that plasma from patients with unexplained hepatitis could cause disease when transferred to chimpanzees, indicating it was caused by an infectious agent. In additional experiments using chimpanzees—the only animals susceptible to hepatitis C—Alter and his colleagues showed the disease was likely caused by one or more viruses.

In the 1980s, Houghton, then working at the pharmaceutical company Chiron, and his colleagues searched for the possible culprit by sifting through collections of DNA snippets called complementary DNA (cDNA) collected from infected chimpanzees. However, most of the genes they identified in their initial screens belonged to the apes.


They then tried a different approach. They collected RNA (the genetic molecule that helps code for proteins) from the serum of infected chimps and used the RNA to make a new cDNA collection. They put that collection into bacteria that could produce the proteins encoded by the DNA snippets. Finally, they used serum from an infected patient—which they assumed would carry antibodies to the virus—to identify any bacterial colonies that might produce a viral protein. Out of 1 million bacterial colonies they screened, one coded for a protein from a virus. The researchers described their work in 1989 in a paper in Science in which they named the disease hepatitis C.

The researchers then developed a blood test and showed it could identify samples suspected of transmitting the unexplained cases of hepatitis. This allowed blood donations around the world to be screened, which dramatically reduced the number of newly infected people. Before these discoveries, “it was like Russian roulette to receive a blood transfusion,” says Nils-Göran Larsson, a member of the Nobel Committee. Transmission though the blood supply is now nearly eliminated, notes Ralf Bartenschlager, a virologist at the University of Heidelberg who shared the Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award with Rice and Michael Sofia in 2016 for work on hepatitis C. “They made blood transfusion safe,” he says. “That has prevented countless cases.”

But it was still unclear whether the virus alone was responsible for the disease or it needed an accomplice of some kind. Rice, then working at Washington University in St. Louis, tried but failed to infect chimpanzees with versions of the virus constructed in the lab. He suspected that, like many RNA viruses, the new virus mutated very quickly, leading to many clones that did not cause disease. He then worked out an “average” sequence less likely to contain disabling mutations. In a 1997 paper, also in Science, he showed that this engineered version of the virus—alone—could cause infection and liver disease in chimps.

Eventually, the trio’s discoveries also led to the development of antiviral treatments that can now cure about 95% of hepatitis C patients. Those therapies, along with blood screening, “saved millions of lives worldwide,” Nobel Committee member Gunilla Karlsson Hedestam said today. “The pioneering work of this year’s laureates is a landmark achievement in our ongoing battle against virus infections.”

At a press conference today, Alter said he is working to make sure every patient he has worked with over the years gets treatment; he says close to 90% of them already has. “Everyone has been cured. It has been so dramatic. I think one of the greatest thrills for me has been having identified the first patient [with likely hepatitis C] and now seeing not only that he was cured, but that everybody else I have followed over the years is being cured. I never could have imagined that, not in my lifetime.”

Yet about 71 million people worldwide are still suffering from a chronic infection and transmission continues, primarily in developing countries. The main transmission routes today are contaminated medical equipment, childbirth—when the mother is infected—and sharing contaminated drug injection needles. The World Health Organization estimates about 400,000 people died of hepatitis C in 2016, mostly from cirrhosis and cancer.

Egypt is one of the worst affected countries in the world, with up to 15% of people affected in some regions. The country’s epidemic started half a century ago, when needles were widely reused during a campaign to treat schistosomiasis, a snail-borne parasitic disease. Recently, Egypt has led the way in combatting the virus, treating millions of people with the new drugs and conducting a countrywide screening campaign to find undiagnosed cases.

Many scientists today expressed their hope that the Nobel Prize will help further reduce the disease’s toll. “The discovery and treatment of HCV [hepatitis C virus] is an incredible success story for fundamental science,” evolutionary biologist Oliver Pybus of University of Oxford tweeted. “Congratulations to the laureates and let’s hope this adds momentum to global HCV elimination efforts.”

Bukh hopes the prize will spur investment in a possible vaccine. Because hepatitis C causes few acute symptoms, it is very difficult to identify all those infected, he says. “Treatments are great, but they can’t control the virus in poor regions,” he says. “A vaccine is really needed to control this virus.”

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...hree-scientists-discoveries-hepatitis-c-virus
 
. .
This prize unjustly excludes Chinese researchers who were the key contributors to this discovery.

Houghton declined an earlier prize in protest due to the injustice of excluding them.


"Jason Sheltzer, a researcher and fellow at the Cold Spring Harbour Lab, New York, tweeted on October 5 that Houghton had been awarded the Gairdner Award in 2013 for the same work – but turned it down because two of his colleagues who helped discover the virus hadn’t been included. This prize is considered to be Canada’s “most prestigious international science prize”."

"According to one article on a website published by the University of Alberta, where Houghton teaches, Houghton had issued the following statement (truncated for length) that year:

“I am honoured to have been been named a recipient of the prestigious International Gairdner Award for my work on the hepatitis C virus. However, I felt that it would be unfair of me to accept this award without the inclusion of two colleagues, Dr. Qui-Lim Choo and Dr. George Kuo. The three of us worked closely together for almost seven years to discover this very elusive and challenging virus using a novel approach in the field of infectious disease.”"

"Qui-Lim Choo and George Kuo didn’t receive Lasker Awards either, nor have they been acknowledged in a press release published by the Nobel Assembly announcing this year’s medicine prize laureates. However, as Sheltzer pointed out, the first authors of two of the scientific papers that describe the laureates’ prize-winning work, in April 1989, are none other than Choo and Kuo (paper 1 and paper 2)."
 
.
This prize unjustly excludes Chinese researchers who were the key contributors to this discovery.

Houghton declined an earlier prize in protest due to the injustice of excluding them.


"Jason Sheltzer, a researcher and fellow at the Cold Spring Harbour Lab, New York, tweeted on October 5 that Houghton had been awarded the Gairdner Award in 2013 for the same work – but turned it down because two of his colleagues who helped discover the virus hadn’t been included. This prize is considered to be Canada’s “most prestigious international science prize”."

"According to one article on a website published by the University of Alberta, where Houghton teaches, Houghton had issued the following statement (truncated for length) that year:

“I am honoured to have been been named a recipient of the prestigious International Gairdner Award for my work on the hepatitis C virus. However, I felt that it would be unfair of me to accept this award without the inclusion of two colleagues, Dr. Qui-Lim Choo and Dr. George Kuo. The three of us worked closely together for almost seven years to discover this very elusive and challenging virus using a novel approach in the field of infectious disease.”"

"Qui-Lim Choo and George Kuo didn’t receive Lasker Awards either, nor have they been acknowledged in a press release published by the Nobel Assembly announcing this year’s medicine prize laureates. However, as Sheltzer pointed out, the first authors of two of the scientific papers that describe the laureates’ prize-winning work, in April 1989, are none other than Choo and Kuo (paper 1 and paper 2)."


Neither Choo or Kuo are from China. They are from Singapore and Taiwain respectively. The former earned his education in the UK and the latter in Taiwan and the US.
 
. .
and so they were excluded because...?

For the Nobel the maximum is 3 people. One from each team.


In the statutes of the Nobel Foundation it says: “A prize amount may be equally divided between two works, each of which is considered to merit a prize. If a work that is being rewarded has been produced by two or three persons, the prize shall be awarded to them jointly. In no case may a prize amount be divided between more than three persons.”
 
.
and so they were excluded because...?

They weren’t white. This is another case of Katasatk Shibasabur. TBH, people around the world put too much weight on these prize. They are very Eurocentric and minimized contribution other scientists around the world. It is a way for white supremacist to feel that all the world progress is due to white. This is like Chinese during the building transcontinental rail road. The chinese were sent to put explosive to make way for the rail road, contributed to the labor but at the end, they were left out of the picture.
Asian scientists in the West should understand the their contribution will mot be recognized
 
.
They weren’t white. This is another case of Katasatk Shibasabur. TBH, people around the world put too much weight on these prize. They are very Eurocentric and minimized contribution other scientists around the world. It is a way for white supremacist to feel that all the world progress is due to white. This is like Chinese during the building transcontinental rail road. The chinese were sent to put explosive to make way for the rail road, contributed to the labor but at the end, they were left out of the picture.
Asian scientists in the West should understand the their contribution will mot be recognized

Many institutions are racist - they automatically lend more credence to white voices. That's institutionalized racism. This is not an indictment of any individual - change the individual, the institution as a whole still makes biased decisions.

I am also well aware of this, so I limit my participation at work to do what is asked of me. I spend my mental energies elsewhere otherwise and am cool with whatever happens, happens.
 
.
And nobel prize of economy never give any award to PRC due to racism and xenophobia.

It is widely knowledge of PRC economy miracle of 40 years from poor third world country to major industries and middle class per capital of GDP which not heard in history before that.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom