1)This is what happens when you have a bankrupt economy. This is sad but true.
2)GDP of Iran is $514 billion with less than 40% of the population of Pakistan having GDP of $240 billion. Money talks and it is the hard reality.
Sitting in West Bengal and seeing Bengali newspapers giving almost daily updates on BD election, it seems that the situation there is in mess. Our main concern is refugee problem like 1971. Now, both Delhi and State Government are monitoring the border strictly and Delhi is trying to avoid such...
The Allahabad address(1930) by Iqbal was the beginning of a new chapter in Indian history.But, what he said was not what were being said about it in 1940s.:coffee:
1) Not Khilji, but Slave dynasty. (1206)
2) Time period 1206 -1707. Maratha 1710s-1810s. British 1757/1810s-1947.
3)The term is wrong in modern history. There were many states in India of different communities. Only Mughals (1526-1707) united them.
His father washed away all the money. The treasury was empty. Rebellion was taking place everywhere. He was a destiny's step-child. No a single thing was going right at that time.
@Contrarian
my 4th and 5th point rebuttal(see#21)
‘It’s A Myth That Muslim Rulers Destroyed Thousands Of Temples’
The next time you are stuck in a conversation on whether India was ruled by oppressive Muslim kings or not, whether Hindus were converted en masse to Islam in medieval India, just...
see post #18 and I have discussed two points.
Third point:- He wanted to make India an islamic state.
Rebuttal:-At that time, Marathas already declared that Marathas are going to make India a Hindu state and started fighting against the Mughals and they did it later. It was just a reaction...
He also imposed Zakat on Muslims . And, percentage of Zakat was greater than Jazia. Again, Jazia was imposed on the 21st year of his rule. It was mainly for financial reason. Even women and handicapped hindus were excluded. But, every Muslim had to give Zakat.
Tell me just one think - Will you...
May I use it in future? No copyright...:partay:
Not at all.Counter versions are now emerging which is far from what is taught in schools. I myself can give rebuttal of every point you have in your mind.
This is well documented.You will find this in the books of Satish Chandra, Atahar Ali,Gautam Vadra etc.
Satish Chandra - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Satish Chandra is an Indian historian, whose main area of specialisation is medieval... He was a Reader in History at Aligarh Muslim...
This is the wrong history which is taught in schools. Modern historian even do not support a single word in this regard. Many have given point by point rebuttal to prove that it was a propaganda of a certain section.