What's new

AFSPA must for Army to operate in Jammu and Kashmir: Parrikar

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
AFSPA must for Army to operate in Jammu and Kashmir: Parrikar
Giving example of Manipur, he said that AFSPA has been removed from some areas and the army is not operating there.

0000
Press Trust of IndiaNew Delhi,Publish Date: May 28 2015 6:38PM | Updated Date: May 28 2015 6:38PM
2015_5$largeimg228_May_2015_183850760.jpg
File Photo
The controversial Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) is mandatory if the Army has to be deployed in Jammu and Kashmir or any other state for internal security, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has said.

"Mine is not the Ministry to decide about it (AFSPA). It is very simple that if the Act is existing in that particular area, the Army can operate in that area. If it is not there, Army can't operate there," Parrikar said.

He was replying to a question about his Ministry's stand on Jammu and Kashmir government's demand to scrap the controversial AFSPA in the state.

However, the Defence Minister said the decision to lift AFSPA has to be taken by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

"Army's job is not internal security. Let me be very clear on that. It is not my job to maintain internal security but if I am given a task for internal security then there have to be appropriate powers.

Those powers come to me through AFSPA," Parrikar told PTI in an interview earlier this week.

Giving example of Manipur, he said that AFSPA has been removed from some areas and the army is not operating there.

Tripura government had yesterday decided to lift the AFSPA in the state. The controversial law has been in effect for the last 18 years to curb insurgency in the state.

Civil rights activists have called for repeal of the Act or possible amendments in Sections 4 and 7 of AFSPA, which accord far-reaching powers and legal safeguards to security forces while undertaking counter-terrorism operations.

Section 4 gives security personnel sweeping powers to search premises and make arrests without warrants, "use force, even to extent of causing death", destroy arms dumps, hideouts and to stop, search and seize any vehicle.

Asked if he was open to Jammu and Kashmir government's demand to replace the Army with paramilitary forces, Parrikar said, "I don't want to comment on anything that comes under somebody else's domain or Home Ministry's decision making process. They have to analyse the situation and take a decision".

He added that the MHA has to take a call on where all the Army has to be deployed for internal security.

"MHA has to take a call and tell us whether we operate or not. If they think that we are not required, then they can do whatever they want to do. But if that Act is not there, I will not be able to operate," he said.

The Army continues to be against any move to dilute the AFSPA in Jammu and Kashmir.

The Army feels that if AFSPA, which it terms as an "enabling Act", is partially withdrawn or diluted, there are chances that radicalisation and even violence level are likely to increase.

Talking about infiltration attempts at the Line of Control, the Defence Minister said it was too early to say whether there has been an increase because winter has been late this year and snow has just melted.

However, he said there have always been efforts from the "other side" to push in infiltrators.

"Firing that takes place to keep you engaged away from the border so that you don't stop infiltration and at times to stop you from constructing bunkers," he said.


AFSPA must for Army to operate in Jammu and Kashmir: Parrikar
 
Agreed. IA can't operate in such hostile conditions if its hands are tied
 
Obviously till the time Pakistanis beat chest about Kashmir and sponsor terrorism there will be AFPSA . In a way Pakistan is causing more miseries to kashmiris than India can .
 
AFSPA must for Army to operate in Jammu and Kashmir: Parrikar
Giving example of Manipur, he said that AFSPA has been removed from some areas and the army is not operating there.

0000
Press Trust of IndiaNew Delhi,Publish Date: May 28 2015 6:38PM | Updated Date: May 28 2015 6:38PM
2015_5$largeimg228_May_2015_183850760.jpg
File Photo
The controversial Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) is mandatory if the Army has to be deployed in Jammu and Kashmir or any other state for internal security, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has said.

"Mine is not the Ministry to decide about it (AFSPA). It is very simple that if the Act is existing in that particular area, the Army can operate in that area. If it is not there, Army can't operate there," Parrikar said.

He was replying to a question about his Ministry's stand on Jammu and Kashmir government's demand to scrap the controversial AFSPA in the state.

However, the Defence Minister said the decision to lift AFSPA has to be taken by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

"Army's job is not internal security. Let me be very clear on that. It is not my job to maintain internal security but if I am given a task for internal security then there have to be appropriate powers.

Those powers come to me through AFSPA," Parrikar told PTI in an interview earlier this week.

Giving example of Manipur, he said that AFSPA has been removed from some areas and the army is not operating there.

Tripura government had yesterday decided to lift the AFSPA in the state. The controversial law has been in effect for the last 18 years to curb insurgency in the state.

Civil rights activists have called for repeal of the Act or possible amendments in Sections 4 and 7 of AFSPA, which accord far-reaching powers and legal safeguards to security forces while undertaking counter-terrorism operations.

Section 4 gives security personnel sweeping powers to search premises and make arrests without warrants, "use force, even to extent of causing death", destroy arms dumps, hideouts and to stop, search and seize any vehicle.

Asked if he was open to Jammu and Kashmir government's demand to replace the Army with paramilitary forces, Parrikar said, "I don't want to comment on anything that comes under somebody else's domain or Home Ministry's decision making process. They have to analyse the situation and take a decision".

He added that the MHA has to take a call on where all the Army has to be deployed for internal security.

"MHA has to take a call and tell us whether we operate or not. If they think that we are not required, then they can do whatever they want to do. But if that Act is not there, I will not be able to operate," he said.

The Army continues to be against any move to dilute the AFSPA in Jammu and Kashmir.

The Army feels that if AFSPA, which it terms as an "enabling Act", is partially withdrawn or diluted, there are chances that radicalisation and even violence level are likely to increase.

Talking about infiltration attempts at the Line of Control, the Defence Minister said it was too early to say whether there has been an increase because winter has been late this year and snow has just melted.

However, he said there have always been efforts from the "other side" to push in infiltrators.

"Firing that takes place to keep you engaged away from the border so that you don't stop infiltration and at times to stop you from constructing bunkers," he said.


AFSPA must for Army to operate in Jammu and Kashmir: Parrikar
It's true. At a time when foreign fighters are still being pushed into Indian territory the umbrella under which the IA/CAPFs operate can not be withdrawn, to do so would greatly damage India in the long run as the security forces would be operating with their hands tied behind their backs. Every military/security force needs legal protection to operate in such COIN environments. Just look at the US, they had similar cover in Iraq, the moment the Iraqi government refused to extend such protection to the soldiers the US withdrew its forces.

Also, the IA/MoD needs to do a better job of conveying a more accurate picture of how the COIN ops are carried out. The narrative far too many in the Media parrot is that AFSPA equals full impunity and a lack of any accountability when in reality it simply means the IA/CAPFs are beyond the jurisdiction of civilian courts but that doesn't mean there is no accountability. The IA and CAPFs deal with instances of extra-judaical actions by its members internally and those found to be in the wrong are court-martialled, jailed, lose their pensions, ranks and benefits and are dealt with far more swiftly than any civilian court would be able to deliver.

Obviously till the time Pakistanis beat chest about Kashmir and sponsor terrorism there will be AFPSA . In a way Pakistan is causing more miseries to kashmiris than India can .
And you think they care? This is their objective and sadly India keeps falling into their trap.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom