Search results

Actually, you still saved a lot all thru these years. You did not need to run manhattan project, courtesy Soviet Union. You didn't need to develop Mig-21, since Sovient Union gave you the technology on a platter. Still, if you are cribbing "we spent a lot" .... then you should ask yourself...

No dear, we need to make a jetliner to New York: 1. US is a friend. 2. We need to have a safe landing in NY (like a jetliner does), unlike a "boom" on Beijing. :laugh: :laugh: The cartoon is a nice one. :tup:

hmm.. good for india, but unfortunately bad for me. I was stockpiling dollars for repatriation ... hoping for an NRI issue. Now what do I do with all the dolllars I saved and pulled out of investments !!! Sheeeeet.. I missed the golden chance.... I should have pumped back the money last...

If all you have got is "J-10" to show for the spending .. it's pretty pathetic. If the intention of western countries' arms embargo on china was to make it re-invent every type of wheel ever invented by mankind (and make it pay through nose, inventing those wheels)... they succeeded a bit too...

Yes, India won't be proud of Nanking rape .. we just don't do such things. But since you say so, do you imply that Japan has a right to be proud of Nanking rape? And their "guts" to commit the Nanking rape, still makes then a giant in the eyes of all chinese. Hah .... strange...

neither shanghai pigs. they are unique to shanghai.

That depends on where china's border starts from... :laugh: Let's not include the PRC colonies of Tibet and Xinjiang....but from china's actual self-defined historical border along the "great wall of china", how far is beijing? Please let us know, mr. chinese liar.

Indeed.. they are the ones who raped Nanking. Perhaps thats why china thinks Japan is the "giant" whose shadow still looms large. India isn't out to rape Nanking .. and this has nothing to do with Agni-5 or Agni-15. We just don't do such things... as the history shows. India's...

With you utter lack of knowlege about facts, you have made most of your posts irrelevant at best. It's a US offer ... they are free to offer whatever they want to. India hasn't accepted the offer yet. Going by past records, the pricing is unlikely to work out unless there is license...

Miss New York is first Indian-American to win Miss America (Reuters) - Nina Davuluri won the 2014 Miss America pageant on Sunday, becoming the first Indian-American to wear the crown, which went to Miss New York for the second year in a row. "I'm so happy this organization has celebrated...

meanwhile, US and Russia concluded a deal without bothering about china. for all the jumping up and down, PRC ends up looking a clown in the world arena. now, PRC "welcomes" the deal between US and Russia... like a good boy.

This is sounding strange to me: Agni IV has a range of 4000 km, but weighs only 17 tonnes. But.. Agni V has a range of 5000 km, but weighs 50 tonnes. Seems.. .Agni V uses technologies of Agni III and before. Why don't they use Agni IV techonologies for Agni V ?? 50 tonnes isn't...

Well, no crashes for HAL Tejas too... now you would say first country to have no fatality in an initial 4th gen fighter aircraft, either. I am not saying that the probability of an accident can be eliminated. But it can be reduced, and should be reduced ... and rigors of design and meticulous...

Japan doesn't need a ballistic missile (atleast a long range one) ... why should they bother about hitting Xinjiang, when Beijing needs only an SRBM and Shanghai atmost an MRBM.

India did not invent PPP measure... or did it? As for the topic .... US Treasuries are the safest deposits for USD. No bank can ever be safer than Federal Reserve (for USD). As already clarified, for INR deposits, the safest market instrument is GoI treasury-bills and long term issuances...

SBI is considered almost at par with the Indian sovereign.. with implicit guarantees by the Central govt for rupee deposits. That is why INR deposits with SBI are almost good as lending to GoI (i.e. NIL risk). For non-INR deposits too, SBI is considered to be a proxy for Indian Sovereign...

you could start with this forum itself: http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-forum/57331-china-tries-hide-j-10-fighter-crashes.html

Yes, the plane which the chinese "brag" about is photoshopped, even while PRC tries to hide the true plane. So, except for censorship slips (which are off course true, and show quite a horrible crash record), the plane ("J-10") which is talked about is all about photoshopped versions.

Did you look up "J-10" after all the chinese bragging? heheh. :laugh: "J-10" crash probability is larger than Brahmos miss probability. :laugh: That's comparing apples to oranges... but its the same because chinese don't have either an apple or an orange....only photoshopped pictures of an...

China is buying Su-35 from Russia ... and not TOT technology. Leave alone that .. the Su-35s will be built completely in Russia. It's not even going to be licence produced in china. And this.. after china abruptly stopped production of "J-10" ... perhaps PLAAF found it to be completly...