How are they non-Muslim and Maulana Qasim Nanutwi and his followers are Muslim? Explain that. Also explain why every sect is declared kafir by others. I have given reference of Darulaloom Doeband's fatwa how they declared Shias kafir and murtid. By murtid I suspect they mean worthy of killing...
This is what they did in 1953;
Read more: PAKISTAN: The Mad Mullahs - TIME
This the work of good Muslims trying to uphold Islamic values...hardly.
..and the Justice Munir report;
The Mullah and the Munir Report - Chowk: India Pakistan Ideas Identities.com
clearly explains that...
At least you are honest and have given up the real game behind all this facade of religiosity. It’s the hate by hateful narrow minded people that is driving this.
Read my quote from Justice Munir report on this. Maulanas have yet to agree on the definition of a Muslim even after 1400 years. However there is general agreement that all other sects expect one's own are kafir.
These Arabs should leave their ancestral land and go were? Have the other Arabs left after Israel came into being? Do you give the same advise to leave Israel to rest of non-Ahmadi Arabs too?
By this standard Kashmiris in Indian Kashmir should be expected to leave Indian Kashmir as it is...
Preaching is everyone’s basic human right; obviously you would not know about this. Any country that prohibits it is violating human rights.
Just out of interest, who do you wish were dead, less; Ahmadis or Jews? Would you prefer if Jews were converted to Ahmadis?
Did Israel exist...
More propaganda. Where is the evidence of all this? You don’t much seems to care about substantiating your claims, which means two things; a) you don’t much care for the truth and b) most probably because you don’t think truth is on your side.
Where is the evidence of it? I thought as a REAL Muslim you do not say anything without substance; something to do with being considered a liar and all.
So what is stopping you from investigating their source of income in Pakistan? If you can kill then, jail them, persecute them, surely you...
When at first you don't succeed [in a debate] try try again with propaganda.
---------- Post added at 02:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:17 PM ----------
They should give you money to help build mosques that spread hatred against them? You think they are stupid?
---------- Post...
Not saying something does not mean anything. It’s the actions that count in the end. He did not fight British when he had the ideal chance. What prohibited him form doing so except he did not believe in it? Which ever way you twist and turn this, actions of someone dictate what his real...
In theology question is not of some but of what the clergy/scholars dictate. Scholars of each sect have declared others kafir and often worthy of killing too. The followers if they really follow that sect have to abide at least in principle. So the concept that all sects do declare others kafir...
Hang on a second..the British were there, these maulanas were there yet they did not fight the British.. Actions speak louder than words. You can’t twist your way out of this one.
So there is no agreed definition of who is a Muslim but agreement on who is kafir? Sounds political to me.
However if you leave out Ahmadis then the next step is that Sunnis consider Shias to be kafir. Next Doebandis consider Brelvis kafir and attack them too. Watch the above video; the...
Ahmad Shah Brelvi went all the way from Calcutta through British occupied India to Kashmir to fight Sikhs but never fought with British. Somehow he couldn’t see the British occupation on the way.
Wahabis actually fought with the British help to get rid Arab of Osmani Khilafat. Saudis...
This is not my claim. The video is there for you to see. So you were lying all along that the concept of continuity of prophet hood is un-Islamic. What credibility are you left with now?
If Muslims can't agree on the definition of a Muslim even in 1400 years and will keep fighting then someone has to help.
Generally insults mean you have run out of real arguments.