Search results

Please don't use the word 'seculars' for these people. A word was coined - sickulars. That is apt. The real seculars are not of the kinds like Barkha dutt and the rest of their sickular traitorous ilk. I count myself as secular and would hate to think that many others like me get a bad name...

No, you don't. But the links and people cultivated then linger on. It would take atleast a couple of decades for these people to die off.

Ofcourse. Pakistan Army has been into UK and US based propaganda before we even understood what that is. Developed because of Pakistani connections to the West till the early 2000's on account of SEATO/CENTO and alliance with US. We only got into the concept in 2000's.

Good job Italy.

Indeed. So do we.

If that was the case then Pakistan would have lost Balochistan long back. In this case, it was simply a mistake for the Indian HM to assume that Pakistanis would behave in a civil manner. We are fools to believe Pakistan can be reasoned with.

Forgot to mention that its been more than 20 years that the original has come out. Idiots.

No. We don't have the problem of terrorists coming from China. That's a Pakistan specific problem.

Rajnath Singh should not have gone. A terrorist state is not the place for the respected Home Minister to go. Bangladesh got it right. They refused to send their Minister. We should have followed suit. At the very least the State support of Pakistani terrorists comes out in the open again. So...

Jamaatis a$$ on fire.

You're right in that we have very limited in indigenous production, but things are moving in that direction mate. We have started exporting naval ships and soon missiles export will also start.

See, I don't disagree at all that Center should help JH. I have seen the level of poverty there, it will hurt any sensible person with a conscience. However, what I donot like is that any state should blame Center for non-development. We have States with massive budgets. We elect our own...

Indeed. So what? Pakistan with Chinese and American arms is also a casual smack down. Doesn't stop Pakistan from having nuisance value for us. You get the idea.

Indeed. It is.

Now your statement is correct. You mention East Asia. As long as China sticks to East Asia, India has no problems with China. However since China is not doing that and wants to take lands that are under Indian control, the Subcontinent will also try to expand and influence East Asia.

We know. And we want you to spend your funds on Kashmir...and we want you to keep sending your youth to India! We wish all your youth, the entire sum total, come to Kashmir.

China will never be allowed to become the hegemon of Asia.

Not enough if you ask me.

Good. It would have been used to spread global jihad.

It pains me to see that and I have relations there. I have seen it myself. However I still concur that Jharkhandi people are responsible for their own misery. The Central Govt was so against Gujarat govt, yet Gujarat prospered because of good management and innovative ideas. An example would...