Search results

Heh, to be honest I'm one of those who think J-10C isn't truly nessesary for PAF. I didn't claim anything, since I wasn't active here at the time. My thought was, is having an aircraft with the capabilty of, at most, one and a half JF-17BLK3, worth all the trouble of inducting something entirely...

Oh my my my my. Last time I was here(2017 I think), MastanKhan was a pretty normal and respected poster. Other than his habit to start every reply with "Hi" and his obsession with JH-7A of course. What has happened in the last 5 years? If I remember correctly, that was started by an insane...

TVC was installed on a single J-10B as a prototype/proof of concept, all J-10C in service does not use TVC nozzles.

I don't know why so many of you like the JH-7 so much. It is an outdated aircraft, which the PLA is phasing out and replacing with J-16. There are NO on-going projects to upgrade radar, engines, avionics or anything else. PLA is using JH-7 as a stand-off missile platform, a modified 1950s...

Good. Now let's get US on board to form the dream team and we will be ready to fight the aliens.

It appears you replied to me while I was editing my previous reply to you. I added that China is doing a poorman's flexing that achieves more or less the same effect: Maintain military presence. Not to the same extent of course, but I don't think the extent matter in the South China Sea case...

This is the first time I saw arguments like "Tejas is less tiring" and "IFR probe is useless because the pilot is too tired". Normally I don't reply to ridiculous arguments like these, but the shock value from your post alone is worth replying to. Alright, what's first. Literally all the...

I did not honor my declaration. Well, good thing nobody ever cared.

Not saying you can't. Just saying all the money that went into useless flexing could've gone to some places that are more useful. More flexing = less everything else Just logic, unless you are planning on expanding military budget just to allow more flexing, in that case, more flexing =...

US: *flex* China: Nice! US: *flex* China: Good! US: *flex* China: Awesome! And while US is pouring money into flexing, China is using its budget for R&D and building ships. Keep flexing pal.

Funny how the author choose to add "Chinese" before JF-17 without adding "French" to Mirage 2000. As if that would nullify Pakistan's contribution to the program. And here goes another typical Tejas vs Thunder thread. Tejas Supporters repeating the same old arguments over and over again...

DDG-112? Come on it's just a type 052, not even a 052B. Even that 054A looked flashier. Hope we can send Type 055 and 052Ds for AMAN-19.

That's odd. Normally only interception gets that close. But the Chinese aircraft is a AWACS, strange indeed.

This is an interesting time because the second industrial revolution, maybe the 1.5th, is on the verge of happening. Pakistan may start now for a head start, or wait for technology to revolutionize manufacturing and take advantage of starting late while other countries (like China) would have...

Saw that in Oedosoldier's twitter too. Most likely a photoshop or the CG contractor making a joke? Since it's makes no sense, the Chinese text surrounding the CG has nothing to do with military use(it's about the application of 3D printing in aerospace industries), the C919 is in civilian...

The original post(from CJDBY) had the title "A new bird from SAC is in the air", and inside the post he said he took the pictures near SAC and nothing more. The replies to that post are mostly people suggesting it's either a J-11 or J-16. So the most likely case is it's a "newly manufactured"...

Good. I frequently talk about dildos and send picture of owls on Whatsapp. NSA must be in for a surprise.

This is simply media twisting words from a Chinese author. No official sources confirmed this, even the original article only suggested this. Also, I wholeheartedly believe that Pakistan's aerospace technology is more than enough to develop an ICBM on her own without any outside help. There is...

This is more like it. But it's still from a person quoting Pupu saying "J-10D would be used against F-35". But this rumor is pretty widespread across CJDBY, I'd take that people have actually checked pupu's weibo. But "J-10D = silent J-10" is still just a logical thought from "J-10D will be used...

"Learn some Chinese" is just a lazy answer, and a irresponsible answer in this case. As the image you posted only implies "we will see J-10D soon" and nothing else. If you don't want to bother translating, at least post the source so some other people can do it.