Search results

i voted turkey since its a nato member turkish military regularly trains with other nation in nato and non nato partners. the equipment is also on average more advance than any other muslim country Pakistan should be second since not only they train regularly with other countries pakistani...

it really isnt it has some 85+ fighter jets many of them like the the mig-25 and su-24 are old the mig-29 and su-30s are the only fighters that have some potential these fighters are not supported by any awac all the equipment is foreign compare that to

th they have always been doing that back in the 90s they bought out all the news papers so no one could read the article exposing their incompetence

PAF would be better of buy F-16s like it did from Jordan countries like Belgium, Netherlands, Norway even US etc are going to be getting rid of their F-16s as they replace them with f-35 these f-16s would be relatively cheap and considering how much experience PAF has had with this aircraft no...

its meant to be a light weight multirole fighter that mean it should be able to carry out precision strikes I suppose PAF is still in the process of configuring LGB to this fighter

i really like when you said "Middle East seems to have a date with the middle ages" sadly it is very true

not going for the j-10B is completely logical. Introducing a different aircraft with similar capabilities as f-16s and jf-17 will be a great hassle. PAF already has the infrastructure well in place for F-16 and JF-17 so it would be better to induct more of these fighters and start working on 5th...

Mirages with rose upgrades is quiet a potent fighter they have night attack capability as well as BVR, these aircraft are also capable of firing Raad cruise missile giving the excellent stand off capability and not to mention they are capable of arial refueling now . F-7 PG is also quiet capable...

so PAF had 40 f-16s originally then came 14 from the US that were embargoed +13 from Jordan and the 18 Block 52+ that makes a total of 85 F-16s in PAF according to my calculation

110,000 for ssg is terrible idea since it will compromise training around 20,000+(not including ssgn or ssw) is a better number for ssg and 200,000+ regular with most of it mechanized with armored vehicles instead of toyota pickups i would however suggest making the regular army smaller but...

forget Israel i was only using it as an example take south korea, turkey even Egypt there are so many examples of countries smaller than pakistan yet they have a technologically advance air force

i guess rely on your better trained people people are the most valuable asset of any organization and i agree f-16 and jf-17 are not enough we need a dedicated air superiority fighter that can protect the strike package consisting of f-16 and jf-17 su-30mki gives india a qualitative...

if people have watched the defense minister's speech the guys clearly undermines the sacrifices made by the army. the military has always delivered to the best of its abilities every time these corrupt politicians are too busy sucking the blood out of the poor. the only at times when military...

I am sure everyone has heard the phrase "quantity has a quality of its own" but i think it bullshit what pakistan needs to do is to reduce the size of the army and divert those resources to the air force air force and navy are alway the real war winners Pakistan can never match the numerical...

Bull shit there is nothing in the constitution that says that PAF will not operate twin engine fighters also why would Quid e Azam say that it doesnt make any sense

he is the tallest in the second photograph too only Lyndon Johnson was taller that him whats with him and jacqueline kennedy

We must never, ever give in to terrorists.

a dead terrorist is a good terrorist

oh sorry i didnt mean to ask you it was a different post