Search results

Gripen RCS is 0.5m2 and Rafale is 1 m2 (that is what i read any one have another source???) First and third points related to each other France is going to replace RBE-2 by F3R to integrate Meteor on Rafale as they said : RAFALE "F3 R" standard launched - Dassault Aviation So that i think RBE-2...

I think Gripen NG is better than Rafale in: 1-Many people said that Gripen radar is better than RBE-2 2- Gripen NG RCS is lower than Rafale 3- Meteor missile performance on Rafale is weak due to radar weakness and Dassault with replace RBE-2 with F3R due this reason and other reasons 4-Rafale...

please anyone can provide me a comparison between RBE-2 and ES-05 in Gripen some people say ES-05 is stronger anyone have answer??

Thanks for your help Also in need from professionals some comparisons according to range and weapons performance (for example) VS Gripen NG radar (with RBE2 not F3R)

Hello all, I read in some pages that Rafale Radar has very weak perfomance This information is right???? please i need some detailed answer and compared to other fighters like Gripen and Typhoon Thanks in advance

don't be angry even it is aspired it is a very good step

America can sell it to other countries

Go ahead Saudi Arabia.......from my heart :-)

this aspired from german system sky guard.... right???

Really awesome.... Turkey with more marketing campaigns can dominate this field Lower price very good specs and that is what any client need

but this more provocation for russia let us see what will happen

NATO is playing with fire F-16 and Rafale in Poland.... CF-18 in Romania... American destroyers in black sea.... Don't sounds good :coffee:

That is good plan.... and also you have the nuclear shield and that is very good you can overcome gaps in other weapons

i think this deal is not good for Pakistan Pakistan needs air superiority fighter.....Pakistan already has many F-16s and JF-17 considered to be like F-16 So Pakistan needs aircraft like Typhoon for example I like the best for Pakistan :-):pakistan:

Pakistan needs to buy air superiority fighter not to buy old F-16 8-)

Thank you for valuable information :china:

i think it is not fair to compare two aircraft Gripen NG will win with its modern avionics

i have a question for you please... when india requested su-30........it was so difficult for russia to put AESA radar in it... answer is NO so PESA radar has uses and AESA has uses..... i think PESA radar increase range and AESA radar gives more stealthy by the way russia put Irbis-E PESA...

i think fighting is equivalent between two fighters so it will appear here the skill of the pilot......

OK you provided me with new info But HQ-9 has the same shape and design of S-300 hahaha:lol: