Search results

i am with u on that 1. It is sad that some in my country reject the need for devolution. It is lack of knowlegde on devolution and fear created by demogauge like politicians especially Wimal weerawansa (i wonder wthr u know, he is an idiot). Otherwise there is no harm in devolution.

Of course SL being stable and posperous is good for the region and india as well. But what is happening clearly is bullying of SL by claiming false allgations. In today's worls when a lie is repeated thousand of times, it becomes truth. u have an amazing ability to read what is not...

13th amend does not have a federal set up. It is true idiotic extremist sinhala politicians reject it but MR would bring it if he wants to. Just like many in SL i too hope SL gov would bring proper power devolution and solve this. Many have questn gov's inability to bring a devolution package...

Isnt war about who slaughter first? if u are a member of a defence forum you would realize that. If u want to add every part responsible for the bloody war, im afraid even indian gov would be a part of it. Had not for india SL war would have been less bloody. It is difficult to reduce casualty...

SL never did indiscriminate bombarding. SL is not a rich country to waste bombs on civilians. It was the LTTE the army targeted. The LTTE went inside civilian populations and fired at the army thus making the SLA fire back. LTTE is mostly responsible for the civilian deaths.

30000 deaths is a bogus claim by many media. If u track how the figure of 30000 came into being you can understand that. a UN official published a book saying 3000-30000 died in SL war. Just see the range it is doubtful wthr this is a true figure. Then Tamilnet got the upper limit value from it...

There was never a genocide in SL