Search results

What you "said wrong" was linking the judge's religion to his judgement. We don't think like that in India. Cool, I am happy if they take it to supreme court. That is the democratic way to settle disputes. But they have not decided it by the way, all the lawyer said is that they will study...

No, it is the greatness of a secular democracy. In any mature secular democracy, be it the USA, West European countries - anywhere - the judge does not allow his religion to influence his judgements. I am apalled by the constant 'Muslims first' refrain I keep hearing by Pakistani members on...

You are a pathetic creature who cannot think beyond religion. Read what the Muslim judge has to say below: Gist of findings by the Hon SU Khan: Thank god we don't have bigoted religious fanatics like you anymore. Yes, as you were saying earlier above, Partition was a good thing.

Read the judgement summary posted a few posts above, you bigot. It is established that all parties had a justified right to the land title. hence the land is divided into three parts. This is not Pakistan. Judgements are on the basis of merit, not religion.

Yeah, IMPARTIAL, all uppercase. Read this: Gist of findings by the Hon SU Khan: Now where are those bigoted Pakistani posters who were spreading rumours earlier stating that the judgement is 2-1 and that the Muslim was the dissenting one? Very typical conspiracy theories! What more can...

Breaking down the mosque was wrong, I am not condoning that. BUT - this case was to decide on the title of the land, it had nothing to do with anything else. All the court is saying is that, it is established based on certain evidence, that even before the mosque came up, Hindus were...

The point is, the court established that Hindus had been visiting this place as far as hundreds of years back in the belief that it was lord Rama's birthplace. This establishes that this land did have religious significance for the Hindus even before the Mosque came up. That is what the point...

I mean, just observe the reaction of most Pakistanis here. Most of them are crying that the entire land was not given to Muslims. On the other hand, every Indian on this page is rejoicing that the Muslims and Hindus have both been given land in an impartial manner. Really shows the difference in...

This is all that you people can come up with. When an impartial verdict is delivered, you start bitching about past history. How about concentrating on the immense persecution that Ahmadiya Muslims, Hindus and Christians face in Pakistan on a daily basis? Do you want links? I have access to...

Gunner: You are the only Pakistani on this page who has provided sensible and impartial posts. The others had already made up their mind to bash India, no matter what the verdict is. I cannot think of a fairer judgement than this.

Yes, it certainly was. Good riddance. Who knows, India might have been where Pakistan is today if partition had not happened.

"grape r sours " indeed. Pathetic character. It has been proved during this case that this particular land was being frequented by Hindu worshippers for hundreds of years who believed that this is the birthplace of lord Rama. The part where the idols of Rama are kept has been given to the...

Guys, two Pakistani members here are writing misleading and mischievous posts, and claiming that the judgement is "in favour of Hindus", contrary to what the judgement actually is. This is pure rumour mongering. Please report their posts. This is a very popular site and comes high up on...

I am disgusted with you guys. Bigots, utter bigots. Just cannot see beyond religion. I'm beginning to understand you people better and better. You rumour monger, the land is to be divided, that is the verdict. Edit your post.

Delete/edit your post, you rumour monger! The judgement is that the land will be divided into three parts. One part will be Hindu Ram JanmaBhoomi, whereas the rest will be given to Sunni Waqf board to build mosque.

1. We don't know what the judgement is, yet. 2. Secular does not equal Muslim. It is like that in Pakistan, but in India, cases are judged on the basis of merit, and not religion.

I see that Fasih Khan has edited his post, so I am editing mine and removing the aggressive part. Calling India a "so-called" democracy and "so-called" secular does not sound good from the mouths of you people. The truth is, the Pakistani forumers on this page, including you, are all waiting...

That is how these people are, I am beginning to realize. They will be delighted and clap in glee if riots do happen and of lots of people are killed. And here, we silly sentimental Indians go and type 10 pages of "RIP" messages in each thread related to Pakistanis dying in terrorist attacks...

What the hell do you mean, "can you deny that"? I mean, the judgement is not even out yet, how the hell can you expect someone to 'deny' it? What sort of a question is that?

1. You already do mock all these things, and this is all the more surprising since all these problems are either as much, or more pronounced in Pakistan, than in India. Also, you know that there is much more that Indians can criticize about Pakistan in addition to these aspects. 2. The world...