Search results

Lets keep this pretty simple. How long does it take for you to detect, identify, lock on and fire a missile ? Coming from a hundred of KM away and varying its trajectory from HI-LO or the other way around. BTW 290 KMs is range attained in LO-HI-LO profile. Time to target is less than five...

I've told you before. Forget about having missiles to be able a missile such as Brahmos. You dont have reaction time. How many missiles in your inventory have intercepted targets flying at Mach 2.8 before ? Who told you we can't do a HIGH-LO profile if we wanted when the target is within...

Such a powerful, well trained man you are indeed. Try undoing what has been done.

I happen to disagree with this. Some of the codifications of thought processes and beliefs ingrained by the religion in an organized manner have been a hurdle in overcoming fundamentalism and conflict within the Muslim society. I'm moving away from the topic here but since I'm done with...

Talk is cheap. :cheers:

You're better off telling that to a terrorist. He's killing innocent people. You're yet to do that my friend. However you dont have to prove me wrong. Prove the terrorists wrong. Thats more important if you feel the urge to prove something. Have a great day.

I dont want to believe something is the cause for another thing. You're wrong. You cannot prove me wrong in my conclusion that you're indeed a Muslim. Can you?

I have a little context. Prove me wrong.

That would make me stupid. I dont decide without the background and context.

Dont forget the context. Okay, which specific act of Islamic terrorism was actually called so without any of us knowing the backgrounds of the perpetuators ? Again. Should I think you're fooling me when you're saying you're Muslim ?

The context of the terrorist act and the background of the individual.

Dont forget the context and background. :-) All that has to be said has been said. You could add another post or two, ask another question or two and have this thread locked up and pinned high above all other threads as proof of the superiority and integrity of the Quran being proved in this...

He would want to debate the Quran and prove that his understanding is the correct one. A simple acknowledgement of the diversity of perceptions and interpretations is too much to ask. Yet the hypocrisy would continue in the form of many sects and mutual slaughter within the Muslim society...

No, it is not.

What does perception have to do with logic ?

Ask the terrorist. He's the guy doing the killing and claiming it in the name of Islam or Quran.

Why do you forget the context and background of the event happening? If one were to observe them they'd know the truth.

What I percieve is not always wrong either, my friend. Your interpretation of Quran may not be the same as his.

In other words, the non-Muslim world calls it according to what it percieves.

Perception. Didn't I mention the right context and background as a pre-requirement ?