Search results

Bhutan is a protectorate of India . India does not handle economic affairs of Bhutan. Please give some reference or source for your fanciful story that India orchestrated expulsion of Nepalis from Bhutan when many of those ended up in India as refugees. As far as i know the Bhutanese king wanted...

Elaborate more on the refugee part. As far as i know it was Bhutan who drove out ethnic Nepalis from their country and many of them took refuge in India.

Most Indians will never be in favour of gobbling any Nepalese territory, all jignoistic opinions you see here are plain trolling. I know Nepali people are very patriotic and any such suggestions made by Indians of merging Nepal with India will not be taken appreciatively by them, btw the article...

Even Westerners and other non-Indians can find it hard to pronounce Indian names but i dont see many Indians having western names apart from christians . BTW I was not criticizing the Chinese rather inquisitive about the reasons for doing so.

What's up with many Chinese having English names ? o_O

Sikkim National Congress itself was pro-merger with India and it had the popular support in Sikkim of all classes and sections. Higher officials of police called IPS are selected and deputed on all India basis , any state will generally have alteast one-third local IPS officers and rest from...

I want to see a India-Pak final, Pak as usual will mantain their record of losing to India in the World Cups and India will win their 2nd T-20 trophy. :cheers:

He was the first Chief Minister of the state and had support of all sections of the society. Lepchas and Bhutias had population large enough to choose any other candidate if they did not favour Dorji's policy, but they also voted in favour of the pro-India party. Nepalis are not foriengers to...

Sikkimese were paranoid about Chinese after what they did with the Tibetans, they had seen hordes of Tibetans fleeing Tibet and arriving in India and heard their horrifying tales . There were pro-India sentiments in Sikkim right after 1947 and demand for merger with India grew with time.

Sikkim National Congress won 31 out of 32 seats in the first election of Sikkim, its leader Kazi Dorjee was a Lepcha.

So did the Sikkimese , they themself revolted against the tyrant rule of chogyal and Sikkim National Congress invited India for intervention.

Lol people of Sikkim themself revolted against the chogyal and asked India for intervention, India friendly Sikkim National Congress was elected before India entered into Sikkim hence they had the mandate of the people, they were the one who first raised the issue of merger with India.

Illeterate savages ran over tibetans' land on the 50s , India held a referendum in Sikkim before it became a part of India. The pic you've posted is lathicharge by the police to maintain law and order and says nothing about racial profiling by police.

Idiot, Neplais have been living in Sikkim centuries before British arrived, Sikkim for a brief period was under the nepalses rule. Buddhist Sikkimese ie lepchas and bhutias for sure hate China as hell for what they did to tibetan buddhists. Sikkim is the most peaceful state in India and there's...

You cockroach munching loser Assam Rifles are deployed in Assam and other North-east states, with Nepal we have an open border with minimal police deployment. Anti insurgency ops in Nagaland are carried jointly by Nagaland police and Assam Rifles, Naga regiment was raised in the Indian army on...

3rd ODI: Pakistan v India at Lahore, Dec 31, 1982 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo Match played on 31st December 1982 (FRIDAY) :enjoy: India won by 18 runs

Yes they were not under the Umayyad flag anymore and a lot weaker. The kingdoms on the east of Indus were no better, the Pratiharas, Rashtrkuta and Palas constantly fought among themselves and exhausted their resources so no one east of Indus had the time and energy to march westwards to capture...

They were very much Arab , not under the flag of Umaayid caliphate as was the case during the Battle of Rajasthan . Umar al-Habbari II was the ruler of Sindh when Masudi visited Sindh. After the loss in Battle of Rajasthan arabs made Mansura ,on the west side of Indus their capital. Habbari...

IIRC Sindh was governed by muslim rulers and northern areas by Hindu rulers (Hindu Shahis ???) Arabs still ruled Sindh after the loss at the Battle of Rajasthan . Al-Masudi a traveller from Baghdad wrote in his account how Pratihara ruler Bhoja would fight with the muslim rulers west of Indus...