On September, 23 the Governor of Sverdlovsk Region Yevgeny Kuyvashev said at a press conference that new tracked combat platform Armata will be presented at the RAE 2013 only for a private show.
On September, 25 Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said the Armata will be presented for public...
I think it refers to the maneuvering capabilities of the Su-35 in WVR combat. This is a quote from an interview with Sergey Bogdan, test-pilot of Sukhoi Design Bureau. He comments on techniques shown during a demonstration flight at Le Bourget 2013.
Full interview with him was published in...
Thank you for the comprehensive answer and interesting links.
"Neither did the Soviets and that is why they let him published his work to the public."
Ufimtsev's work is from applied if not fundamental physics area, so nothing secret was in it. Nobody payed attention to this work probably...
S-400 are already on combat mission in central and far east regions of Russia. In 3-4 years they completely replace old S-300. S-350 was presented in "hardware" at MAKS and at Obukhov plant and seems to be ready for production. BTW it seems to be a sister for the latest S-Korean system also...
Thanks for an attention to my simple remark. Including quote from CV and basics for math methods of 3D objects modeling.
Guess next question will be on physical or geometrical optics.
So US researchers never use physical modeling?
New Russian S-350 SAM system was presented recently at MAKS 2013 exhibition.
Source is:
otvaga2004.ru/fotoreportazhi/vystavki-vooruzheniya/50r6-vityaz-s-350-na-maks-2013/
Its tactical data in comparison with S-400
S-350
Maximal target speed: not disclosed currently
Detection range: not...
Target detection, identification and tracking against the natural interferences is a serious technical task. It is more complicated in circumstances of countermeasures: false targets, imitation jamming. Mistakes are possible even in a very plain circumstances. For example Aegis system was...
Our dialog seems to be counterproductive. What exactly you want me to prove? First of all you have to post some reliable link to that interview. I can post link to Zelin's interview before MAKS 2011 but it is in Russian. And it contains no such words you quoted.
AESA means that each element of antenna's aperture is active and emits energy. PESA has one or several powerfull sources of emission which then is distributed over antenna's aperture by means of phase inverting circuits. That is only technology. Both are electronically scanned and computer...
It is fake. The link is not reliable. And there is no such interview in russian.
Which exactly?
Exact tactical and techical characteristics comparison. AESA vs PESA
Can you explain what is the difference between PESA and AESA radars from the combat operational use point of view?I think there is no difference if they have same tactical characteristics.
Some news on current topic.
Taken from russian media militaryparitet-com_ttp_data_ic_ttp_6009_ which in turn translated from chinese article mil-news-sina-com-cn_2013-07-23_0929732367-html (replace '-' with '.' and '_' with '/' except "2013-07-23". Chinese expert reports his opinion on su-35...