Search results

check the times now debate with pak representative pirzada, if he represents pak authorities mentality then I see only terrorism and war no peace..we should be prepared.

even if I believe it's true then also Pakistan had no business in interfering the internal matters of princely state of Kashmir, especially when jinnaha had taken the line that people had no say in it and rulers can decide what ever he wants to do, including staying independent, that's why...

I think this time it's real

@notsuperstitious feels like saying something :-P ?

but I don't see nothing wrong in Modi statement, I watched that interview..it seems offensive when used out of context and with small but clever changes in words. any how jayaram ramesh's statement was not even that vulnerable or bad to feel offended, it's just the political bias makes one...

essence of both statements are same, he said " "I think toilets are more important than temples. No matter how many temples we go, we are not going to get salvation. We need to give priority to the toilets and cleanliness." either we should appreciate both of them for what they said or we...

1947 was an attack to capture Kashmir involving guerillas and pak troops..that means the same Pakistan which was singing the song of " freedom of rulers to decide " and acceded junagadh to Pakistan against the will of brute majority of Hindus and supported the nizam of Hydrabad to stay...

I agree with his statement..

except that seti talks sense and arundhiti talks about humanrights of separatists.

recognition can come later also, there are examples of portions of people and land seperating from mother country without international recognition.

what ever ! as a Indian I don't want any negligence from my fellow members here..what we post here thinking as a insignificant info may have a greater value and impact..just being careful.

I didn't mention Pakistan, did I ? now that you mentioned India..I will only say that people who know the history will know who is what.

karan be careful on posting such chit chat info in the forum..we should not compromise the secrecy and security of our country. latest update - army denied the village occupation story.

but much better than making her own statue like mayavati.. A hospital with a modest statue will also work but I can't criticise this move also because countries around the world doesn't wait to fulfill all the needs of people to build a statue..I guess we need to spend some amount of money for...

Life Of Sardar Patel ::Great Indian Leaders

well if US is what you mentioned then what's more disgusting is those countries which used to "lick "the USA(Ultra super..A..) for money and weapons.

Why are we repeating the stupid mistakes again and again ?at least they should have put some surveillance equipments so that they could respond quickly before the enemy can bring more troops , ammunitions and settle down.

if Pakistan recognised independent Kashmir then it wouldn't have attacked Kashmir in the first place..Pakistan didn't recognised peoples will as a deciding factor in partition instead it took the legally correct line that rulers of the state can decide whether to join either of the unions or...

Even if pak prime minister made that statement jokingly i see on offense in it..

that was when Pakistan attacked Kashmir under raja hari singh'rs rule and the attack resulted Kashmir acceding to India and India defended the other half of the Kashmir..if Pakistan agreed peaceful settlement Kashmir would have been acceded to Pakistan instead of India.