Search results

I am sorry to say ....but it is clearly about Muslims. Denial is not a river in Egypt. How many Hindus in west bengal do you think is participating in this Protest ? .....come on ...take a guess...

Muslim population in West Bengal in 1947 was 9% ...........in 1951 it was 9.9% ..........in 1991 it was 12.1 per cent ...........today its 26% :enjoy: Assam figures are even more impressive :cheesy:

Its interesting your brought in UP and 'Mandal'......and that is precisely the reason why BJP needs Ram Mandir. Development is sufficient for BJP in Gujarat ....but development and 'anti-corruption' are not really vote catchers in the rest of India. Congress knows this....BJP knows it too...

That 'hollering for a temple' came from the aam admi. BJP did what any good political party should do ....forward that demand of the people and bring it to the parliament. I see nothing wrong with that. Congress tried to do the same thing...but BJP beat them to it. I blame the congress...

Its a Naive reply. BJP in those days did not exist ....in 1987 they had grand total of '2' TWO seats in the Lok Sabha. ........ Facts are staring at your in the face ...if you choose not to look at them, I cant help it. BJP is a national party today because of the Ram Mandir ....its real...

I put the "upper caste" and "lower caste" in quotes to highlight there is no difference between them (the same way i put 'secular' to indicate they are not actually secular). Its your prejudice/grudge (maybe against me :P) that makes you see things that are not there. You might want to think...

...assumptions being Pakistanis are Logical.

This should be sufficient reply, Hope you take the effort to Read it. Ayodhya-the-battle-for-Indias-soul The American approach ...its slow and steady and is not divisive..............it allows for Afro Americans to acknowledge the contribution of White society in ending discrimination...

'Secular' politics is a synonymous with religious identity politics. Any one who finds it necessary to include 'secular' in their speech is steadily and surely drifting way from that path. You object to 'Rath Yatra' because you identify 'Rath' with Hinduism ....'Rath' means 'chariot'...

Reasons for the infamy of of Manusmriti is complex........but devolution of hindu society and school of thought due to conditions brought about by a near continuous barbaric invasion for more than a 1000 years would be one of the prime reasons. Hindus have suffered all kinds of degradation...

Its a 40 year late reaction to the HAJ subsidy. BJP has come to terms with the fact that even if and when it comes to power it may be difficult to turn of the Haj subsidy tap due to the objections by 'Secular' parties. The are merely trying to correct one wrong with another one.

Let me correct you.....only the Brahmins were advised not crossing the seas do to reasons I have detailed in my earlier post. It was open to other casts. Rig Vedic references to early seafarers - The oldest evidence on record is supplied by the Rig Veda, which contains several references to...

Dead WRONG. Hinduism was more amenable to change and provided space for other religion was because it encouraged asking questions which went beyond the standard dogma. Even Vedas were allowed to be questioned and everyone was allowed to discover their own path to god, build their own...

WRONG ....that obligation has been paid in full by establishing a SECULAR CONSTITUTION.........There is no additional burden for the Hindus to carry. FAIL .....Shingala did what they did to the Tamils because SL did not have a secular constitution. Nonsense ...... in fact Article 370 grants...

....so what your are saying is if hindus build the Ram temple in Ayodhya, Muslims will kill all the hindus and have a blood bath ...... ....and this is somehow the fault of the Hindus :lol: ......and that they are the bigots :angel:

If there is no legal request for the temple being moved and if the court has sanctioned legality to the temple what is there is discuss? ......and quite frankly I dont care if the temple hurts your feeling or not ..only your apparent bigotry a.k.a 'secularism'.:P ...My point was there is no...

Unfortunately that is exactly how the law works ..... Your attempts to obfuscate the issue aside, the fact remains it is a structure with significant religious symbolism. That small temple is also an attempt to dilute that Islamic identity of that monument and make it more 'secular' so to...

WRONG .... there is no proof of that. If you cannot prove it you should take it back and apologize for the same. As it is, your credibility is an all time low :rolleyes:

Good thing then that we do not have 'polite company' in Indias Neighborhood. He would be perfect man to deal with paksitan. I think Modi will be Kick@$$.

LOL ...when the High court has asked for the temple to be restored its status becomes legal by default. You cannot restore an 'Illegal structure'. "Relation d’un voyage fait au Levant" by Jean de Thévenot mentions this in his book. Now show me proof of the "Malaria Story" :lol: Why not...