Search results

BBC reporting that army has cordoned off the area and not even local police are allowed. May be guarding blown out trees to make some beds..

A country which allows UN declared terrorists roam around with weapons objecting to poster against human rights violation? Irony

Why are you correcting him? Don't you this is pakistani forum? truth is banned here..

I have no doubt about it. As India progresses and Pakistan degenerate further, the prosperity gap will only widen.

Believe me, neither do indians. But history can't be changed to suit taste..

Oh, don't get me wrong, I don't believe in akhand bharat as in we need to unite all nations again.. what I meant was when people say India in historical contest, they mean akhand bharat.. My problem with your post is it inaccurate. I got many dreams, akhand bharat is not one of them..

If that is the only error you could find... It is true.. republic of India is indeed artificial.. akhand bharat is what is real :D

Pakistan in part of india. It is an artificial state that is void of history before 1947, and already been devided once.. You are still not able to distinguish zero the place holder and zero the number. Shows the geniusnes of Brahmagupta.

How hard you might try, you can't move river sindhu out of india..

Omg, how many OMG, how many times I need to explain that Al hind referred to the regions of current day af, pak, ind, ban, bur and nepal.... and the indigenous be leafs of this region are grouped under hinduism?

No need for that, I can take guess. But still geography call part of subcontinent, Al Hind hence the residents were hindus..

Subcontinent to start with...

Geography. That has been always the definition..

I feel like Einstein trying to explain theory of relativity to the world!

Buddhists were converted hindus. And you were damn right about "indus" people hating "ganga" people..

It is not a religion even now.. it is collection of indeginous beleafs. And yor ancestors were part of one or the other belief..ergo hindus.

Don't be such thin skinned... you said Hindu term was invented by British, I showed you much earlier use.. correct yourself and move on..

And I thought India didn't resist till 1947! Dude, no use trying to teach anything useful to these guys. They know that even though they are taught that Hindus are bad, everything good happened when their ancestors were hindus..

Seriously, no one has read the article! It clearly says the script doesn't have the "number" zero. That was invented in year 648 current era, by Brahmagupta, in current day Ujjain, MP. what the manuscript had was earliest Hindu notion for "place holder" zero. Place holder zero was invented by...

Even muslims from pakistan started to seek asylum in India.. what's going on there?