Search results

Pretty impressive,eh!!!

You really didn't have to prove the "dumb by birth" part, but I'm glad that you did!!!

Was a Pakistani. What did I tell you about the smell!!!!

Asad Ismi US Drone Killings in Waziristan. Indepth Investigation by American and Pakistani Lawyers | Global Research Kisse buddhu bana rahe ho?

Yes, you are. It would suit that you acted your capability.

What natural brothers? What about your "brothers" in Syria, in China, in Sri Lanka, in Myanmar?

Maafi maangte hai, Sahib. Par jab dehkho le log bakwas karte rehte hain.

Please present the profile of the author then. It's only fair!!!

Sure. My brothers belong to me!!! Would you claim the same with your illegal brothers that are not wanted anywhere? Greek minister terms Pak, Bangladesh illegal immigrants ‘tragedy’ - World - DAWN.COM Nobody...like seriously, cares!!!

Not really... I have been abroad...You dudes are the saddest, no offense!!!

Was I right or wrong? I still haven't looked up the author...but I can smell him good enough!!!

This is fundamentally opposed from forming local militias to attack sovereign nations. There is no confusion. This is what the man said: While we may dance around what he meant by jihad, the fact that he points it towards my nation and asks for Pakistani volunteers is worrying.

I don't need to read it... but this is written by a Pakistani!!! Yes...? No....? Nice to know that you are always right on the internet!!! :enjoy:

Like I said before, I do understand the motivations behind the video. Domestic violence needn't be perpetrated by men alone. More importantly, emotional torture or mental abuse isn't recognized on the same pedestal as physical violence in the eyes of the law. That said, I do think that a crowd...

Hina Rabbani Khar breached protocol. While I believe India should've put her on the very next flight to Pakistan, she's a nobody in the larger scheme of things. Whereas Nawaz Sharif is the premier of Pakistan. His movements would've been thoroughly vetted by Indian authorities. There simply was...

Innocent? Me? M'kay!!! :P My question was rather focusing on how calling for jihad and soliciting volunteers comes under protected speech. The analogy of American senators just wouldn't fit in this context as I pointed out in my earlier post. I wasn't trying to imply any innocence on the part...

I'm not sure how calling for final jihad against another country and soliciting the local crowd(Pakistanis, not Indians) for volunteers falls under protected speech. I'm yet to hear about a congressional speech that implored the US public to form militias and wage war on foreign nations.

What I'm unsure of is the context of your statement. Are you trying to say that an untrained and unarmed woman can match the lethality(grievous or permanent damage) of a man as long as she has the "knee him in the giblets" move with her? That would be a plain ridiculous claim not worthy of a...

Panelists, not "Penalists".

While I understand the motivations behind this video, I feel the crowd's reaction is perfectly justified. A violent man could put a woman in a hospital or even land a fatal blow. A violent woman, unless she was well trained which would make her an exception, can't match the level of damage...