Search results

On a more serious note- Rapid rise of a nation always causes problems for existing power equations. Europe grappled with the "German problem" and the issue ended in war......History has shown that rapidly rising powers cannot be accommodated and war comes sooner or later. China is Asia's...

We do it regularly.....every five years. Not like China where the same cr@p lasts a century.

All Indians support Tibetan's aspiration to be a free nation. India should recognize the Tibetan Government in exile and provide "moral" support to their struggle against China.

Hmm...South Tibet...That's a good one. Fake history writing is flourishing in Chinese Universities? First you get out of Tibet, then will will talk of South Tibet. India may start its "moral" support for Tibet's struggle anytime.

Why do you think Japan cannot counter China. Japan is a nuclear power who has not revealed it so far due to American Defense umbrella. It's just a screwdriver turn away from making bombs.

I think Mamata has agreed to the Enclave issue now.. That should make you happy. You seem to be a congenital India hater who is making much of a few problems which any 2 neighboring countries will have.

Long term foreign policy is too important to be left to the individual whims and fancies of Prime Ministers. Having his origins in present Pakistan, the PM may carry an emotional baggage which distorts his objectivity. Peace with Pak, and issues such as Siachen are all in Pak's interest...

Upper Paleolithic is at least 25000 years ago. Basically stone age.... Too early for Harrapan or for trade links.

^^^^^^ It is well known that the Western powers want to facilitate a breakup of Pakistan. The operations in Afghanistan are for exporting civil war to Pakistan and facilitating its breakup. India and Israel support this policy. After 2008, there is a view in policy circles that a much...

Most defense analysts in India have a view that a weak, truncated Pakistan is in India's interest .....Don't know why you think otherwise. The Western consensus is also for breaking up Pakistan which it perceives to be a rogue, nuclear armed state which is nothing but permanent trouble. You...

Data speaks for itself. I just made an observation. It is for you to disprove the overwhelming preponderance of evidence.

First let us accept that religious bias is preventing objectivity. Only after that reasons can be looked into. Here we have people who are not able to agree to a conclusion. Why point is there then to discuss reasons?

Yes! it does invalidate my hypothesis that 100% Muslims hate Modi. I accept that. Now I m convinced that only 99.999% do so. I m just making a claim based on empirical data. The underlying reasons can be researched into. If 50% Muslims support Modi and 50% dont, then only it can be asserted...

Yes! it does invalidate my hypothesis that 100% Muslims hate Modi. I accept that. Now I m convinced that only 99.999% do so. I m just making a claim based on empirical data. The underlying reasons can be researched into.

I have not moved the goalposts. I have simply iterated my response according to the data. So if I find one Muslim among a thousand favoring Modi, Vanishingly Minuscule is the exact term to use. What specific actions on part of Modi you may be alluding to?

Ok! Thanks. So now I change my assessment as follows: But for a vanishingly minuscule minority who assess Modi's performance objectively, the overwhelming majority of Muslims are viscerally against Modi simply on account of their religion.

Can you point out a single article supporting Modi which is written by a Muslim? Even a blog piece will do. If you cant, it is proof enough the Muslim's opposition to Modi is not objective but based on religion.

Good! Carry on.:pakistan: The result of your efforts have turned against their handlers and are now destroying your own country. Well served justice for meddling with other nations. Divine retribution if it ever was.:partay:

And how long has Switzerland been independent? Was it also sucked dry by colonialism which reduced its GDP from 25% of world to 3%. The reason for comparing India and Pak is that they started from the same baseline. For India, valid comparison would be countries like China, or Thailand which...

Is it the general thought of the Chinese people? Appears rather unrealistic. I don't see much reason for such optimism. China is an old country with a landward orientation and with competing countries all around. It is also resource and technology poor.China will certainly be a very important...