What's new

Ahmadinejad said to be pushing for open atom work

PteX

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2011
Messages
2,919
Reaction score
0
The end to ambiguity? Iran's president wants to shed the nation's secrecy and forge ahead openly with developing nuclear weapons, but is opposed by the clerical leadership, which is worried about international reaction to such a move, an intelligence assessment hedged Friday.

That report, from what the Associated Press called "a nation with traditionally reliable intelligence from the region," could not be confirmed and it contrasts with assessments by other countries that view Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as relatively moderate on the nuclear issue compared to the country's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Attempts to interpret Iran's goals are important because as it expands uranium enrichment, it is moving closer to being able to make a nuclear weapon, even as it asserts that it is not interested in such arms and its programs are geared only to making reactor fuel.

A US official cited one assessment he has seen suggesting Ahmadinejad may be more "moderate" — more open to talks with the international community on resolving nuclear concerns than Khamenei.


Pushing for a bomb

But a blunt comment by Ahmadinejad last month raises questions. While repeating that Iran does not want nuclear arms, he openly reinforced its ability to make them, telling Iranian state TV that "if we want to make a bomb, we are not afraid of anybody."


That defiant statement fits the scenario outlined by the intelligence assessment shared with the AP, depicting Ahmadinejad as wanting to move publicly to develop a nuclear program.

Ahmadinejad is pushing "to shake free of the restraints Iran has imposed upon itself, and openly push forward to create a nuclear bomb," said the assessment, but Khamenei, whose word is final on nuclear and other issues, "wants to progress using secret channels, due to concern about a severe response from the West," the report said.

The varying views reflect the difficulties that intelligence agencies face when probing a secretive nation that plays its cards play cards close to vest.

Lines of division are murky, alliances shift and positions change, making analyzing Tehran's nuclear end game difficult. Analysts do agree, however, that recent political divisions between Ahmadinejad and Khamenei have spilled over to encompass Iran's nuclear activities to a greater degree than before.

Tensions in Tehran, concerns in the West

While much about Iran's nuclear program is opaque, the growing capacity — if not the intention — to make weapons is on the record, captured in International Atomic Energy Agency reports documenting the expansion of Iran's enrichment program from its clandestine beginnings more than a decade ago, to one that has produced enough material for more than two nuclear bombs.

More recently Iran has begun enriching to higher levels that would lessen the time needed to make weapons-grade material. And its stonewalling of an IAEA probe based on US and other intelligence of secret work on components of a nuclear weapons program is adding to concerns raised by Tehran's refusal to freeze enrichment despite UN sanctions.


Intelligence reports of tensions between Ahmadinejad and the ruling clerics coincide with other signs showing he is at odds with Khamenei.

An example of that can be seen in the fact that in recent months, Ahmadinejad apparently fired — and was forced by Khamenei to reinstate — his interior minister in what some analysts see as a rebuffed attempt by the president to eliminate rivals to candidates he would like to see in positions of power.

The move prompted an outburst of public criticism and led rivals in parliament to start proceedings that could in the most extreme case lead to impeachment.

At odds with the Ayatollah? (Archives: AP)

Reports of disagreement on nuclear issues predate that dispute, but some officials from member nations of the Vienna-based IAEA see tensions over the future of the nuclear program sharpening.

Proliferation expert David Albright of the Institute for Science and International Security said that the latest US intelligence assessment on the Islamic Republic seem to support the notion that Khamenei is worried about how the world would react to a nuclear-armed Iran.

"There is a lot of caution in the regime about the implication of building nuclear weapons," Albright said.

The Iranian leadership is "worried about starting a nuclear weapons race and worried about the international impact," he added, naming reactions from regional powers Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey as that of greatest concern to Tehran. Both Egypt and the Saudis have indicated that they would contemplate acquiring nuclear weapons if Iran had them.

One theory voiced by experts is that Iran might be looking to reach the level just short of making nuclear weapons — but able to do so quickly if it feels threatened. That would fit in with Khamenei's reported cautious stance.

In any case, Ahmadinejad seems to be further weakened by the dispute, and according to the intelligence assessment, that leaves the Revolutionary Guard as a beneficiary.

"Khamenei has decided to transfer engagement with the most sensitive parts of the nuclear program, including activity that can be used for nuclear weapons, from… the group of scientists at the Defense Ministry, who are identified with Ahmadinejad, to a special body in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp" the report ventures.

"This, due to the increasing lack of trust the Leader has in people in sensitive positions, who are identified with the President."

The summary interprets the apparent decision to give the guard greater say over nuclear issues as a boost to its quest "to establish its status as a leading power force in the regime."

Ahmadinejad said to be pushing for open atom work - Israel News, Ynetnews
 
Iran should make the bomb soon, if they already havent, with israel and usa having nuke around us, then its a must be priority for us.
 
iran is nailing itself by commenting so,sometimes bending does good job rather than standing straight..
 
'us' as in the persian people.
And so what i am in England? my friends and familly are in iran..

The Persians were slaughtered when the Islamic revolution happened, didn`t you know?
The Ayatollah made it clear that you are Muslims first and Persians last.
The Persian people attempted to overthrow the Ayatollah and Ahmadinejad twice in the last 2 years and failed.
 
The Persians were slaughtered when the Islamic revolution happened, didn`t you know?
The Ayatollah made it clear that you are Muslims first and Persians last.
The Persian people attempted to overthrow the Ayatollah and Ahmadinejad twice in the last 2 years and failed.

For one whats muslim got to do with persian? muslim is a religion and persian a race..
for you info no one in my family is a muslim and the only people that were religious in my family were zoroastrians.
and finally the ayatollas are bunch of arabs, persian has nothing to do with them. thier religion was forced on our country. they can suck my **** for all i care. why do jewish people always assume all modern day iranians are muslims?
 
For one whats muslim got to do with persian? muslim is a religion and persian a race..
for you info no one in my family is a muslim and the only people that were religious in my family were zoroastrians.
and finally the ayatollas are bunch of arabs, persian has nothing to do with them. thier religion was forced on our country. they can suck my **** for all i care. why do jewish people always assume all modern day iranians are muslims?

Well you support the so called Ayatollah Arabs because you want them to acquire Nuclear weapons to use against Israel.
Naturally i assumed you yourself were Muslim because Muslim extremists naturally want Israel to be destroyed.
If you are against those Ayatollahs then you should not be wanting a Nuclear weapon in their hands because then Iran would become a Nuclear wasteland...
 
Well you support the so called Ayatollah Arabs because you want them to acquire Nuclear weapons to use against Israel.
Naturally i assumed you yourself were Muslim because Muslim extremists naturally want Israel to be destroyed.
If you are against those Ayatollahs then you should not be wanting a Nuclear weapon in their hands because then Iran would become a Nuclear wasteland...
When did iran threaten to use a nuke agains israel anyway? i want iran to get a nuke not so they can use it against israel ( i am not a genocidal fool), i want them to have some sort of deterance agains usa.
Ayatollas are an enemy of my people. persians need their rightful place back in the world, we should hopefully return to the superpower we once were, without these mullas or their religion.

beside you should like the persian people as we saved you once from the babylonians, research cyrus the great.
we even rebuilt your temple.

I dont have anything against the jewish people, but i dont not like the zionist regime one bit, i have jewish friends even they hate your regime. the zionist dont portrait jewish people very well.
 
When did iran threaten to use a nuke agains israel anyway? i want iran to get a nuke not so they can use it against israel ( i am not a genocidal fool), i want them to have some sort of deterance agains usa.
Ayatollas are an enemy of my people. persians need their rightful place back in the world, we should hopefully return to the superpower we once were, without these mullas or their religion.

beside you should like the persian people as we saved you once from the babylonians, research cyrus the great.
we even rebuilt your temple.

I like Persian people, Israel has zero problems with Persians, we have problems with those that threaten to wipe out our country.
You should research the President that said that, though many say he was misinterpreted but we all know he meant it.
Iran will not be a superpower anytime soon, a regional power definitely but not a super power.
Persians were never Israel`s enemies, Ayatollahs that fund terrorist Arab groups are. Israel and Iran were great allies before the Islamic revolution, did you know that?
 

Back
Top Bottom