Search results

lol, dude, when you say a bit more than a ton is "Close to MTOW". Is it "Close to MTOW" for a 28-ton MTOW aircraft to take off at 27 tons? ?

Dude, why is the flight manual for the f-18e the heaviest of the various mission loads, Also over a ton less than MTOW? Or can you show me evidence of your brother taking off from a carrier in MTOW? ? ?

wow, I have never seen an F-18E take off on a carrier in MTOW, on the contrary I can find a lot of F-18E not taking off on a carrier in MTOW. Since you say MTOW is the norm, can you provide evidence for your statement?

dude, why would you doubt an open news? ? ? The exchange of traps and catapults of a French Rafale on Ike and a US Super Hornet on CDG [Charles de Gaulle] not only displayed the versatility of each country’s naval air power, but was a striking visual of comradery in arms of two great powers at...

lol, your description of the F-18E payload was a great inspiration to me. Well, let's calculate based on the ejection limit of 27 tons, an aircraft with a maximum take-off weight of 28 tons. Can it satisfy combat when it is at 27 tons take off? ?

Dude, I can find similar data The C-13-3 in CdG has a stroke length of 246', and a launch speed of 140 knots at 70,000 pounds. RafaleM has a maximum take-off weight of 54,000 pounds, with an empty weight of 22,431 pounds...

Dude, you're the one playing dumb, you're using a WIKI data that doesn't have a source, and based on that you're assuming the f-18e can't take off with a full load，god

dude, apparently a 30 ton aircraft can run on a Charles de Gaulle, the data you know is wrong.LMFAO,lol

Dude, I have a hard time understanding why you think the 267 ft Catapult is not enough for a 28 ton jet when it can catapult in the 32 ton? ?

Why does China need to have these? Do you think the Rafale's weight is the upper limit for this catapult? ?

so what? Being able to operate a Rafale doesn't meet your needs?

WOW, no 30 tons is a light aircraft? Even if the f-18c is only 23541kg? ? ? lol

Wow, in your eyes, the 24500kg Rafale is as light aircraft as the 24500lb A-4? ? ? lol 24500kg is light aircraft？？？

You are basically sitting duck? ? ? ? lol, this is exactly an 850ft aircraft carrier LOL

Obviously, what you say and what I say are not the same thing at all. I never said that TAKE and off are simultaneous. So back to the original point, India’s 40,000-ton aircraft carrier can operate with a length of 195m runway, so why can’t it operate a 300ft catapult runway? Why do you think...

what? Ski Jump length alone is not enough for a fighter to truly have combat capability. You need to run off length. When an Indian carrier is capable of deck operations with a run off length of 195m, what makes you think the same cannot be done with a 300ft catapult?

LOL, you can certainly take off at 1/4 to 1/3 the length of the deck, and then like I said with the f-35b, that's when the load on the plane drops off dramatically. Dude, don't you know that the MiG-29 can only take off with anti-ship weapons when it is in the red box I marked? And in the...

Completely correct. This is the official data.

LOL, Ski Jump is SHORTER than any catapult?? How short is the Ski Jump of the MiG 29 in India carrier?? ?

No, it's your fault. Because the QE uses the short takeoff and landing F-35B, not the carrier-based F-35C that normally takes off and lands on the Ford. The price paid for this is that when the load is 1 ton, the combat radius is only two-thirds of the F-35C with a load of 2 tons.