Search results

Source needed.

You should be confident in yourself. :-)

All we can do is wait with regard to WS-15.

New destroyer has been laid next to 055 #3 and 4. DSIC is catching up with JSGC.

If those guests don't take it seriously, why should we?

That's ridiculous.

Actually, it should be "earlier this year".

It's an honest suggestion for all Chinese military watchers.

Don't watch discussion programmes on CCTV-4.

2101 was originally denoted 2018.

No.15 of the 01 batch count from 2011.

No. 635 and 636 Z-20s participated in and successfully completed high-altitude flight tests on 9th October. The tests were performed at three different airports with altitudes over 1000 m, 3000 m and 4000 m located in three provinces in China.

It's a concept.

That's SAC Aviation Museum.

According to the 《军品价格管理办法》([1996]计价管108号文), no matter how much the cost is, the profit should always be 5%. Thus if the cost of those fighters had been somehow raised by 60%, it is also responsible for PLAAF to buy them with 60% higher price. We cannot maintain the price while the cost is...

That is impossible. Military trading in China is a buyer's market. You can not sell something to PLA at whatever price you want.

Should be no more than four. No comment on the rest.

That is within expectation. Actually, every active SSBN with a single pressure hull has an either large or small hump, including the Triomphant-class. All tests of JL-2 were performed by Type 31. Thus it is not very possible for you to spot the differences between JL-2 and the next-gen SLBM...

Those large light hulls with noncircular cross section were meant for several smaller pressure hulls, but light hulls with circular cross section contains only one. I don't see any clear evidence to design such a large pressure hull with a diameter over 14 m. Also, 14 m is too large for a...