Search results

How do you achieve the breakthrough of integrating TVC into the Engine's FDIC and the plane's Digital FCS, without first producing an engine with TVC and do a large number of ground and fly tests? Mr. Deino. Don't evade this honest question.

He said he has flown it, in a simulator, so he won't get court martial, as the details and identity of J-20's engine, is still highly classified. He is not stupid. In the 2011 interview, he has already said J-20 has achieved the breakthrough of integrating TVC into its Digital FCS. The pictures...

Several days ago, On Oct 13, I have posted an old interview of PLAAF J-10 test pilot, Senior Colonel 徐勇凌, who stated unmistakably, in 2011, shortly after the first flight, that TVC was integrated into J-20's Engine and Digital Flight Control System as one unit (矢量推力和飞发一体化), from the get go...

OMG! I just got an another warning from Mr. Deino for trolling. Is he that desperate to shut me down? LOL.

"But please: Why does CAC fits a non-TVC WS-10-variant on the J-20, if your alleged super-duper engine exists???" The first two pictures ARE fakes. The faker must have heard of something, and then go home and faked these two pictures. As I have said in my earlier post. Although, I believe the...

"OMG ... stupidity and stubborness in perfection." Is Mr. Deino talking about himself? "No operational TVC." Notice, the nozzles of the WS-15 engines was tilted toward the camera, into a nearly perfectly round circle, which would not have occurred, if it was not tilted, at all. The...

Since late last year, 2016, I have been asserting that J-20 has been using prototype version of WS-15, since day one of testing, and this engine has Thrust Vectoring Control (TVC) nozzles and it has, at least, 210kN of thrust. That J-20 was using an engine with TVC, from day one, has been...

Look at my old posts. Before, you said that's all optical illusions, show me pictures of other planes that has this "optical illusions" of tilted nozzles, and you have proved your point, and I will shut up for good, on this point...

J-20 HAS 3-D TVC along with WS-15 engines.

Wow, I just got a negative rating from Deino for calling the_gambler, a troller, while he got a free pass for insulting all our intelligences, for years, with his most stupid drivels. 1.) "Canard-is-not-stealthy-and-you-CAN'T-make-it-stealthy-no-matter-how-hard-you-tried-because-he-said-so"...

oh plz, leave that gambler_troll, alone, and let him talk to himself. 1.) It's enough for all to see, after several years of this sh*ts, that he has no clue on what he is talking about. 2.) He has proven with his...

hey everyone, don't feed this troller, the_gambler_guy, plz. It's a waste of your time, and pollutes this thread.

An excellent piece of CG drawing of, a J-20 passing through an icy canyon, by an outstanding artist. 高手绘制歼20版“骷髅中队”想象图

LOL. This is Russian "expert", Vasily Kashin, writing for the trashy Russian sputniknews wants to compare the production of J-20 with JH-7. Why not compare J-20 with Nanchang A-5? If there is one country in the world, which could produce a 5-gen fighter, in large numbers, and at an...

F-22's giant tail stabilizers, are actually much bigger, and has greater surface areas, than J-20's canards. According to the pakistaniGuy's claim that should be return greater RCS. Yes, this pakistaniGuy really is equating surface area with RCS return. And he really think by moving the...

So this pakistaniGuy really think he will end up with more money, if he moved his wallet from the back, to the front pocket. Some pakistani village is missing it's village idiot.

"give extra surface to radars" hey pakistaniGuy, J-20 merely has the tails, moved to the front, and now they are called canards. That don't give extra surface to radars. It's like moving your wallet, from your back pocket, to the front pocket, don't give you extra money in your wallet. If...

"CANARDS gives extra surface to the radars" Hey pakistaniGuy, the engineers at Lockeed Martin, must have made a big mistake, according to your silly theory, because they have designed, a giant flying wing, with wingspan 52.43 m and Wing surface area of 465.5 m². DIMENSIONS: Length 69.00 ft...

"I am not expert, but if the canard can return significant radar return, won't the main wing return huge radar return?" Exactly! You are better than those 'experts', because you have common sense.