If you want to say insurgency is not part of the war, then there was never a second war in Iraq. Most of Iraqi forces surrendered as US forces got there...they weren't trying to fight, they were waiting for US forces to "liberate" them. The ones that stayed and fought are what the US are now...
Good point. But what Kaiser has in mind is that AK is an indigenous design based off of Type 90 II while in actuality AK is a Type 90 II with minor modifications to fit Pakistan's purpose.
AK's turret and Leclerc's turret are completely different designs. If you want Leclerc's 120mm autoloader in AK's turret, you have to do some major modifications to both AK's turret and Leclerc's autoloader; these kind of modifications that would completely change AK's turret.
Thermals isn't...
The report says China is s potential threat, not a threat yet. Many nations still think PLA is an overly large obsolete military, however, that is not the case today. US beat Iraq couple times and look what its status is now. Taiwan's military is a lot more advanced than Iraq. A PLA victory...
Iraq would never win the air and sea campaign against US, but Iraq's Army could have done some major damages on the ground. Winning is a whole different story if US makes up its mind about something.
AK uses a 125 mm gun while Leclerc uses a 120 mm gun. 120 mm autoloader doesn't work with a 125 mm gun, ammunition won't match.
Might be the only difference if you can show me your sources.
Type 90IIM version uses the exact same version.
How about some basic details about this advanced...
First of all, Type 99's electronics is classified, there is no fact to compare with. Second of all, JDW tells the truth half the time.
Type 99's is rated at 1000mm w/ERA which is BETTER than AK's 800mm...1000mm>800mm lol.
I just read the article now and found the pakistan forum article is wrong...but sinodefence's is correct, it was debated on their forums and by CDF for years.
Actually, Type 90 II is joint developed by China and Pakistan...except that China didn't want it. AK and Type 90 II are the same...
PLA has put a lot of emphasis on electronics; there is no doubt that Type 99's electronics is better than AK's. BTW, type 99's armour is around 600mm, and 1000mm w/ERA, not 1200mm.
The AK is the copy of Type 90 II. Pakistan produces Type 90II under license designated AK. Prototype IV was fitted with western stuff for export only because some people trusts western stuff more. AK's gun is a 125 mm 48 calibre smoothbore gun. Germany doesn't produce 125 mm 48 calibre guns...
But would you if you had any mone? Keep in mind that you said you want to maximize individual utility.
That cannot ever be true. The job of government is to maximise the utility of the MAJORITY, since it's impossible to get ALL individuals to agree on a single subject. That means the...
Maximizing individual utility excludes donations, volunteering, and anything you don't gain from doing. Maximizing individual utility is selfish.
First of all, I never said unselfishness constitues donations of ALL property and that. I simply said donations are good things an unselfish...
I was simply pointing out few advantages aside from all the disadvantages. I never said these advantages are worth to risk for nor even mentioned that I supported an armed conflict and I'm no where near wishing the deaths of thousands. I SUPPORT PEACEFUL UNIFICATION. This is a scenario...
Maximizing utility of yourself while ignoring the utilities of others is selfish. Let me get this straight, you are won't donate any money to anyone because you want to maximize your inidividual utility?
First of all, these are donations, you still haven't explained how and why you compared...