Search results

Why India is always trying to consider China as an enemy instead of a friend? Is it just because there was a regional war 50 years ago?

South Korea can't live without China. The economy ties them together.

This carrier is too small for China to own. Upgrading this is just a waste of money. What China needs is something bigger than Varyag. Obviously no country other than Russia and US is able to sell that to China.

Tibet has a long history, so is their history within the Chinese history. Are you a Tibetan? Since when are you entitled to ask me to read more books? Furthermore, even if you read every single book in the world you can't change the fact that Tibet is part of China so basically you are wasting...

I highly doubt that. Today even British new carrier is going to be assembled by Chinese cranes, what is the point for Chinese to buy an old British carrier?

I wonder if anyone is interested in discussing Hawaii and Texas's history before they were absorbed into the US. Same can be seen in Vietnam as well, many minorities in the northern Vietnam want their independence, so how is Vietnam government is going to deal with this? Discussing these kind of...

I wouldn't play that. There should be more Chinese commercial games like that so they can compete with the American counterparts. But sadly they are always a few steps behind the US.

I agree. It has far more political articles than articles regarding economics. Every solution, in the end, has to come out from the UK or the US. I only read it to improve my English.

Have you been to Australia? In 2008 a 41 years old Chinese immigrant who was a lecturer in Victoria University in Melbourne was beaten to death by a few teenagers. These guys originally thought of going out "curry bashing" (which meant assaulting and robbing an Indian) when they dined in...

I myself am the victim of this non-sense. The fact is when people talk about immigrants they tend to think of the refugees as the image of immigrants.

In the sentence he mentioned dual citizenship which means he admitted that the Chinese he was talking about was an Australian but in fact it is impossible to keep dual citizenship for a Chinese.

He said a Chinese with an Australian citizenship is not an Australian and you said it is not racist at all? Then what is racist then?

You are right. I am also considering this if situation doesn't turn out too well. I think the Australian public welcomes multiculturalism but maybe there is something hiding behind that we cannot see clearly.

I'll just quote one but I am not going to quote all because there are too many of them: This guy doesn't even know the fact that China doesn't allow dual citizenship. If Chinese acquire Australian citizenship they will automatically lose their Chinese citizenship.

Didn't you really see any racism comments there? I would have nothing to say if you think there is no biased comments there. At the bottom of the article?