Search results

Agree

That post was not a detailed engineering discussion. J79 has more potentional upgrading options to work on, such upgrading to twin spool 3th generation turbojet. I don't think you are more familiar than me with what going on iran in turbojet upgrading projects. I am ready to discuss about j79...

All of Iranian F-4 equipped with Iranian modified j79 Which is better than Al21f . Modifications ,,/ Inlet temperature of turbin increased to 1100 degree centigrade Compressor blade (shape and material) changed to inject more air Ignation box (insulation and nozzles,) modified to carry...

We should base a modern inhand platform such mig29 and define new project that inject f14, f4, f5 and .... Features on it and stealth feature also. Qaher is : Small but installing j79 or Al21 on it with size up-scaling give more power than f20 or Pakistanian jf-17 or f16 also in single engine...

Very good evidence to go to F-20 design. Thank you for video But don't forget need of big nose for bigger radar and mid wing design.

Do you name nano technology carbon fiber reinforced composite a plywood?

Anti Navy role

Turbine inlet temperature of Al21f3 is more than j-79 and it because of kind of Thermal barrier coating, coated on Al2qf3 turbine blade. So increasing turbine inlet temperature of j-79 convert it to high performance engine.

F-20 manufacturing is not cheap also but for A2A role is good choice. Look at what Iriaf thinking in this maket. Q Qaher is a modified F-5 with a weapon bay under it which can change landing gear location also. Very good solution which with this Technic a Qaher can be based on F-4 also.

Some problem should solved in F5 such as: 1-Landing gear location 2-Radar low space 3-Mid wings instead of low wings 4-Operating range F-20 is not a solution but jf-17 may be better. 1-More hardpoints 2-Bigger radar 3-More range 4-More space for future upgrade 5-Economical Better than f-20...

F-20 manufacturing is not cheap also but for A2A role is good choice. Look at what Iriaf thinking in this maket.

1-More hardpoints 2-Bigger radar 3-More range 4-More space for future upgrade 5-Economical Better than f-20 in CAS but in A2A role f-20 is better.

Some problem should solved such as: 1-Landing gear location 2-Radar low space 3-Mid wings instead of low wings 4-Operating range F-20 is not a solution but jf-17 may be better.

Better idea than F35 but more heavier, Twin engine F35 make more sense.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-iran-drones-idUSKCN1UC1X4

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/irans-sad-attempt-reverse-engineering-old-f-5f-fighter-66341

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/see-old-plane-it-killed-4-f-15s-simulated-battles-sky-65981

Not a real fighter