Search results

please mention me also when you replay, I am following.

@Peshwa it's true that patiyala state were not yet integrated into Indian army but patiyala state acceded to India and so is a part of India so can we really take such a stand that that they were acting on their own ? can we distant ourselves from the orders of a state head who is accede to...

Another feather on UPA' govt's cap..biggest democracy in the world..my country just refused to support UN Resolution against child marriages...reasons are anybody's guess.. *apart from India Bangladesh is the only asian country which is on board with India in this ridiculous decision. total...

You have no sense of reality and jumps up and down like a moron..talks big words without realising the implications. without cutting down the water significantly what purpose will it serve in real world ? other than a symbolic threat ? There are international laws for up stream/down stream...

I know there is no water treaty, but there is international laws and ethics. if India but down entire water then China can show it as an e excuse and do the same, we lose the moral right to complain in international forums, Pakistan will screw us in international forums because we have violated...

that's a double edged sword, then we can't complain if China does the same.

from legal Pov nothing except tho decision of rules matters..and Pakistan took the same line initially. from Indian POV and practicaly geography, sustainability, peoples choice were considered.religion was also a big factor in each individuals decision making whether to join India or...

thanks. it's multiple articles and sources put together by me as a replay for Kashmir arguments made by Pakistani members..save it and use it and add new things and make it better.:cheers:

yes buddy, same link is given at the end of my opening post..what you have posted is the original source article.Pakistanis doesn't have any logical argument so they call it propaganda or cry foul :rofl:

stay on topic buddy, don't give them a chance to make any logical excuses to close this thread down.

@American Pakistani since you complained and got me thread banned there in other thread, I challenge you to rebute my opening post here, if you don't have the guts then you can complain once again shamelessly and can get me banned.

yes I have an issue with that, the word " hypocrite " is not unparliamentary, so I decided to protest, leaving the forum is an option I may or may not exercise, I don't need you advice.

"Agnostic_Indian that hypocritical nature of jinnaha and league caused all the troubles of partition. ______ American Pakistani I can say nehara & gullanai pateel(or whatever was his name) a hypocrite too but i won't say this, instead i would request Mods @ Aeronaut @WebMaster...

sign the damn deal even with zero ToT and high price..it's frustrating. :hitwall:

you said what's in my mind.. Islamic fundamentalism is the biggest threat and today Hindu extremists are no where near them..but Hindu extremism is a bigger potential threat India could face only because of the sheer number of Hindus in India...I see it as what China and Pakistan is for...

I agree up to the level that Islamic fundamentalism must be opposed and defeated but not with any different kind of religious extremism but nationalism and secularism, religious responses should be limited to spiritual level.

which one ?

a tough stand against pak is what I see one of the good thing about bjp and Modi.

a small state at the bottom of Indian map along with tamilnadu. try wiki for more.

you mean Modi ?