1. our carrier will be at 500 km distance.
2. our CBG ships will be at 300 km distance.
3. couple of sub,frigates, and destroyers etc will be brought to 200 km distance from your shore for the blockade.
3.our migs has 3000km with three drop tanks.so it can easily provide air cover, can...
But you didn't answer my assumption that how our AC can stay 500km away while the the front running CBG ships can be a at distance of 400 - 300 km away from your shore, and so on...
@Secur
you continue to insist that Indian IGB can't stay 500km away and provide air cover.please reply to my detailed response to you in the previous post.
I am not saying the seeker is not capable(although that could also be a difficulty) I am saying because the missile at supersonic speed and not powered it has less capability to make such big flight path corrections in the terminal stages.if it was fed with a mid course update it has to do...
CM 400 in it's terminal phase is not powered, so to be effective it needs to have mid course updates from launching platform when it is used against moving targets, otherwise being supersonic and un powered in the terminal phase when it's on board seeker activates it will find itself too far...
neither am is I saying that naval blockade is done by mig's, but their primary task is to perform combat air patrol to protect aerial threats like your fighters and p3C Orions etc, so you can't send your anti sub warfare planes because they are extremely vulnerable against our fighter jets so...
well here is my theory.
aircraft carrier doesn't need to be close to shore as our mig's will have 850km combat radius just on internal fuel.we can pull out most of our sub from CBG(p8i can take care of your sub's who approach CBG) and along with few frigates we can stay closer to the shore...
our carrier would be at least 500+ km away from your shore. in front and surrounding will be our frigates with barak 8 and barak 1. now either your have to come closer to 135km minimum to detect our frigate and can fire it around 100-110 km distance at optimum conditions. our frigates has got...
yes I am ! both are entirely different things, please read up and educate yourself, I guess you are a victim of one sided propaganda.
world wars were nations fighting for various disputes, you can accuse Christians of many other bad things which eventually lead to French revolution etc , they...
I don't know which section you belongs to, but so far church has kept out regular Christians and their org or trust from having the ownership of their respective church and belongings, everything is under the priests.
I don't know how is it convenient for Muslims and Christians to oppose hate speech ? I already explained my self clearly. are you suggesting that Hindus are the only ones who make hate speeches ????
what you mean by mis direction ? it's was a well defined section of Hindus who denounce...
I was not aware of govt appeal against court direction, a link would be convenient.
second thing is it doesn't matter whether majority believe cow is holy or not, as India is a secular country , majority's beliefs can't be forced on entire citizen who doesn't share same belief.
Now if you are...
hate speech and killing of cow is different. India is a secular country and cow is considered to be holy among only a section of Hindus(majority).hence it's wrong to ban cow slaughter based on the belief of a section of a religion. btw hujj subsidy is being removed.
about govt interfering temples then it's a concern of Hindus as it's an encroachment on their rights.
I don't know about land given by British and other things but as I said earlier if something wrong has happened or happening try I
to fix it rather than insisting on doing another wrong in...